F (U' F) // EO(3/3)
(U' L) // DR-4E4C(2/5)
D' L2 B2 D L' // DR, 2c4(5/10)
U (F2 [D B2 D F2 L2 U') // HTR(8/18)
(R2 F2 D2] R2 U2) // LS(5-1/22)

[] = U R2 U B2 R2 D' B2 R2 U D(+1/23)

This scramble had either multiple 4movers or no sub6 eo on every axis so i didn't write any 5movers, but everything was just bad until i found this dr with 3 11move extensions so i just focused on those, this is optimal unfortunately.

I had this dr:
F (B2 U' F)
(L' D2 F2 B2 L U D) // 4b5 in 11, i knew it would be 4b2 4e shape on normal so i didn't switch rzp but apparently it had 22, skull

(F') U2 D2 F // EO(4/4)
R' U D2 B2 L' U2 L // DR, 4b2(7/11)
(U R2 U' L2 U' B2 U') // HTR(7/18)
(L2 B2) // 2E+M slice(2/20)


(...[U R2 U' L2 U'] B2 U' L2 $ B2 L' U2 # L...)

& = M2(+0/20)
# = S2(+2/22) // now it's 4x on E slice, saw this from htr but almost didn't make it work in time
[] = D B2 U' F2 D U2 y2(+1/23)

Other dr:
U (R' F' U)
(B')
(U2 F2 U2 L B2 R) // 2c3 4e in 11 with 4 variations, but 24 overall optimal

I went a bit too fast on inverse eos and noticed that (F' B' R L' B) was jzp, but not that (F B' R L' B) was jzp and 2c3 in 10 that Wen used for 22. What i found was one of 2 unique 23s of my jzp, and the other one is a 2 move htr extension, so i'm pleased at finding this

(L' U' F R B') // EO(5/5)
L' D2 F2 R' D // DR, 4a1(5/10)
F2 L (R2 D2 R' U2 D2 L') // HTR but actually double slice(8-1/17)

So in another words:
F2 [L2 U2 D2 R D2 R2] // 3e + slice(7/17)

[] = R2 U2 D2 L F2 L R &(+1/18)
& = R' B2 U2 F2 L' F2 U2 B2(8-5/23)

Optimal 22 uses D2 F2 L to HTR-4e but on inverse it's U2 F2 instead of B2 D2 to trigger which i missed. Also had double slice in 19 and slice in 22 from this dr but only 24, and slice in 23 that was +1

Other:
(U' F' R L B)
(U L2 R' U R) // 4b2 2e in 10, 23 optimal

(F R U L B)
(L2 U2 F2 L' D) // 4a4 in 10

(F R U L B)
R L' U2 L' F2 U // 4a4 in 11

(U' F R L B)
(F2 U L2 R' U R) // 2c4 in 11

(U D' B' D)
(F' L U2 F' U2 R2 B) // 4b3 in 11

(F' B L U R')
(F D B2 L2 U B) // 4a4 in 11

(U' F R L B)
U' L2 U2 R U' R // 2c4 in 11

Didn't even get to checking eos on normal in this attempt which is kinda skull, but everything on inverse gave sub12 drs and i found 2 drs with 22 potential relatively early so didn't bother. Mallard gives 21 from niss eo i didn't write down so finding 22 from 4a1 would've given findable optimal from eos i had, but final solution is kinda cool so that's ok i guess

(F D R' D2 B) // EO(5/5)
R2 U2 R B2 L' U // DR, 2c3(6/11)
R' U2 [R U2 R' // HTR(5/16)
U2 D2 F2 L2] B2 // LS(5-1/20)

[] = L F2 L R2 U2 D2 B2 R2(+1/21)

Another solution which was much  more fun:
(F D R' D2 B)
(U' R' D F2 D2 R') // 0c0 4e in 11 with rzp in 7
(U2 L2 U' F2 B2 U)
(L2) // M slice in 18 lol, but didn't find anything better than +5 on the spot((((

Other drs:
B (D2 B)
(U R)
(U2 D R' F2 D2 R) // 4b3 in 11

B (D2 B')
(R' D)
(R D2 L' U2 L' U) // 2c4 in 11

B (D2 B)
(R D2 L F2 R2 D' L' U) // 2c3 4e in 11

(D2 B' R D2 F)
F2 R' F2 U L' D // 4b3 in 11

B' (D2 B)
D2 L2 F2 R D L U // 4a4 in 10, but apply dr flip to get:

