B2 F L F // EO(4/4)
L // DR-4C2E(1/5)
(R') // now it's DR-4C4E(1/6)
(L2 D2 L2 D' R) // DR, 2c4(5/11)
(F2 U F2 D L2 [D' L2 D') // HTR(8/19)
(B2 L2 U2] B2) // LS(4/23)

[] = U' F2 U' F2 R2 D2(+0/23)

Worked for majority of attempt on
F2 L F'
R D
L2 F2 U2 R' L2 D // 4b2 4e in 11 with a variation

I found this from it
F2 L F'
R D
R2 B2 D2 R' L2 U'
L D2 R (D2 L U2 D2 R')
(D2 R2 F2 B2 D2 L2) // slice in 24, solve in +0

And decided to briefly check the 2c4 in 11 and it just worked immediately lmao. The only way to get 23 from variations of 4b2 is to do 2qt to 4b2 2e and switch so no.

Somehow mallard only finds 22 from doing jzp in 6 on (F2 U B' L) which i missed, or there is a 19 by doing premove abuse on F/B on normal

(L D L' U') // EO(4/4)
(F') // DR-4E4C(1/5)
(R' B2 R B) // DR, 4b2 4e(4/9)
R (L2 & F2 U2 F2 D2 R) // HTR(7/16)
(U D F2 U' D' L2 &) // LS(6/22)

& = M2(-1/21)

Other drs:
(U' L D')
(F L')
L F' L' // 4b2 4e in 8, but not sub21able

(U' L D')
(F L')
(R' B R) // 4a4 in 8

(L D L' U)
(B R)
(B R' F' R) // 2c4 in 10

(L D' L' U')
(R2 B2 R' F' R' B) // 4b2 2e in 10, missed direct 21 from variation, oops

The U/D eos on inverse were so cracked i barely checked anything else before securing a 21 at 37 minutes. Apparently mallard only finds 20 if you insert a D2 before trigger to get a 2c4 in 9 instead of 4b2 in 8 and that one is actually 20 optimal, bruh

(F') D' R' D' F // EO(5/5)
(R2 F2 B2 L D') // DR, 2c3 2e(5/10)
(L' U2 [L' U2 F2 L']) // HTR(6/16)
(D2 R2 F2 B2 D2) // LS(5/21)

[] = R' F2 D2 R L2(+1/22)

Other drs:
(U2 R2 B)
(L)
D L2 U R // 2c5 in 8

(D2 L2 F)
(R)
F2 B2 U L2 U L // 2c5 in 10

R L F2 U' L
(U2 L2 U2 D2 F) // 2c3 4e in 10

(F) R' D' F'
R2 U D' B2 D' R // 2c4 in 10

(F) B2 R' D' F
D L2 U' B2 U' L' // 4b2 2e in 11

There's a very easy 18 here if you switch (L2 D2 F) which i didn't because i thought (U2 R2 B) was equivalent to it, such a skull moment

B (U F' B) // EO(4/4)
D' F2 R2 U' R2 D' // DR, 4c3(6/10)
(U2 L U2 B2 L B2 R2 U2 R) // HTR(9/19)
(F2 R2) // LOL(2/21)

I found the 9+4 from this eo at sub10 minutes and pretty much spent the whole attempt on this eo. I tried extending this htr cause it was very blocky and it worked out nicely. There's also a 21 from 9+4 from an htr i checked by nissing a wrong variation and i didn't see the finish, also htr in 19 lol.

There's a 20 from a niss 5mover i had but didn't check, but the path is pretty tricky with nissing 4a1 reduction

R2 L' F D // EO(4/4)
U2 R' D2 L D2 B' // DR, 4b2 4e(6/10)
(D2 R') D2 L' F2 R' F2 L' // HTR(8/18)
F2 B2 D2 // lol(3/21)

Spent a ton of time on:
(F L F' U)
L2 U2 L F // 2c4 in 8, but even 22 is barely findable

(R' D' L F) // EO(4/4)
F2 D2 B2 L U D' // DR, 4a3(6/10)
(L') R D2 [R2 F2 R' // HTR(6/16)
L2] U2 D2 F2 U2 // LS(5/21)

[] = L2 B2 R(-1/20)

I didn't mess up 1 solve this week, yay(still gonna lose most likely)

B' U B' // EO(3/3)
U B2 U2 L' U' R' // DR, 2c4(6/9)
[U' L2 F2 U] B2 U' B2 U' // HTR(8/17)
F B' D2 R2 F B' // LS(6/23)

[] = D' B2 L2 D(+0/23)

Absolute garbage solving this solve. I missed 2 22s from 2 different htrs i had, and 21 from a dr by missing that you can do 1 move to 4b2 2e on a 2c3, like wtf.

