R2 L' F D // EO(4/4)
U2 R' D2 L D2 B' // DR, 4b2 4e(6/10)
(D2 R') D2 L' F2 R' F2 L' // HTR(8/18)
F2 B2 D2 // lol(3/21)

Spent a ton of time on:
(F L F' U)
L2 U2 L F // 2c4 in 8, but even 22 is barely findable

(B U B2 D' L') // EO(5/5)
(D') // DR-2E3C(1/6)
(F' D2 U' F U) // DR, 4b2(5/11)
(R2 F) B2 D2 F L2 F U2 B // HTR(9/20)
R2 U2 F2 // LOL(3-1/22)

[B2 D2 F L2 F U2 B R2 U2 F]...

[] = F2 U2 B U2 F R2 B D2 R2 B(+0/22)

What a shitty scramble, mallard only finds sub25 using rzp in 5 from a niss 5mover with R U2 L trigger, other than that you need rzp in 6

(R B') R2 B // EO(4/4)
R2 U' L // DR-4E4C(3/7)
D' R2 D R // DR, 2c3(4/11)
(U') F2 D L2 D // HTR(5/16)
(B2 R2 B2 D2 L2 F2 U2 R2) // LS(8/24)

...D L2 [D R2 U2 F2 L2 D2] B2...

[] = U F2 U' D' B2 R2 U2(+1/25)

Fuck...

I thought i was saved by this dr but the unique 24 optimal is 5q. Missed an rzp in 6 for 21, skull

R2 B U2 L' // EO(4/4)
(D2 B L2 R2 D') // DR, 2c3(5/9)
(F) U2 B' L2 B' // HTR(5/14)
D2 L2 F2 B2 // E+S(4-1/17)

....B' L2 [B' D2 L2 F B2] D {L2 R2 B'} D2

[] = F' {{R2 D2}} B' z2(-1/16) // S 4x + M
{} = F' B U2 D2 F' z2(+2/18) // M
{{}} = R L B2 L' R(+3/21)

Other:
B2 L2 D2 L'
B' U2 B U // 2c4 in 8 but crappy so i ditched it

R' F' L2 U
(B' F2 L' F R B) // 4c3 in 10, finally used the 8c8e->7c8e trick, had a backup 23 from this(htr in 15 lol)

Also had a bunch of 2c4s in 10, but 21 is optimal from dr, shame double slice in 16 that immediately gave slice in 19 was only 21 optimal. I somehow didn't find the 4c3 in 10 from nissing B L2 D2 L that gives 20, i either misscrambled or somehow forgot to niss it

(D) R D B2 D // EO(5/5)
F R' B' // DR, 2c3(3/8)
L (R F2 R') // HTR(4/12)
(F' B U2 F' B D2) // finish(6/18)

This is freaking hilarious, i wrote down 80 eos and this randomly popped up in the first group i checked, at first i didn't ever write down this exact eo but (D) U R2 U looked nice but a bit off so i tried this and lmfao.

At first when i was just checking direction of the first qt L D2 L' F2 L' led to 3e+4x in 13, which is just an S slice in 13 effectively, unfortunately doesn't solve too nicely but i can't really complain, this is optimal from scramble as well, first sub20 on a 10 bad scramble i think lol

L (L2 F2 D L) // EO(5/5)
(D' B2 L2 U F) // DR, 2c4(5/10)
U' (D B2 D' B2 L2 [D') // HTR(7/17)
(F2 U2] F2 R2 B2) // LS(5/22)

[] = D U2 B2 D2(+1/23)

Phew, i'd never get this in time officially, i found this dr at 51 minute, slice at 58 minutes and thankfully it solved in +1 on the spot, wrote this down with 17 seconds remaining.

My backup since 37 minutes was:
(B) F2 U' D F
L
D2 F2 D' R' F2 R // 2c3 4e in 12
B2 D R2 D B2 R2 U'
R2 B2 D2 F2 D2 // 24

All my sub12 drs were 4+ qt somehow, the one in final being the only 2c4:

(D' B R L F)
L' B2 R B2 D // 4b5 in 10

(L' B R D F)
D2 R' L U2 R D // 4c4 in 11

L' F D B L
F
(D' B2 L2 U F) // 4c4 in 11

The fact that mallard doesn't find a sub23 with rzp in 6 and switch after eo is kind of nuts, so i'm very happy i managed to find this(and in time thankfully)

L R' B' R' // EO(4/4)
B F2 R2 B2 L2 U // DR, 2c3(6/10)
(L2 B) R2 F2 D2 [F R2 F' // HTR(8/18)
R2 F2] D2 R2 D2 B2 // LS(6-1/23)

[] = F2 B' D2 B' L2 B2(+1/24)