B' D2 L2 F2 R D L U F2 B2 L // 4a2 4e in 11, but bad

This was a surprisingly fun attempt for a shitty 6/6/8

(L) R' B U2 R // EO(5/5)
L2 B U2 F U D // DR, 4b3(6/11)
(F' L2 D2 F2 D2 F' U2 F') // HTR(8/19)
(U2 F2 R2 L2) // finish(4/23)

Other:
F D B L U'
B D2 B2 R2 B R' // 2c3 in 11, 24 opt

F' D' B L U
(F2 U2 R2 B' F2 R) // 4a2 in 11, 23 opt from variations but you have to do 2 half turns switch

Kinda skull scramble, lucky i decided to write down these niss 5movers cause everything else didn't work

F' L D R // EO(4/4)
(R2 L2 D B U') // DR, 4b2(5/9)
(R2 B' U2 F R2 F R2 F) // HTR(8/17)
(D2 R' L D2 F2 L R') // finish(7-1/23)

Such a scammy dr, i quickly understood that it's no good with 2q and checked a ton of 4q paths, only finding this on last minutes. For the only findable 22 on this you had to add not 1 but 2 half turns after (R2 B') which is bruh, and hilariously a 2move extension of this dr is 11+8 with 4q

Only other dr i had was:
F L' D R
B (F2 U' D2 B2 D' F) // 4b2 in 11 but also bad

L2 U // EO(2/2)
R F' // DR-4E4C(2/4)
U2 L U2 B2 L' B // DR, 4a3(6/10)
[R D2 R2 F2 R U2 R' // HTR(7/17)
B2 L2] F2 U2 D2 // LS(5/22)

[] = R' F2 R2 D2 L' B2 L' F2 R2(+0/22)

Also a direct 22 after dr:
R (F2 R2 U2 F2 L' B2 L)
(B2 U2 L2 U2)

Other drs:
L2 U R F' (R L B2 R' D2 B) // 2c4 in 10
L2 U F L (F B L' B R B' L) // 4b3 in 11
(L2 B' D' L F' R' U2 B2 L) // 4a3 in 9, had double slice in 20 here that's probably 23, but there are no 21s off jzp that use dr

Pretty nice solve, i had 23 off slice i used in final in like first 10 minutes, then after checking qt and switch on all 9mover variations i came back to that slice and improved it to 22 with blocky fish rewrite, but then also found a different slice in 22 and a direct 22, which is optimal from dr. Pretty happy with this solve from time management point of view as well, i managed to at least look at 4 variations of 4a3 in 9, 4a3 in 10 and 2c4 in 10

L2 B // EO(2/2)
D' // DR-2E3C(1/3)
L2 F2 L2 U L' U // DR, 2c3(6/9)
F2 [R F2 R' F2 D2 R // HTR(7/16)
U2 R2] U2 R2 // LS(4/20)

[] = L D2 R' D2 B2 L D2 L2(+0)

Pretty much the first thing i checked, had 3 other drs in 9 from this rzp but i don't feel like checking 4q stuff on 4b2 4e fishing for 19

(U' R B D') // EO(4/4)
(B') // DR-4E4C(1/5)
(D2 R L2 B) // DR, 2c4(4/9)
(F2 R F2 [L' D2 B2 R' B2 R']) // HTR(9/18)
(U2 F' B' D2 F' B) // LS(6/24)

[] = R' B2 U2 R' U2 L'(+0/24)

This is optimal with 4q, skull. Didn't have time to check many 5movers unfortunately, and this was my only workable dr. Missed 11mover with very easy 22 off (U' R2 F L)

D2 B D R // EO(4/4)
(F2 D' F D' F) // DR, 4b2(5/9)
[U' R2 F2 L2 F2 D'] // HTR(6/15)
B F' D2 B F L2 F2 // LS(7-1/21)

[] = D' F2 L2 B2 L2 U'(+0/21) // it's a miracle this was +0 lol

Other:
D2 B D R B2 F' D F // 2c3 8e in 8
(R2 U' R' D2 R2 L2 F2 D F) // 2c3 8e in 9
(D R2 U' R' U F2 D' B) // 2c3 4e in 8, there's an easy 20 from 1-move extension, oops

(L') F U' B2 L * // EO(5/5)
B // JZP(1/6)
(U2 F' L2 B') // DR, 2c3(4/10)
(R2 D B2 F2 R2 F2 U B2 U') // HTR, 2E2E(9/19)

* = L2 F2 B2 R2 F2 B2(6-2/23)