The other variant of this dr has a 22 from (U) D' L2 D' ... but i took 1 glance at the htr and skipped it, despite it having 6 to slice

Another 22 i missed from:
B' U B'
U' L'
(U F2 U' L') // 2c3 4e in 9
D' R2 F2 B2 ... // htr in 16, which has 5 moves to M slice that solves in +1, how tf did i miss that

And there's this:
(U2 B' R B)
U D L2 R' D' L // 2c3 4e in 10, and if you just do a qt right here and switch it's an automatic 21, i'm so bad this week

L (B R U' L) // EO(5/5)
(B' U B2 U' B2 U2 B) // DR, 4b2(7/12)
(L2 F2 [U F2 D]) // HTR(5/17)
(L2 F2 R2 B2) // LS(4/21)

[] = U' D2 B2 D' U2(+2/23)

I am actually so stupid

First of all, i realised i didn't right down this group eo until after 50 minutes so i didn't have time to check this properly:
(U' B F' L F')
(U' D L' D' R) // 2c4 4e in 10

This is luckily(or no?) not sub23 optimal, BUT i had this:

L (B R U' L)
D2 U' L2 D'  U2 B' U2 B // 4b3 in 13 but a ton of blocks
L2 B2 D' B2 D
L2 D2 L2 D2 // slice in 22 but no +0

And this is what mallard gives:
L (B R U' L)        //eo-lr      (5/5)
U2 D' F2 U F' U2 F  //dr-ud-eolr (7/12)
R2 F2 D' F2 D       //htr-ud     (5/17)
R2 D2 R2 U2         //finish     (4/21)

Which is actually not the best you can do off that dr in 12, which is 20 optimal

I have no idea how i could miss this rzp->dr, so stupid of me

(B U B2 D' L') // EO(5/5)
(D') // DR-2E3C(1/6)
(F' D2 U' F U) // DR, 4b2(5/11)
(R2 F) B2 D2 F L2 F U2 B // HTR(9/20)
R2 U2 F2 // LOL(3-1/22)

[B2 D2 F L2 F U2 B R2 U2 F]...

[] = F2 U2 B U2 F R2 B D2 R2 B(+0/22)

What a shitty scramble, mallard only finds sub25 using rzp in 5 from a niss 5mover with R U2 L trigger, other than that you need rzp in 6

(R B') R2 B // EO(4/4)
R2 U' L // DR-4E4C(3/7)
D' R2 D R // DR, 2c3(4/11)
(U') F2 D L2 D // HTR(5/16)
(B2 R2 B2 D2 L2 F2 U2 R2) // LS(8/24)

...D L2 [D R2 U2 F2 L2 D2] B2...

[] = U F2 U' D' B2 R2 U2(+1/25)

Fuck...

I thought i was saved by this dr but the unique 24 optimal is 5q. Missed an rzp in 6 for 21, skull

(R' F) // EO(2/2)
(L D) // DR-2E3C(2/4)
U2 F2 U2 D' L D // DR, 2c3(6/10)
R2 D2 L D2 & L' B2 L // HTR(7/17)
D2 // S slice(1-1/17)

& = D2 B F' R2 B' F(+4/21)

Other drs:
(R) D' U2 R'
F2 L2 D2 F2 D' // 4b2 4e with 4 variations and +1 extension gives 4a1 2e, but no sub21s off jzp

(R' F)
(L D)
L' D2 U R U // 2c4 in 9

(R' F')
(D2 R)
D' L2 U B2 D2 R // 2c4 in 10

(R' F)
D' R
D R U2 R' // 2c5 in 8

Nice solve and funny solution, happy i found this extension and checked it before anything else, was literally going to check the shortest htr an move on and it gives this lol.

