D2 B2 U // EO(3/3)
B2 R B2 L // DR, 4a2 4e(4/7)
U2 F^ L2 F2^ L2 U2 B'^ // HTR(7/14)
R2 D2 F2 D2 // LS(4/18)

^ = w(+0/18)

Found this very late somehow, because at first i only checked the other way of doing trigger on this eo variation cause it gives a 1 move shorter htr, and then went on to wack variations on the 4c3 in 7, if this wasn't +0 probably would've have been able to slice this in time

Nice to get a scramble once in a while where you get a 20 even if you mess up

R' L' (F L') // EO(4/4)
D' // DR-4E4C(1/5)
(B2 D2 L2 R2 F' D) // DR, 4b2 4e(6/11)
L2 [F' L2 D2 F] // HTR(5/16)
U' D R2 U' D' // LS(5-1/20)

[] = F B2 R2 U2 B2 F'(+2/22)

+6 double slice, skull

I was working on this for the second half of the attempt, which has a findable 21 that i could've found but i didn't check the right thing
(R L) R2 F' R
D B' U // 2c4 in 8

(B) R' D' F // EO(4/4)
(U2 D2 L' U' R U') // DR, 2c3 4e(6/10)
(L2 F2 L D2 B2 R' F2 R) // HTR(8/18)
(D2 F B D2 R2 F B') // finish(7-2/23)

League scrambles being either straight up bullshit or fake good is starting to get to me, what the hell was this

I had this and also 2c4 in 10 with 2 variations here, and for some reason i decided not to write down optimal eos on R/L on inverse(the only axis i didn't do this for this scramble), and there's a 2c4 in 9 on that with a relatively easy 21

U2 R2 U F B // EO(5/5)
(R' U2 L' U2 R2 D) // DR, 4b2 2e(6/11)
D2 R2 D2 L' D2 L' // HTR(6/17)
B2 {R2 B2 D2} // E slice(4-1/20)

{} = U' D B2 L2 U D(+2/22)

Kinda hard to tell if this is optimal from variations but this is ok for the scramble.

There is a 19 here by extending (R' D F B) to 5mover and doing rzp in 6, and a 21 extending a dr in 8(which i missed, oops) by 3 for dr in 11 and it's apparently +10

(F) B2 D' U2 B // EO(5/5)
L' R' F2 R F2 U' // DR, 4a2 4e(6/11)
[R D2 R2 B2 L // HTR(5/16)
B2 R2 D2 F2 L2] D2 B2 D2 F2 // LS(9-1/24)

[] = R' B2 L2 U2 L' B2 L2 U2 B2 R2(+0/24)

What a fucking scramble, this was my only viable sub12 dr and this is optimal somehow.

I noticed the shape on (F B' L2 D' B') looked nice but missed dr for 20, other than that everything good is from 2+3s here which i didn't check

L (L U F L) // EO(5/5)
D2 B U2 B2 D2 F D' // DR, 2c3 4e(7/12)
{F' D2 R2 B' R2 L2 F2 L2 F D2 F' B} // solve by doing start of the trigger and then it finishes by itself(12/24)

{} = F2 B R2 U2 B' U2 D2 F2 D2 F R2(-1/23)

I hate it when there's a unique good thing on the scramble and i barely miss it. i had (U L2 B F2 R) rzp and switched it, but didn't find 3 moves to trigger and there's a free 20 from that

Other drs:
D R F
(U' L)
(U D2 R' D R) // 2c4 in 10, 23 opt

U' F2 L
(U2 B)
D2 R2 D2 R2 F // 4c3 in 10, 22 opt but not realistically findable

I also found this
L (D F' D2 L)
(F')
(D2 B2 U F2 D') // 4b2 4e in 11

And if i only tried D R2 U instead of U F2 D i would've found a free 22, sad. I think this is the only of 4 variations i didn't look at on inverse before trying some variations on normal

(R D F' L') // EO(4/4)
(D2 L2 F2 B2 D' B) // DR, 4c3(6/10)
(D R2 D'^) U2^ B2 U^ // HTR(6/16)
F2 D2^ B2 L2 F2 B2 // LS(6/22)

^ = w(+0/22)

This looks like unique optimal off this dr's variations so that's good. Missed a 21 from same eo, but you have to extend 5c6e 5mover in a really cool way

L' B' // EO(2/2)
D' // DR-4E4C(1/3)
(R L U' L2 B2 U) // DR, 4b2 4e(6/9)
(L2 D2 [L B2 U2 L']) // HTR(6/15)
({F2 L2 D2}) // E+M(3-1/17)

[] = R D2 B2 R'(+0/17)
{} = U' D R2 F2 U D(+3/20)

Other:
B' F2 U R' L'
F' D F' D // 4a3 in 9

L2 D2 L D
F R2 B U2 F L // 4a3 in 10

B R L2 D'
L
F D2 R D2 R' // 4a4 in 10
D2 R2 F R2 F2 D2 // 2e2e in 16 lol

L' F U D R' // EO(5/5)
B U2 D2 F // DR, 2c3 4e(4/9)
(U2 B2 U R2 B2 U' F2 U') // HTR(8/17)
(R2 D2 B2 L2) // E+S(4/21)

([U2 B2 U R2 B2 U' F2 U' R2 D2] {B2 L2 F' U2 D2 B'}...)