Skill issued out of 21. I had (R2 D) U B2 U', but if you switch back and add S2 before R2 D you get 21, and that's the only way to get sub23 on variations. 23 is still very good for the scramble so it's not too bad

B' U L U R // EO(5/5)
F D B2 R2 B' L2 B // DR, 4b2(7/12)
[L2 D R2 U'] // HTR(4/16)
F B' D2 R2 F B // LS(6/22)

[] = U' D F2 D B2 D'(+2/24)

Bad, should've checked extensions on niss 4mover

(
F' U B // EO(3/3)
U // DR-4E4C(1/4)
D2 F2 U2 L' D' // DR, 4b2(5/9)
B2 U2 D2 R D2 * R' // HTR(6/15)
D2 B2 L2 F2 // 2E2E(4/19)
)

* = U2 F2 B2 D2 L' U2 F2 B2 D2 R(10-8/21) // technically just an htr extension but i saw it through tracing hperm before qt

L' D' F U R' // EO(5/5)
F R2 B' F2 U' // DR, 4b5(5/10)
F U2 F' R2 F D2 [F' D2 F' // HTR(9/19)
L2 U2 L2 F2] // LS(4/23)

[] = B' L2 B' R2 D2 R2 B2(+0/23)

Lol

(F) D' B2 R B' // EO, DR-8E8C, AR-3C1E(5/5)
R' L' U L' D' L // DR, 4a1(6/11)
(R2 U' R2 B2 L2 * [U F2 U') // HTR(8/19)
(B2 U2 D2]) // 2E2E(3/22)

* = L2 B2 L2 B2 L2 B2(6-4/24)
[] = U' D2 B2 U F2(-1/23)

Very nice to finally use 8e8c ARM knowledge

L R2 U2 F // EO(4/4)
U // DR-2E4C(1/5)
L F2 L' B2 D // DR, 4b3(5/10)
F2 R' B2 R B2 R2 U2 R // HTR(8/18)
F2 D2 F2 U2 R2 B2 // SOLVED(6/24)

Other drs:
U2 F U (F L F R2 D2 B R) // 4a2 4e in 10, spent all my time on this just to miss an htr variation, i did U2 R2 F (L2 U2 L2 U2 L2 F'), but you can start with R2 on inverse to cancel a move for an easy 23, could be found even as slice cancellation, cause i had 2 slices in 23 that were +1, so i could just cancel htr setup for 23, bruh
U' L R2 F R2 D L2 F2 D' U2 L // 4b3 in 11
R2 U' L F U B2 L' B2 L' R2 U // 2c4 in 11
U2 F U L2 F2 B2 U2 R D2 R' B // 2c4 in 11

L (B L) // EO(3/3)
D // DR-2E4C(1/4)
B R2 F' L2 B U B2 U' // DR, 2c3(8/12)
L2 F' R2 B' R2 L2 D2 F' // HTR(8/20)
D2 F2 D2 // FINISH(3/23)

Such a shitty scramble for 3 3movers, all my sub12 drs were 4+ qt, most of them 4b5

Also i'm so bad for not finding L' (B L) D rzp, bruh

(
B F2 D L' U' // EO(5/5)
B2 R L' B' L F' // DR, 2c3(6/11)
L' B2 R U2 R' // HTR(5/16)
F2 D2 L2 F2 D2 F2 R2 // FINISH(7/23)
)

Hate such eo spam scrambles. I don't know how i could miss dr in 9 from L' U R' D', luckily it's 23 optimal. Checked like 50ish eos, but didn't check the one that Baiqiang used for 22, could've found that I think, but with having practically nothing at 35 minutes i'm absolutely fine with a 23

B' U R // EO(3/3)
(U F) // DR-2E4C(2/5)
B D F2 R2 D' B // DR, 2c3(6/11)
D2 L2 D' B2 L2 U B2 U' // HTR(8/19)
R2 U2 B2 R2 F2 // solved(5-1/23)

Other drs:
(U' F' D2 R) D' L2 D F L2 U2 F // 2c3 in 11, had 24 from this, 23 opt isn't findable
B' U R (U F D2 B2 D B' D2 B) // 2c4 in 11
B' U R (R2 B D2 L2 U' D2 B R2 F) // 2c3 in 12
B' U R (B2 U B2 F  D2 B2 D' B2 D) // 2c3 in 12
(D U' F' R D2 F D2 L2 B2 F D' F) // 4b2 in 12

F' U L' D' F' // EO(5/5)
L2 U' D2 L F2 L' // DR, 4b2(6/11)
U L2 D' L2 D' F2 R2 U // HTR(8/19)
D2 R2 B2 D2 R2 B2 D2 // solved(7/26)

Very bad solve. Missed some findable 25, but no reasonable 24s or lower across all my drs.