Unfortunately there's a very easy 18 if you do (B2 R' F U2 L) to jzp instead of just (B2 R' F L). With the added move it's +3 to dr on normal and the 7move trigger on inverse gives finish in 3. Other than that mallard doesn't seem to find any sub21s, but it still sucks to miss this

(R U' F D) // EO(4/4)
(B' R' F) // DR, 4b4(3/7)
(R') {L' F2 L B2 L2 D2 R // HTR(8/15)
L2} [D2 L2] B2 // M+E(4/19)

[] = U' D' F2 U D'(+3/22)
{} = R' D2 R' U2 R2 B2 R(-1/21)

Well that was stressful, lol. This is optimal and mallard doesn't find sub21, but i hated the experience.

My only other dr was:
(R' B U F' L)
(B R2 U2 B2 U') // 2c4 in 10 with a bunch of variations

(F U' R F B) // EO(5/5)
(D) // DR-4E4C(1/6)
(R F2 B2 D') // DR, 2c4(4/10)
F2 L' D2 L U2 L' U2 L' // HTR(8/18)
F2 R2 D2 R2 D2 // solved(5-1/22)

My only other dr was:
(D R' D2 F' U)
(R')
(B L2 F' R2 F) // 4b2 2e in 11 with lots of variations but it has parity on both sides and after finding 22 from the other one i didn't check 4q here, turns out sub22 isn't possible from jzp

You can get 20 by checking one of 64 eo extensions on inverse U/D, which is findable of course but i didn't write the right one, other than that mallard doesn't give sub22s so i'm pretty happy with this solve

R2 B U2 L' // EO(4/4)
(D2 B L2 R2 D') // DR, 2c3(5/9)
(F) U2 B' L2 B' // HTR(5/14)
D2 L2 F2 B2 // E+S(4-1/17)

....B' L2 [B' D2 L2 F B2] D {L2 R2 B'} D2

[] = F' {{R2 D2}} B' z2(-1/16) // S 4x + M
{} = F' B U2 D2 F' z2(+2/18) // M
{{}} = R L B2 L' R(+3/21)

Other:
B2 L2 D2 L'
B' U2 B U // 2c4 in 8 but crappy so i ditched it

R' F' L2 U
(B' F2 L' F R B) // 4c3 in 10, finally used the 8c8e->7c8e trick, had a backup 23 from this(htr in 15 lol)

Also had a bunch of 2c4s in 10, but 21 is optimal from dr, shame double slice in 16 that immediately gave slice in 19 was only 21 optimal. I somehow didn't find the 4c3 in 10 from nissing B L2 D2 L that gives 20, i either misscrambled or somehow forgot to niss it

(D) R D B2 D // EO(5/5)
F R' B' // DR, 2c3(3/8)
L (R F2 R') // HTR(4/12)
(F' B U2 F' B D2) // finish(6/18)

This is freaking hilarious, i wrote down 80 eos and this randomly popped up in the first group i checked, at first i didn't ever write down this exact eo but (D) U R2 U looked nice but a bit off so i tried this and lmfao.

At first when i was just checking direction of the first qt L D2 L' F2 L' led to 3e+4x in 13, which is just an S slice in 13 effectively, unfortunately doesn't solve too nicely but i can't really complain, this is optimal from scramble as well, first sub20 on a 10 bad scramble i think lol

L (L2 F2 D L) // EO(5/5)
(D' B2 L2 U F) // DR, 2c4(5/10)
U' (D B2 D' B2 L2 [D') // HTR(7/17)
(F2 U2] F2 R2 B2) // LS(5/22)

[] = D U2 B2 D2(+1/23)

Phew, i'd never get this in time officially, i found this dr at 51 minute, slice at 58 minutes and thankfully it solved in +1 on the spot, wrote this down with 17 seconds remaining.

