I don't know what's happening recently, I can't get anything to work and get very bad results

(L) U2 R'
U' F' B2 L2 U' D F//4b2 4e (10) with 2 variants

They're both 22 optimal, one of them being findable with more time and more skill..
Just lost time on miss scrambles, and idk I got nothing else and started panicking..

Had nothing worth looking at after checking all my EO's and writing even more.
All Mallard solutions for 23 require something I did not find, an ARM I don't consider worth switching, or additional RZP.

Big skill issue :(

Only not horrible DR : 
(U' B R2 D' F)//EO(5) 7c8E ARM 2c1e I'm saved
B2 L2 B2 D' L' U//4a2 6e (11), two variants both 25 optimal

R' F R2 U//EO(4)
({R' B2 L'} F' L2 F)//2c3 2e (10)
R' B2 R' U2 R//HTR(15)
U2 D2 B2 U2 D2 R2//Slice(21)

Here 22 is slice optimal, but lets just check this HTR on variations
...{} = L' D2 R'//HTR(15)
(R2 D2 U2 B2 D2 U2)//Slice(21) Same HTR to leave slice that changes slice, but this one is actually +0

Any other workable DR I had was doomed but had slice in 21 early on
Cannot believe I missed the 20.... 

L U' R2 U//EO(4)
L' F2 L B' R' B'//4b2 4e(10)
L (F2 R U2 D2 R' D2 R)//HTR(18) (wen's path)
(D2 L2 F2 U2)//Slice(22)

+0

21.33 mo3
I only worked with 10 move DRs here, all my 8/9 were bad subsets, some 21's are findable on this scramble, one on my 2c3 in 10 but very weird HTR path

F' D2 B U//EO(4)
(U2 F2 R F L)//2c3 4e(9)
L2 B' L2 B' D2 B//HTR(15)
U2 R2 F2 L2 U2 B2 L2//Slice(7-1/21) found the other way and inserted M2's

[F' D2 B' R2 F]//solved(21)

Overwhelming scrambles where I did not have time to properly check all the 4 movers, was RZP in 5 too ambitious ?

(B') U D B//EO(4)
L'  D L2 B2 U' D2 R//4b2 2e (11)
(R2 U B2 U2 B2 U')//Extended HTR(17)
(R2 L2 F2 L2)//Solved(21)

Several 21 to choose from so wrote the funniest, missing the 20 from JZP in 5 is annoying though

(U2 D2 F')//EO(3)
(L') L2 D R2 B2 D R//2c4 (10)
(U F2 D) B2 U' B2 U//HTR(17)
B2 D2 R2 F2 L2//Slice(22)

+0

Can't analyse but probably a big strategy skill issue.
Given every 3/4 move I had, decided to go for RZP in 4 maximum, I think I do that way too much but otherwise I can't check every EO...

My only 10 move DR's were 2c4 or bad subsets, so 22 is fine but 22 is probably bad on this scramble...

(L F2 R)//EO(3)
(D' B) L2 U' B'//4a2 2e(8), every 2qt path is Hopeless so
U' F2 D F2 R2 B2 U' B2 U'//HTR(17)
F2 U2 F2 L2 U2//Solved(22)

Any other DR I had were not very promising so tried to find a +13/+14 with 4qt, guess this is fine

(D2 L) R B2 R//EO(5)
F R2 U' F2 D'//4c3(10) you would think you're saved from this scramble ?
U2 B (U2 D2 F' D2 F')//HTR(17)
(D2 [F2 D2 L2])//S Slice(21) but I mean this is awful

[(L R' D2 B2 L R)]//Solved(24)

My only usable sub 12 DR :(
23 is optimal but 5 qt, 24 is 3qt optimal for both variants which is insane)

I missed a variation of 
(F) B2 U2 D' B
F2 R' F2 L2 R2 U//4a2 8e :(
but you can slice for a 4e variant, 24 optimal

(D B) D B//EO(4)
U (R' D2 L' R2 U')//0c4 (10)
(R U2 L') R' D2 R//HTR(16)
(U2 L2 F2 L2 D2 B2 D2)//Slice(23) don't think I'd be using this...