Other drs:
F (R L U F) L D2 L2 F2 R U // 2c4 in 11
F (R L U F U' D2 B2 U F2 L) // 2c4 in 11

Also somehow missed dr in 10 after F (R L U F) which Mauro used for 22, bruh

D R L2 B // EO(4/4)
(U2 F2 U L2 D' L) // DR, 2c4(6/10)
D (F2 L2 U F2 [U R2 U']) // HTR(8/18)
(F2 L2 R2) // 2E2E(3/21)

[] = U' R2 U2 R2 U(+2/23)

The biggest variation hell I've ever seen probably. I spent like 20 minutes checking variations of (B) F2 D' F' R U R' U2 F2 U2 R // 2c3 2e in 11, found 22 from it but turned out i misscrambled somewhere. There's a 20 from 1 of variations I checked but to get it you had to switch after (B' D) and spam all variations until you get lucky, which is doable but there were so many non-niss htrs in 16-17 that i just decided to leave it be and look for other drs. Dr i used in final is 22 optimal which is findable but not in the time i had left at the point i started checking it so i guess 23 is ok, but still this attempt wasn't a pleasant experience

(
R U' D2 B' // EO(4/4)
R' // DR-2E3C(1/5)
D2 R2 L D' L // DR, 4b2(5/10)
R2 F2 B2 [D' F2 U // HTR(6/16)
L2 D2 R2 B2 U2] // LS(5/21)
)

[] = U' R2 D R2 D2 L2 F2 D2(+0/21)

Also had this dr with cool trigger, but had nothing better than 22 to slice from it
D2 F2 L
F
(B D F2 U' B) // 2c3 4e in 9

B2 D2 L' B // EO(4/4)
D' L // DR-2E3C(2/6)
U2 D R' U R // DR, 2C3(5/11)
B2 [D' F2 R2 D F2 D // HTR(7/18)
F2 R2 U2 F2 U2] F2 // LS(6/24)

[] = U' R2 B2 U' D2 B2 D B2 L2 U2 B2 D2(+1/25)

Wasn't in great mood for the attempt so wrote too little 5movers, and there's an easy 22 from 4mover extension I definetely could've checked. The dr I used turned out to be 24 optimal by switching after 2 moves to 4b2 4e and that's the only way to get 24.

Also completely missed that (U) was rzp after (D2 L R F), could've easily found 22 that Xiwen got

R B U // EO(3/3)
(F' L' B2 L' F') // DR, 4b3(5/8)
(D2 R' F2 R F2 L2 U2 L') // HTR(8/16)
(B2 U2 D2 R2 U2 D2) // finish(6-1/21)

B D L // EO(3/3)
F' U // JZP(2/5)
(R2 F2 L2 D' F2 D') // DR, 4b2(6/11)
(R2 F D2 F) // HTR(4/15)
([L2 B2 D2] U2) // M slice(4-1/18)

[] = L' R' U2 B2 L' R(+3/21)

I had 9mover that others extended to 11 for a 19, sad I didn't try it but still I think it's my best result on scramble with 10 bad so I'll take it

19 is actually just an 8-7 insertion of my M slice, a bit annoying but I dont mind missing that too much

D' F' D' L2 D // EO(5/5)
(B2 R' L' D2 B' R F) // DR, 4b2(7/12)
(R' U2 R F2 R D2 B2 L) // HTR(8/20)
(B2 * U2 D2) // 2E2E(3-1/22)

* = B2 L2 F2 D2 R2 F2 L2 U2(8-5/25)

Trash solve, I understood that this requires rzp in 6 too late, so i ended up with like 5 rzp out of 44 checked eos. 