[] = D2 F2 D F2 R2 U' L2 D' L2 U2(+0/21)
{} = F2 R2 B' R2 L2 F B2(+1/22)

(B2 D L') // EO(3/3)
(U B) // DR-4C4E(2/5)
(U2 F2 D' L2 F) // DR, 4c3(5/10)
(U L2 B2 U' R2 D2 $ F2 D') // HTR(8/18)
(R2 F2 D2 B2) // LS(4/22)

$ = D2 R2 U2 B2 U2 R2 D2 F2(+0/22)

I found this at around 20 minutes, and forgot that i didn't check extensions of 3mover and went on to check around 50 5movers on normal. Then i returned to inverse and founds 2 variations of 2c4 in 8 but turned out they are both +15 optimal lmfao.

I had this:
D B L F2 D
F
B2 D2 L' D2 R // 0c4 in 11

I don't know why, but i didn't check L2 F2 L' B2 R after jzp which gives 0c0 4e in 11 and a free 21, skill issue, but other than that there seem to be no findable 21s so 22 is ok i guess

D2 B U2 R' F' // EO(5/5)
(R' B2 L' D) // DR, 2c4(4/9)
R' (L2 D2 F2 L' U2 L B2 L) // HTR(9/18)
(B2 U2 L2 D2 R2) // LS(5-1/22)

...F' [R D2 L2 U2 B2 L'] B2...

[] = L B2 R2 B2 D2 R'(+0/22)

Nice, mallard only finds sub22 from switching 5mover or by jzp on 2+2 that i missed, ooops

L' (F L' R) // EO(4/4)
(D') // JZP(1/5)
(L2 F R2 B) // DR, 2c4(4/9)
B2 [U' F2 U' L2 U L2 U' // HTR(8/17)
D2] F B' U2 F B // LS(6-2/21)

[] = D' L2 U D2 F2 D R2 U(+0/21)

Double slice in +3 with 4q and F R2 B, skull

L B' F' L' F // EO(5/5)
U2 L2 D L D' // DR, 4c3(5/10)
L B2 L D2 R2 D2 F2 R' // HTR(8/18)
L2 F2 U2 F2 U2 // finish(5/23)

You can get a 20 by doing rzp in 6 to 2e3c and dr in 11, or a 21 from rzp in 6 on (D) D2 U' L' U but it doesn't look like 5 to dr at all.

I had this dr, but delayed solving it too much to find an easy 22:
L B' F' L' F
(R D R' D) // 4c4 in 9, 22 opt

(D' F2 D) // EO(3/3)
(B' L') // DR-4C2E(2/5)
D2 B R F2 R' // DR, 4a2 4e(5/10)
(F2 U2 F) B2 U2 L2 D2 F // HTR(8/18)
U2 B2 D2 R2 F2 // finish(5-1/22)

Had a lot of mediocre drs in 10, this seems to be optimal from everything i had. Missed a 21 because i somehow forgot to switch the 3mover on normal, oops

R' B // EO(2/2)
(L') // DR-4E4C(1/3)
(R2 D U' L2 D' L) // DR, 4b2 0e(6/9)
(D2 R2 [U' R2 B2 R2 B2 U) // HTR(8/17)
(L2 F2 U2] R2 F2) // LS(5/22)

[] = D U2 B2 L2 B2 L2 D R2 B2 D2(+1/23)

Somehow the only 22 from this dr uses 4q, and with all the other drs i didn't get to checking that. Mallard only finds really obscure 20s

Other:
R' B' 
L'
D2 U' F2 B2 L2 D R // 2c3 2e in 10, 22 opt from variations but skull path

R' B' 
(U L')
U R2 D2 L2 U' R // 4b2 4e in 10, 21 opt with 4q

R' F D' R' // EO(4/4)
B' // DR-4E4C(1/5)
F2 U D2 F2 U R2 F' // DR, 4b2 2e(7/12)
(F2 [U2 L2 D' F2 U]) // HTR(6/18)
(F' B L2 F' B') // LS(5-2/21)

[] = U' D' B2 D' L2 D(+1/22)

Pure luck

I had
D (D' R2 D)
R2 F
R' L B2 D2 B // 2c3 in 11 with variations on both sides but bad

But if you do R2 F' you can do D2 F2 L' R F' to dr, which leads to a free 21, but well

(L' R' F D) // EO(4/4)
(R' D2 L D2 R' F) // DR, 2c3 2e(6/10)
F2 U2 R D2 [R F2 R // HTR(7/17)
D2 B2 R2] D2 L2 // S slice(5/22)

[] = R' L2 B2 R U2 {F2 L2(+1/23) // adjust
{} = F B D2 R2 D2 F B'(+1/24)

This dr is 22 opt from switching D2 L, and my double slice is 23 opt but i was messing around with pairs tracing too much this attempt and had little time to find it

(R) B U B R // EO(5/5)
F // DR-4C2E, AR-3C1E, 2 pairs(1/6)
(D' F' D2 F) // DR, 2c4(4/10)
(D) U' F2 U F2 L2 D' // HTR(7/17)
R2 B2 U2 L2 D2 // finish(5-1/21)

Other funny drs:
(B) F D L B
R D' R U2 L // 2c4 in 10, this is literally the first eo i checked

(B) D2 F L B
U2 L F2 U' R // 4a2 2e in 10

This is probably the most fun i've had on a scramble this bad, lmao