+0, optimal but lucky already

Had the 9 to 4c3 for 21 but skill issued... I mean the only sub 23's are in the same path
Also had 10 2c3 that is 24 optimal and did not find anything on it obviously, an extension gives 22 tho :(

21 18 23 is quite a funny mean, 20.67

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT

Maybe the craziest scramble I have ever seen

With one EO checked, I had :
(L2 F)
(R L}) D' B2 R D2 R//2c3 2e (9)
U B2 [U R2 U//HTR(14)
B2 D2 R2 D2]//Double slice(18)
[D B2 D {F2 D2 L2 U2]//M slice(18)
{R' L D2 B2 L2 F2 L2}//+1 for 19

Technically there is a findable 18 for this after D, reswitch for other JZP side and gets 18
But I was so happy with uneasy 19 I even thought that I could not find better buutt

U2 F2 U//EO(3) 4c4e (a) with JZP so instant switch
(L2 U2 L2 F)//4c3(7) with variants on both sides, sadly it was bad and quickly decided it was not likely to be a 19

Then tried the variant of the EO and ...+4 to 4a2 4e ! Another DR in 7 wtf
D2 B2 U//EO(3)
B2 R B2 L//4a2 4e (7)
U2 B D2 B2 U2 R2 F'//HTR(14)
R2 D2 F2 D2//Solved(18) (i thought it was 17)

Amazing +11 direct finish !
I don't think I've ever had two completely different and findable 18's, found only the easiest one, but 21 18 is a good start !

(L R) R2 F' L//EO(5), randomly checked but...
D B' U//2c4(8) I mean why not ?
F (F2 L2 F' L2 F R2 D2 F')//HTR(17)
(U2 F2 D2 L2)//Slice(21)

+0 but scared me a bit. Happy with this as 21 wasn't given and for once I spent my time wisely I think

B R' F' U B'//EO(5)
(F2 D2 L U R)//4a1 2e(10) after the not amazing 4e variant 
L2 U (D' F2 L2 F2 D)//HTR(17)
(R2 B2 D2 B2)//Slice(21)

+0

Found a funny EO tho :
(F) F U L B, you can +6 on R/L for 11 0c4, but also:
R//DR-2e on UD, sadly this gives 4b4 for both sides.

(B U)//EO(2) ofc
(R' F) D2 L B L B'//2c3 6e (9)
R (R2 B2 D2 R D2 R)//HTR(16)
(F2 U2 F2 U2 R2 D2)//Slice(22)

+0

Found slice in 21 but no +0
Missed a 21 with double slice, did not check the pure parity HTR for some reason :(

(L' U B)//EO(3)
L2 D//JZP
R2 U2 R D2 L//2c3 2e 10
(D L2 B2 R2 L2 F2 U')//HTR(18)
(B2 U2 R2)//2e2e (21) but...
(L D2 R2 U2 R2 D2 L)//7-5 for 23.

My backup.
Somehow I did not at all check JZP variants from the other side, shows how out of shape I am.. Free 21 pretty much
I found this JZP pretty late though, checked all the 4 move EO's before switching the 3 mover and this was my last one, found the DR at 42mins I think, and forgot to switch JZP insanely

D B' D2 L'//EO(4)
(L2 B' D2 B' D)//2c4(9)
B (U2 F R2 F' R2 F')//HTR(16)
(L2 F2 D2 L2 D2)//slice (21)

No+0 unfortunately so 22 (not 100% sure these are exactly the correct post DR moves I do not have my paper sheet)
Nice to finish with 21.00, somehow on the best scramble I got the worst result. French NR except LMR could have sub21 on these..

F R B F' L'//EO
F2 D2 F U F//4b2 2e(10)
B2 U2 L2 B2 U B2 U'//HTR(17)
R2 U2 B2 L2//Slice (21)

Everything wide for +0

Basically the only promising DR found and easy 21, again feels more lucky than deserved

(F2 D L)//EO(3)
(U D F' B R2 D2 F' D)//4b2 6e (11)
D2 L2 {F' D2 B}'//HTR(16)
L2 D2 R2 B2//Slice(20)

{B' L2 F'}//Solved(20)

1st EO checked 2nd RZP found, got a linear 23 directly.
Then tried the 2nd 3 move EO and was so sure something was there but spent too much Time on nothing. Curious to see if some people commit on these 8+5 /9+4 with worst corners ever