My backup since 37 minutes was:
(B) F2 U' D F
L
D2 F2 D' R' F2 R // 2c3 4e in 12
B2 D R2 D B2 R2 U'
R2 B2 D2 F2 D2 // 24

All my sub12 drs were 4+ qt somehow, the one in final being the only 2c4:

(D' B R L F)
L' B2 R B2 D // 4b5 in 10

(L' B R D F)
D2 R' L U2 R D // 4c4 in 11

L' F D B L
F
(D' B2 L2 U F) // 4c4 in 11

The fact that mallard doesn't find a sub23 with rzp in 6 and switch after eo is kind of nuts, so i'm very happy i managed to find this(and in time thankfully)

L R' B' R' // EO(4/4)
B F2 R2 B2 L2 U // DR, 2c3(6/10)
(L2 B) R2 F2 D2 [F R2 F' // HTR(8/18)
R2 F2] D2 R2 D2 B2 // LS(6-1/23)

[] = F2 B' D2 B' L2 B2(+1/24)

I spent a lot of time on this but still missed a 21 from the first variation i checked with a 7move trigger i know but didn't try, such a skull:
nissy-# solve -t 64 -M 16 R' U' F U D' R2 L' B' R L B U F L2 F' D2 L2 U2 F L2 U2 F2 D2 L2 R' U' F L R' B' R' B
F2 R2 F2 R2 D' F R2 U2 F' B2 L2 D2 B' U2 B2 L2 (16)

I spent a lot of time also on these 2 scammy drs that are both 22 optimal with 5q:
L R2 D
U2 L F' L' B // 2c3 8e in 8

L R2 D
U2 L' R2 B' L' F // 2c3 6e in 9

Very disappointed with this solve

B2 D // EO(2/2)
(F L') // DR-4E4C(2/4)
(U2 F' U2 B R') // DR, 2c4(5/9)
(U2 B R2 F L2 D2 B R2 B) // HTR(9/18)
(D' U B2 R2 D U') // finish(6-2/22)

Also found this other 22 at 57 minutes:
D R U' F' L
B' L2 U2 B U // 4a2 4e in 10
(L2 F D2 F2 D2 L2 F)
(L2 U2 R2 U2 F2)

Other drs:
B2 D'
(F L)
U2 B F2 L2 F L // 2c4 in 10

B2 D
(R F)
B2 L2 D2 F2 R B // 2c3 6e in 10

D U2 R' F' L
(B F R2 U' B2 U) // 4a2 4e in 11

D' (D B D)
R' L' F' U2 L2 F // 4a4 in 10

Somehow mallard finds only 1 21 despite eo in 2, and it uses +3 rzp into 7c8e so like no, pretty happy with 2 22s on this and the mean overall

B' U' F B // EO(4/4)
(L U) // DR-4E4C(2/6)
L' B2 D2 R' U // DR, 4b2(5/11)
([R F2 D2 L') // HTR(4/15)
(F2 L2 D2 F2 U2 F2] U2) // LS(7-1/21)

[] = L D2 B2 L' D2 R2 F2 U2 B2 U2 L R'(+2/23)

What a scramble, checked 72 eos but this was one of my only 2 sub12 drs, the other one:
F (D2 F2 L B)
R
(R2 D' L' U L) // 4b3 in 11

I found dr i used for final at around 45 minutes, at which point i already checked all eos and switched all rzps in 5, so this was pretty much the last rzp i was going to check before finishing bad 4b3 in 11, very happy i managed to finish this with slice not cooperating and being barely even +2. Mallard gives sub23 off only 1 dr, even with switch before rzp and rzp in 6, so 23 is quite good i think. The dr that gives 21 is a pretty wierd setup to R U L of niss eo that i checked but didn't find dr:
R' (U2 B U R')    //eo-lr      (5/5)
(B D2 L2 U B' D)  //dr-fb-eolr (6/11)
B' L2 F' (U2 B')  //htr-fb     (5/16)
U2 D2 R2 U2 F2    //finish     (5/21)

First i found:
L U2 R'
D F
D R2 D' B // 2c3 4e in 9
R2 D R2 F2 B2 D' F2 D'
F2 U2 B2 L2 // 21

Then on a potentially better dr:
R B2 L' // EO(3/3)
U B // DR-4E4C(2/5)
U L2 D' B // DR, 2c3 2e(4/9)
(B2 D' R2 F2 D' L2 D') // HTR(7/16)
(B2 R2 U2 L2 B2) // finish(5-1/20)