There is actually a quite interesting 24 from this 2e2e, which is one of 2 24s on these drs variations including double slice on eo

(R' U2 [R F2 R D2 B2 L] B2 U2 D2)

[] = L D2 R {B2 U2 * R(+0) // this changes last move to R so that 2e2e becomes 6mover
* = U2 R2 U2 R2} U2 R2(+3/25), but
{} = R2 U2 R2 B2(-1/24) // blocky fish rewrite for slice in 24, which can be reinserted in +0

Definitely could've found this but I found this 2e2e at 55 minutes

The other 24 I missed is more straightforward but i didn't have time to check htrs in +9:
D' F' U' F2 U
(B2 R L U2 F' R B)
U2 B2 L -> +3 finish from one of square square htrs

(U' F L2 D) // EO(4/4)
(U2 B D2 F) // DR, 2c4(4/8)
L F2 L' B2 U2 R U2 D2 [R2 U2 R] // HTR(11/19)
B2 R2 // LS(2/21)

[] = L2 D2 R' L2(+1/22)

After seeing what others got: missed pb 21.00 mean cause this is slicable to 21 by moving U2 D2 in other place for R and L2 to cancel:
R U2 D2 $ L2 D2 L2 $ R'

$ = E2(-1/21)

L' B D' R U // EO(5/5)
F' // DR-4E4C(1/6)
U2 R' F2 L F // DR, 2c3(5/11)
(L D2 L' U2 L) // HTR(5/16)
(D2 R2 U2 F2 L2 F2) // finish(6-1/21)

Lol, lucky rzp in 6 despite scramble having eo in 3

L2 D' B // EO(3/3)
(U2 L') // DR-2E3C(2/5)
U2 F2 R2 L' D L' // DR, 2c3(6/11)
(F2 R2 [U' F2 D B2 D) // HTR(7/18)
(R2 F2 R2 D2 F2 D2] F2) // LS(7/25)

[] = D' L2 U F2 D L2 B2 L2 D2 B2 U2(+0/25)

Atrocious solve. Just awful time management, this is second time this week I'm getting 25 on this good of a scramble

(B F U' R') // EO(4/4)
(D) // DR-4E4C(1/5)
B R2 B' L2 B D' // DR, 2c3(6/11)
(U2 [F U2 R2 B L2 B']) // HTR(7/18)
(L2 D2 R2 D2) // LS(4-1/21)

[] = B L2 U2 F2 B' U2 F'(+1/22)

Other drs:
U B' (U' B) F2 R2 B2 D F2 U' // 2c4 in 10, spent most time on this, missed 23 cause of trying (D2 L) U2 L, but not trying (D2 L) D2 L
(B F U' R D) L2 U2 B' F2 U // 4c3 in 10, 24 opt

Missed that you could set up to 5mover in 2 instead of 6mover in 1 from B' F2 L' D which others used for 21, but 22 is not bad considering I found it in the last 10 minutes after having nothing from 4c3 and 2c4 in 10

(
U L' D' // EO(3/3)
L // DR-4E4C(1/4)
D2 L2 D2 B L // DR, 2c3(5/9)
[F D2 F2 U2 F' L2 F] // HTR(7/16)
L2 B2 U2 R2 D2 // LS(5/21)
)

[] = B R2 B2 R2 F' U2 B(+0/21)

Same solution as mallard limited to eo in 4, nice. Got this dr at about 25 minutes so decided not to finish checking 4movers and nissing a lot of rzps, cause 2c3 2e in 9 should be good for at least a 22. After finding this solution at 45 minutes decided to switch some rzps and almost immediately found this:
(U L' D F2 L) L F' L // 2c4 in 8 lol, but i checked it for a bit and decided it probably doesn't have +12

Overall pretty happy with this mean

(B2 D F' B) // EO(4/4)
(R') // DR-2E4C(1/5)
D B2 D R D2 R // DR, 4b2(6/11)
({D F2 D' B2 [D' L2 D]) // HTR(7/18)
(L2 F2 R2) // 2E+slice(3-1/20)

[] = D L2 D2} L2 D'(+2/22)
{} = U L2 D' R2 D B2 U' D'(+1/23)

This dr is 22 optimal if you insert non-slice 2e in a different spot for 22 to slice that has +0 but not mad about missing it cause got to this dr pretty late and found this leave slice with ~8 minutes left. Other drs:
(B2 D F' B R) D F2 U L U2 L' // 4b2 in 11, this variation is 6e so i spent more time on it and had a backup 25
(F R) D2 L U (U2 F2 R2 L2 B U') // 2c4 in 11

(D L F' D) // EO(4/4)
R' B2 L U2 B' L F // DR, 2c4(7/11)
L B2 [L' F2 L F2 L' // HTR(7/18)
D2 R2] B2 D2 // LS(4-1/21)

[] = R' D2 R' L2 B2 L' U2 L2(+1/22)

Lol. I hate 2c4 except when it's +10 to slice from the first htr you try