Came back to these 2 11+2 after 45 and NISSing gave me underserved 20

(U2 F') U2 F//EO(4)
R' D2 B2 D' L' U //4b2 2e (10)
(D2 [R' B2 R')//HTR(14)
(F2 D2 R2 F2 D2 R2] F2)//Slice(21)

[L2 U2 B2 R2 U2 B2 L D2 L]//Solved(21)

My only sub 23 findable on all my DR's, had this slice pretty early on finish part so was an unstressful attempt

D R B L D//EO(5)
(F' B U2 F' L)//4a1 4e(10)
(B D2 [B L2 U2 L2 B)//HTR(17)
(R2 D2 B2] U2)//Slice(21)

[F U2 R2 U2 F L2 U2 F2]//Solved(21)

Happy because a lot too check and this was uneasy, also 21 is findable with 1q + double slice

(F' R' D L F)//EO(5)
U2 L2 D' R U' R'//2c3 4e
U2 B2 U F2 U' R2 F2 D//HTR(19)
R2 B F' R2 D2 B' F//Solved(7-2/24)

Lame solve, 4 good DR's and the only sub 24's are 2 weird HTR+double slice on the same DR

(D B2 L2 F)//EO(4)
F2 D B2 U R//4b2 2e (9)
L2 F2 D L2 D//HTR(14)
R2 F2 R2 [F2 L2 U2 F2//S Slice(7-1/20)

[B2 R2 D2 B U2 F' B']//Solved(21)

Backup 22 :
L2 U D2 L 
F2 L2 R2 D R2 D' F'//4b2 6e (11)
B2 U' R2 D'//HTR(15)
L2 F2 B2 L2 B2//Slice 20, +2

B2 D B' L'//EO(4)
F' R2 D' U2 F//2c3 4e (9)
(R2 U' L2 U F2%U)//HTR(15)
(L2 R2)//2e+slice(17)

%(F2 U2 B2 D2 B2 U2)//Slice(6-4/19) (basically this is just trying the extension)

B2 D B' L' F' R2 D' U2 F R2 L2 U B2 D2 B2 U L2 [U R2]

[D B2 U D']//Solved(21)

No +0 then no +1 then no +2 in the slicable part, this took forever !
And Mallard gives a 21 on original HTR and just +6 That I did not even consider.

(F2 L' F)//EO(3)
D R D2 F2 U//2c4(8)
R(D2 R F2 [R F2 U2 L')//HTR(16)
(U2 B2 D2 L2] B2 D2)//Slice(22)

[R2 U2 F2 D2 R F2 D2 L']//Solved(22)

3 2c4's in 8, 2 of them are 21 optimal but missed all of them (R U2 R') switch stuff which is not easy on scramble like this

(F) F2 U2 B'//EO(4)
R' B2 U L2 D' L'//2c4(10)
F2 [U' L2 D F2 D'] R2 D'//HTR(18)
L2 $F2 R2 F2 D2 L2 $B2//Slice(25) but insert S2 at $

L2 B2 L2 F2 U2 R2 F2//Slice(24)

[D' B2 D L2 U']//Solved(24)

My DR's were all terrible

10 to 4b4 garbage, 10 to 2c4 24 opt and also 10 to 2c4 that has a 22 but hard to find imo

L (D' B2 R)//EO of the year(4)
B2 D' R2 U2 F//2c3 4e(9)
(F2 D' F2 B2 L2 [U L2 U'])//HTR(17)
(R2 U2 F2)//S+E(3-1/19)

[D F2 D']//S Slice(19)

L B2 D' R2 {U2 F'} U2 R2 D F2 D' L2 F2 B2 D F2 R' B2 D
{F' B L2 B'}//Solved(21)

Again an early backup :
L (D' B2 R)//EO(4)
(F2 B2 D' L2 U2 B)//2c3 4e(10)
(R2 D R2 D' B2 D)//HTR(16)
(U2 F2 L2 B2 L2 D2)//Solved(22)

Amazing scramble but also amazing EO, too much work for 21 though
I missed the 9 to 2c4 also giving 21 oops.
21 is optimal on all the DR's I checked, so I'm happy about my solving this week