I spent a lot of time on this but still missed a 21 from the first variation i checked with a 7move trigger i know but didn't try, such a skull:
nissy-# solve -t 64 -M 16 R' U' F U D' R2 L' B' R L B U F L2 F' D2 L2 U2 F L2 U2 F2 D2 L2 R' U' F L R' B' R' B
F2 R2 F2 R2 D' F R2 U2 F' B2 L2 D2 B' U2 B2 L2 (16)

I spent a lot of time also on these 2 scammy drs that are both 22 optimal with 5q:
L R2 D
U2 L F' L' B // 2c3 8e in 8

L R2 D
U2 L' R2 B' L' F // 2c3 6e in 9

Very disappointed with this solve

F B (R' U2 F') // EO(3/3)
(B2 D2 R2 D F2 R') // DR, 4a1(6/11)
(F2 B2 U) // HTR(3/14)
(F2 U2 B2 L2 F2 R2) // finish(6/20)

This is freaking hilarious, mfw a scramble with 17 5movers(i found 12) has the easiest 20 from the second eo i check, found this at 8 minutes and am ending attempt at 18 cause like why continue

R2 D' R' D' B' // EO(5/5)
(L R2 D2 F2 $ D) // DR, 2c4(5/10)
[R' D2 L' F2 U2 D2 L F2 L'] // HTR(9/19)
F2 U2 D2 // M+E(3-1/21)

$ = F2 U' D R2 U D'(+1/22)
[] = L' F2 R' F2 U2 D2 R U2 R'(+0/22)

That's the most disgusting scramble with 2 4bad axes i've ever seen. Mallard gives 21 from a particular F/B 5mover that i missed or some 2+3s, so 22 is ok. I was putting off solving this M slice for like 15 minutes since i doubted it could be +0 given slice configuration, but turns out widening all qts just worked and it's optimal from first 6 moves, lol

R' (B R) // EO(3/3)
B D // DR-2E4C(2/5)
(U D2 B2 U2 F' U) // DR, 4b2(6/11)
L2 U2 [L2 B' D2 F // HTR(6/17)
B2] D U' L2 U D // LS(6-2/21)

[] = F B' U2 B' L2 B'(+1/22)

Other drs:
R (B R')
U B
(U B2 L2 D' B) // 2c4 in 10, 23 opt

(R2 U' F' R2 D)
(L')
(F' R B' R) // 4b2 4e in 10, but 22 to slice was the best i had and it leads to 23 optimal

(D F R2 U)
(B F)
(L' F R' L2 B) // silly 4a3 in 11 number 1

(F U F2 D')
(F)
(L2 D2 L B R2 F) // silly 4a3 in 11 number 2

Apparently if you do (U') instead of (U) for additional rzp in dr i used in final it gives immediate htr in 14 and automatic 21, bruh

U' (B2 D' B U) // EO(5/5)
L2 F2 R' F2 L B' // DR, 4b2(6/11)
D2 B2 R B2 [R // HTR(5/16)
B2] F2 R2 D2 // LS(4/20)

[] = L D2 L R'(+2/22)

Also had this cool 23:
U (U' B D') // EO(4/4)
(L) // DR-8E8C(1/5)
R2 F U2 B' R L // DR, 4b2(6/11)
(D2 L2 B L2 F') // HTR(5/16)
F2 L2 U2 L2 U2 B2 R2 // finish(7/23)

Also at the very end of attempt i found this:
U' (U' B' D')
L' R F R2 B // 2c3 4e in 9, but thankfully all sub22s are not very findable

L2 D' B F' U' // EO(5/5)
L F2 B' R B // DR, 2c3(5/10)
(R) U2 R' U2 B2 L // HTR(6/16)
B2 D2 F2 B2 // finish(4/20)

Lol that was unexpected. Misscrambled my inverse cube so like half my eos weren't working when i switched, which also meant i had little time to check inverse 3movers, but a random 2c3 5e from a random 5move extension of 8 bad 4 optimal axis somehow gave +10.

I also missed the 10+3 from switching D' R2 U2 R, oops

F' B' D R // EO(4/4)
U' // DR-4E4C(1/5)
(F D2 B' U2 F' U) // DR, 2c4(6/11)
(D2 [F R2 B U2 B' U2 R2 F') // HTR(9/20)
(B2] D2) // LOL(2/22)

[] = B U2 F U2 F' L2 U2 B(-1/21)

This is hilarious, found this dr at 45-50 minutes and this is one of the first htrs i tried.

Had this but it was very bad:
(D') R2 U'
F L
(F D2 F' B' L) // 4a3 in 10 with 4 variations

B' (B2 L' B) // EO+JZP(4/4)
L2 B2 R2 F2 U // DR, 2c4(5/9)
(L U2 R' D2 R) B2 R2 B2 D2 R'] // HTR(10/19)
U2 D2 F2 // 2E+M(3/22)

[] = D2 R2 B2 D2 [R(+1/23)

...D2 {R U2 D2 F2 R'} D2...