Had these other drs:
R (B' R)
D
L2 D2 B' D2 F // 4b2 4e in 9

L U2 R' 
D
(B' R2 F' U F' U) // 4b2 2e in 10

R B2 L
U' B
R2 F2 D // 4b5 in 8

L U2 R'
D
F' U2 D B D // 2c5 in 9

Mallard doesn't find a sub20 so i'm quite happy with the solve, found 20 at like 35 minutes and was chilling after that

F B (R' U2 F') // EO(3/3)
(B2 D2 R2 D F2 R') // DR, 4a1(6/11)
(F2 B2 U) // HTR(3/14)
(F2 U2 B2 L2 F2 R2) // finish(6/20)

This is freaking hilarious, mfw a scramble with 17 5movers(i found 12) has the easiest 20 from the second eo i check, found this at 8 minutes and am ending attempt at 18 cause like why continue

R2 D' R' D' B' // EO(5/5)
(L R2 D2 F2 $ D) // DR, 2c4(5/10)
[R' D2 L' F2 U2 D2 L F2 L'] // HTR(9/19)
F2 U2 D2 // M+E(3-1/21)

$ = F2 U' D R2 U D'(+1/22)
[] = L' F2 R' F2 U2 D2 R U2 R'(+0/22)

That's the most disgusting scramble with 2 4bad axes i've ever seen. Mallard gives 21 from a particular F/B 5mover that i missed or some 2+3s, so 22 is ok. I was putting off solving this M slice for like 15 minutes since i doubted it could be +0 given slice configuration, but turns out widening all qts just worked and it's optimal from first 6 moves, lol

R' (B R) // EO(3/3)
B D // DR-2E4C(2/5)
(U D2 B2 U2 F' U) // DR, 4b2(6/11)
L2 U2 [L2 B' D2 F // HTR(6/17)
B2] D U' L2 U D // LS(6-2/21)

[] = F B' U2 B' L2 B'(+1/22)

Other drs:
R (B R')
U B
(U B2 L2 D' B) // 2c4 in 10, 23 opt

(R2 U' F' R2 D)
(L')
(F' R B' R) // 4b2 4e in 10, but 22 to slice was the best i had and it leads to 23 optimal

(D F R2 U)
(B F)
(L' F R' L2 B) // silly 4a3 in 11 number 1

(F U F2 D')
(F)
(L2 D2 L B R2 F) // silly 4a3 in 11 number 2

Apparently if you do (U') instead of (U) for additional rzp in dr i used in final it gives immediate htr in 14 and automatic 21, bruh

U' (B2 D' B U) // EO(5/5)
L2 F2 R' F2 L B' // DR, 4b2(6/11)
D2 B2 R B2 [R // HTR(5/16)
B2] F2 R2 D2 // LS(4/20)

[] = L D2 L R'(+2/22)

Also had this cool 23:
U (U' B D') // EO(4/4)
(L) // DR-8E8C(1/5)
R2 F U2 B' R L // DR, 4b2(6/11)
(D2 L2 B L2 F') // HTR(5/16)
F2 L2 U2 L2 U2 B2 R2 // finish(7/23)

Also at the very end of attempt i found this:
U' (U' B' D')
L' R F R2 B // 2c3 4e in 9, but thankfully all sub22s are not very findable

L2 D' B F' U' // EO(5/5)
L F2 B' R B // DR, 2c3(5/10)
(R) U2 R' U2 B2 L // HTR(6/16)
B2 D2 F2 B2 // finish(4/20)

Lol that was unexpected. Misscrambled my inverse cube so like half my eos weren't working when i switched, which also meant i had little time to check inverse 3movers, but a random 2c3 5e from a random 5move extension of 8 bad 4 optimal axis somehow gave +10.

I also missed the 10+3 from switching D' R2 U2 R, oops

F' B' D R // EO(4/4)
U' // DR-4E4C(1/5)
(F D2 B' U2 F' U) // DR, 2c4(6/11)
(D2 [F R2 B U2 B' U2 R2 F') // HTR(9/20)
(B2] D2) // LOL(2/22)

[] = B U2 F U2 F' L2 U2 B(-1/21)

This is hilarious, found this dr at 45-50 minutes and this is one of the first htrs i tried.