(F' L' F2 R)//EO(4)
(U' B D' B R2 B')//4b2 2e(10)
(R2 D B2 D')//HTR(14)
(L2 B2 R2 D2 R2 F2 U2)//Solved(21)

So sometimes you can win 2 moves on a solve just by trying some +2 RZP vibes !
2 minutes later you have a 21 backup and all your others DR will be 23 optimal :)

(U' R' B' R' D)//EO(5)
B' D2 R' B' L//2c4(10)
(B U2 L2 F U2 F' R2 D2 B)//HTR(19)
(U2 B2 D2 F2)//Solved(23)

Well after nothing in 30 minutes I switched a 7c8e -3c2e (which is underrated btw), and then easy 10 move DR and then a lot of square/square HTR, one giving this 23. Had some funny stuff but no good DR's worth looking at after all my EO's, satisfied with 23

(R' D' F)//EO(3)
L(U L2 U B2 L)//4b2 6e(9)
U' F2 D'//HTR(12)
[R2 D2 L2 U2 F2 R2 F2 R2]//Solved(20)

Then inserting some M2's :

[L2 U2 L2 D2 B2 R2 B2 L2]//Solved(19)

Well I'm not expecting to win this solve and given how I did on first 2 Probably losing this one.

(F2 R' D B')//EO(4)
 (U) R L2 U2 F2 U//2c3 2e (10)
(L' F2 U2 L' U2 D2 B2 R)//HTR(18)
(F2 B2 U2 F2 R2 U2)//Solved(6-1/23)

Unbelievable that I was not able to find better.
But in fact 23 was optimal for the 2 variants in 10, and on the 4 variants in 11 I checked there only is 1 22 that is quite unfindable regarding all I had to check

I did not choose to commit on the 2c4's in 10 instead for obvious subset reasons but of course there was 22 and 21 findable :(

R' B D' R//EO(4)
(D2 L2 B' U2 F' D)//2c3 6e (10) there are 4 ways to get DR in 10 so lest just try Trigger as it's setup
([B' U2 R2 B] L2 U2 B)//HTR(17)
(D2 L2 F2 R2 D2 R2)//Slice(6-1/22)

[F' U2 L2 F]//Solved(22)

I think this is the most DR's I've ever "checked"
(D' F B) U (R2 D2 R' F2 R2 D)//6 variants (that I found) of 10 to 4b2 4e

R' B D' R' B2 L2 B2 D2 F D//2 variants of 10 to 4b2 4e

And the 4 DR's in 10 that I last checked giving my final solution.

I only check obvious paths on all of those but 22 is optimal among all

D' F (L F)//EO(4)
(L2 B2 L R2 U R2 U])//2c3 4e (11)
R' B2 R2 B2 R F2 R//HTR(18)
L2 F2 [D2 L2 B2//Slice(23) but 22

[U2 R2 F2 U D2]//Solved(24) and then

{L2 F2 R B2 R'}//Slicing(23)

L (B R)//EO(3)
(L2 F D')//JZP(6)
R2 U2 B2 D//2c3 4e(10)
(B') [F2 L2 R2 F' L2 F//HTR(17)
R2 F2] D2 R2 D2//Slice(22)

[B2 L2 R2 B' D2 B L2 B2]//Solved(22)


There is a 21 on another variant with U2 D2 F + switch but I did not check that (bad time management led me to have multiple viable DR's but started checking them at 40+ )

F' (B' U2 R' B')//EO(5)
(R2 D' R2 L' D R)//2c3 4e (11)
R2 [U' R2 U' L2 F2 U'//HTR(18)
F2 B2 D2] F2 L2//Slice(23)

[D' F2 U' B2 L2 D' F2 B2 U2]//Solved(23)

(F L' B D)//EO(4)
(R' F' L2 U2 L F)//4b2 4e (10)
([R' D2 B2 R2 D2 L)//HTR(16)

then first
(L2 F2 R2 D2 B2 D2)//Slice(6-1/21)
Solved in +2/23

So went for
(U2 L2 F2 R2] B2 D2)//Slice(22)
[(L' F2 D2 R2 F2 R D2 L2 B2 L2)]//Solved(22)