{} = L F2 B2 D2 L'(+0/23)

Was kinda desparate at the end after switching 4b2s didn't work so decided switching 4a1 reduction from (L U2 R' D2 R F2 U2 D2 R) htr and try all variations and it worked out, this is optimal from variations i believe lol

Other dr:
B' D
(L B)
(R D2 R2 U2 R' F) // 4b3 in 10, 24 opt

Missed rzps on normal for 21, bruh

L2 U // EO(2/2)
R F' // DR-4E4C(2/4)
U2 L U2 B2 L' B // DR, 4a3(6/10)
[R D2 R2 F2 R U2 R' // HTR(7/17)
B2 L2] F2 U2 D2 // LS(5/22)

[] = R' F2 R2 D2 L' B2 L' F2 R2(+0/22)

Also a direct 22 after dr:
R (F2 R2 U2 F2 L' B2 L)
(B2 U2 L2 U2)

Other drs:
L2 U R F' (R L B2 R' D2 B) // 2c4 in 10
L2 U F L (F B L' B R B' L) // 4b3 in 11
(L2 B' D' L F' R' U2 B2 L) // 4a3 in 9, had double slice in 20 here that's probably 23, but there are no 21s off jzp that use dr

Pretty nice solve, i had 23 off slice i used in final in like first 10 minutes, then after checking qt and switch on all 9mover variations i came back to that slice and improved it to 22 with blocky fish rewrite, but then also found a different slice in 22 and a direct 22, which is optimal from dr. Pretty happy with this solve from time management point of view as well, i managed to at least look at 4 variations of 4a3 in 9, 4a3 in 10 and 2c4 in 10

L2 B // EO(2/2)
D' // DR-2E3C(1/3)
L2 F2 L2 U L' U // DR, 2c3(6/9)
F2 [R F2 R' F2 D2 R // HTR(7/16)
U2 R2] U2 R2 // LS(4/20)

[] = L D2 R' D2 B2 L D2 L2(+0)

Pretty much the first thing i checked, had 3 other drs in 9 from this rzp but i don't feel like checking 4q stuff on 4b2 4e fishing for 19

(U' R B D') // EO(4/4)
(B') // DR-4E4C(1/5)
(D2 R L2 B) // DR, 2c4(4/9)
(F2 R F2 [L' D2 B2 R' B2 R']) // HTR(9/18)
(U2 F' B' D2 F' B) // LS(6/24)

[] = R' B2 U2 R' U2 L'(+0/24)

This is optimal with 4q, skull. Didn't have time to check many 5movers unfortunately, and this was my only workable dr. Missed 11mover with very easy 22 off (U' R2 F L)

D2 B D R // EO(4/4)
(F2 D' F D' F) // DR, 4b2(5/9)
[U' R2 F2 L2 F2 D'] // HTR(6/15)
B F' D2 B F L2 F2 // LS(7-1/21)

[] = D' F2 L2 B2 L2 U'(+0/21) // it's a miracle this was +0 lol

Other:
D2 B D R B2 F' D F // 2c3 8e in 8
(R2 U' R' D2 R2 L2 F2 D F) // 2c3 8e in 9
(D R2 U' R' U F2 D' B) // 2c3 4e in 8, there's an easy 20 from 1-move extension, oops

(L') F U' B2 L * // EO(5/5)
B // JZP(1/6)
(U2 F' L2 B') // DR, 2c3(4/10)
(R2 D B2 F2 R2 F2 U B2 U') // HTR, 2E2E(9/19)

* = L2 F2 B2 R2 F2 B2(6-2/23)

Skill issued out of 21. I had (R2 D) U B2 U', but if you switch back and add S2 before R2 D you get 21, and that's the only way to get sub23 on variations. 23 is still very good for the scramble so it's not too bad

B' U L U R // EO(5/5)
F D B2 R2 B' L2 B // DR, 4b2(7/12)
[L2 D R2 U'] // HTR(4/16)
F B' D2 R2 F B // LS(6/22)

[] = U' D F2 D B2 D'(+2/24)

Bad, should've checked extensions on niss 4mover

(
F' U B // EO(3/3)
U // DR-4E4C(1/4)
D2 F2 U2 L' D' // DR, 4b2(5/9)
B2 U2 D2 R D2 * R' // HTR(6/15)
D2 B2 L2 F2 // 2E2E(4/19)
)

* = U2 F2 B2 D2 L' U2 F2 B2 D2 R(10-8/21) // technically just an htr extension but i saw it through tracing hperm before qt