Had this but it was very bad:
(D') R2 U'
F L
(F D2 F' B' L) // 4a3 in 10 with 4 variations

(U' F R2 D') // EO+JZP(4/4)
D2 R2 {F' R2 B} // DR, 2c4(5/9)
([R B2 L F2 U2 R U2 R') // HTR(8/17)
(U2 R2]) // M+S(2/19)

[] = L U2 L D2 F2 R F2 L R2 D2 L2(+1/20)
{} = F2 B U2 F(+1/21)

I think this is findable optimal from eo, which i'm very happy about considering this has 4 variations on normal, and i only found this dr at 45 minutes because of messing around with a blocky 12+2 with slice in 22 way too much, i believe it's 24 optimal but i'm lazy to check. I found the slice at like 55 minutes, lucky it was very easy with M slice solving automatically with 4x on the spot and S slice being literally best possible case.

20.33 is a very nice way to start the league, been a while since i had sub21 except that stupid fmc-info mean

(D' R' D) // EO(3/3)
(F' L F' L' F) // DR, 4b2(5/8)
F2 U2 [R' U2 L'] // HTR(5/13)
F2 L2 F2 U2 F2 U2 // LS(6/19)

[] = L' B2 R'(+0/19)

Very spammy scramble, got to this eo at like 30 minutes and finished attempt at 37 xd. There is a findable 18 on this if you insert U2 before additional (F') rzp into different 2e3c, then switch and the most obvious htr on normal gives dr in 11, htr in 12 and finish in 18, though i don't know if i would find it anyway cause there is a more obvious slice in 18.

Anyways happy with the 19

(D L' U' D) // EO(4/4)
L2 F' B R2 F' B' // DR, 2c3(6/10)
R (B2 D2 R D2 R) // HTR(6/16)
(B2 U2 D2) // LS(3/19)

...[R U2] D2 B2 R'...

[] = L F2 L' R(+2/21)

Cool eo into cool dr and a nice finish, very happy with this start to the league) This can easily be found from normal but i switched the other eo variation first

Other drs:
(L) B2 R'
(U')
(B F' D B' D) // 4a4 in 9

(B) R U' R2 B
U2 D' R' D // 2c3 6e in 9, 21 opt with 5q

(L) B2 R'
(U')
F U2 B' D F D // 4a2 4e in 10, 22 opt with 4q

(L) B2 R'
B'
U R2 B2 U D2 B // 2c4 in 10, 23 opt

B' (B2 L' B) // EO+JZP(4/4)
L2 B2 R2 F2 U // DR, 2c4(5/9)
(L U2 R' D2 R) B2 R2 B2 D2 R'] // HTR(10/19)
U2 D2 F2 // 2E+M(3/22)

[] = D2 R2 B2 D2 [R(+1/23)

...D2 {R U2 D2 F2 R'} D2...

{} = L F2 B2 D2 L'(+0/23)

Was kinda desparate at the end after switching 4b2s didn't work so decided switching 4a1 reduction from (L U2 R' D2 R F2 U2 D2 R) htr and try all variations and it worked out, this is optimal from variations i believe lol

Other dr:
B' D
(L B)
(R D2 R2 U2 R' F) // 4b3 in 10, 24 opt

Missed rzps on normal for 21, bruh

(L') B U R // EO(4/4)
B' // DR-4E4C(1/5)
({{D2 F2 B2 U2 L2 U}} B') // DR, 4b2(7/12)
(F2 {D' R2 [F2 U']) // HTR(5/17)
(R2 L2 U2}) // 2E+LS(3/20)

[] = U2 B2 D2 B2 U(+3/23)
{} = D F2 U D F2 L2 D R2 L2 D2(+0/23)

But then when writing down solution i noticed

{{}} = R2 D2 F2 B2 U'(-1/22)

Also had this slice in 23 from dr with 3c6e:
U (L F L D)
(F B' R F2 B' L)
(B) B2 U2 F' D2 R2 L2 B
R2 U2 L2 D2 F2 B2

L (R' F B2 R) // EO(5/5)
(B' L2 B2 U) // DR, 4a1(4/9)
B' U2 B U2 D2 F // HTR(6/15)
(F2 R2 D2 R2 U2) // finish(5/20)

Missed a unique and kinda hard optimal by 1 again, it's +8 to htr and +2 to slice and +0. I had a slice in 19 on this but i'm pretty sure it's +2, glad i found a 20 anyway