Somehow it's not DR optimal, there is a 21 with 4qt starting with half turn on both sides so I'm fine not finding it

0/3 DR Optimal this week, skill issue 10/10

D' B F2 U//EO(4)
(R' L')//JZP(6)
F2 B2 L B2 R//2c3 4e (11)
(B L2 D2 F R2 F)//HTR(17)
(D2 L2 D2 B2 D2 B2)//S Slice(23)

[R D2 R' L2 F2 U2 F2 U2 R2]//Solved(24)

Wtf about me not checking 1 move to 8 bad EO's at all on this scramble

R (F L')//EO(3)
(B) D2 R2 D F2 D F//4b2 4e(10)
(L2 U) L2 U2 L2 F2 U'//HTR(17)
R2 B2 L2 U2 R2//Solved(22)

Sadly I did not find the 21 on variation, but idk if I could have having switched (L2 U)

Good solved because there was a lot to try and had a lot of mid promising DR's, I checked several ones and I bet on the good one.

U D2 F//EO(3)
(B2 L' U)//JZP(6)
L2 {D' F2 D//2c3 4e(10)
(R2 F2 [L' B2 L] D2 L)//HTR(17)
(U2} L2 F2)//M+E slice(20)

[R' U2 R]//E-slice 20

{U' R2 U' D2 B2 R2 D2}//Solved(21)

JZP optimal again, very happy with my solves this week.
Taking a break was maybe not that bad.

(R U2 B2 U')//EO(4)
(L') {R2 U2 R U2 L}//4b3(10)
(U2 B'] L2 B)//Reduce to 4a1(14)

{L2 D2 L B2 R}//Change variation(+0/14)

D2 [B//HTR(16)
D2 L2 B2 D2 R2//Slice(21)

[F L2 U2 F2 R2 U2 B' D2 F]//Solved(21)

Very happy again, JZP variants paying off, had also 4b2 4e in 10 that was 24 optimal :(

D (U L2 D')//Rare instance of me finding this EO
(F) R2 D2 R' B L F//2c3 4e (11)
(R2 B2 [L U2 R' B2 R'])//HTR(18)
(D2 F B' U2 F B')//Slice(6-2/22)

[L U2 R F2 L2 R]//Solved(23)

Unique optimal, was not obvious + rare EO + 7c8e RZP, on this scramble I'm happy

(U2 B U R F)//EO(5)
D2 R' U' R//2c4(9)
F2 D B2 [U' R2 U] L2 B2 U//HTR(18)
R2 F2 U2 F2 D2//Slice(23)

[D' F2 D]//Solved(23)

Hating 2c4 episode 2...
Also had 4b2 in 10 and variations but only had time for 2qt and sub 23 is not possible somehow on all of them and the 2c4

Well that's a nice mean to start :(

(L2 R2 B R)//EO
(D U' B2 U F')//2c4(9)
(U R2 B2 [U' L2 U R2 F2 U'//HTR(18)
(F2 D2] F2 B2 L2)/Slice(23)

[U2 B2 D L2 F2 U' B2 D]//Solved(23)

Unbelievable...
Checked the 8's to 2c4 and did not find better than 23 to slice without +0 I could find...

Had this backup slice to 23 but honestly how is it possible that I do 23 on this solve and 22 on 1.1 ? I thought I missed something but there is no reasonnable sub 23 on ALL my DR's writtent (all 2c4...). Or did I miss something ?

(U L) D' F L//EO(5)
(U' R2 F2 B' U B')//4b3(11)
R2 [D (U2 F2 U F2 U])//HTR(18)
(F2 R2 D2 L2)//Slice(22)

[U B2 U2 B2 R2 D']//Solved(22)

After 40 minutes just this DR and one 11 on 2c4 on same RZP.
Somehow there's a 22 but it could have been a 24, why is official not like this ?

D(L D')//EO(3)
F' B2 R' B2 R'//4b2 6e (8)
B R2 D2 [B D2 B D2 B'//HTR(16)
U2 B2] U2 L2 B2//Slice(21)

[F L2 F U2 B' D2 F2]//SOlved(21)

Missed 20 from extension because I was dumb enough not to try it, I guess there's room for improvement in my decisions