F2 U' R2 F // EO(4/4)
R2 D2 L' B2 D' // DR, 2c4(5/9)
F2 R B2 R' (L2 U2 B2 R' U2 R) // HTR(10/19)
(D2 R L F2 R' L') // finish(6-2/23)

...R B2 [L F2 R' L' D2 R' U2 R B2 U2 L2]

[] = R U2 L2 U2 L' F2 L F2 D2 R2(-1/22)

Other drs:
D' B2 L2 R D
F
D2 B R B // 2c3 in 10 with htr in 15 on inverse, but somehow 23 opt

F' L B2 R
F
D2 R2 U B2 D B // 4a3 in 11

D U B2 R' U'
F2 R B D2 R2 B // 2c3 6e in 11

There is a unique 21 optimal from my dr, but it's 2 half turns before qt on normal and 3move finish, not unreasonable but not too mad for missing it, relatively happy with +1 optimal on this

R' D2 L U D // EO(5/5)
F' D2 R2 F' R' L // DR, 2c4(6/11)
B R2 L2 D2 F D2 [F' D2 F // HTR(9/20)
D2 R2 L2 F2 B2] // LS(5/25)

[] = B' L2 B' F2 U2 R2 L2(-1/24)

Also:
(L B L2 R' F) // EO(5/5)
(U' R2 F2 B2 L U') // DR, 4a3(6/11)
(R'^) B2 D2 B2 U2 L'^ F2 L // HTR(8/19)
B2 R2^ U2 F2 B2 // LS(5/24)

^ = w(+0/24)

Again an awful scramble where i found 2 24s, optimal from 8e8c is 23 but it's from a variation i forgot about, and uses switch after 4b2 so kinda hard. Kinda trash week

(L U' B2 R) // EO(4/4)
(D2 B2 U2 B' L2 U') // DR(6/10)
(F' L2 [B R2 B']) // HTR(5/15)
(U2 D2 B2 D2 R2) // 2E2E(5/20)

[] = B' L2 F2 L2 B(+2/22) // this slice is +1, but now switch 4a1 reduction

(F' L2 B') L2 D2 F // HTR(6/16)
L2 U2 D2 F' B' U2 F B' // finish, not slicable unfortunately(8-2/22)

Kinda bad for the scramble, but optimal from my drs somehow

Other drs:
B' U R2 B
U B2 D2 R' U' // 4a2 in 9 with 2 more variations but 22 optimal from everything, skull

L R' B' R
F2 D2 B' D2 F U // 2c3 in 10, 23 opt

R2 L' D' B
(D)
U2 D' L' D // 2c5 in 9, missed extension to 10 for 2c3 but 22 opt

Also found some 10move drs which i didn't even write down cause everything was so overwhelming

B (R2 U D' F) // EO(5/5)
(D) // DR-4E4C(1/6)
U2 D2 R' L2 D2 R' D' // DR, 0c0(7/13)
[L U2 D2 L // HTR(5/17)
D2 R2] B2 U2 F2 B2 D2 // LS(7-1/23)

[] = R F2 B2 L F2 L R(+1/24)

L' B2 D' R' // EO(4/4)
(U D' F U' B D' B) // DR, 2c4 with rzp in 7 cause the shape looked good(7/11)
D F2 U' R2 [U R2 D2 F2 U // HTR(9/20)
R2 F2 D2] R2 // LS(4/4)

[] = U' B2 U2 R2 U' L2 B2 U2(+0/24)

What a shitty scramble, even with rzp in 6 mallard doesnt find sub23 with dr in 11, except with R U2 L trigger on the only niss U/D eo extension i didn't write down, oops. Found 2 kinda ridiculous 24s, first the kalindumaxxing one at around 40 minutes, then went on to check 2c4 in 11 but didnt expect anything from it cause it requires 2 half turns on both sides for 2c3 reduction

I also had an htr for 23 from the dr in 13 variation, but somehow didn't see double slice finish, kinda skull
B (R2 U2 D' F)
(D)
U2 D2 R U2 R L2 D
L U2 D2 L

Here i saw that R2 F2 B2 U' D' B2 U D gave S slice, but i both didn't realize it's solvable in +0 by just moving F2 B2 before R2, and also i didn't count moves for this and assumed it was too long