B (U L' F)//EO(4)
D2 F2 U2 L' D L//4a2 4e(10)
B2 U B2 U2 L2 D'//HTR(16)
L2 R2 B2 D2 B2 F2 R2//Finish(23) (found with S slice in 21 but didn't cancel with EO)

A lot of 10 move DR's bud bad subsets and 23 feels like shit on this scramble where I checked for RZP in 4

F2 B' L' D'//EO(4)
F' B//JZP(6)
(B' R2 B)//DR(9) 2c3 2e
R F2 R' F2 R'//HTR(14)
U2 F2 D2 L2 F2 D2 L2//Solved(21)

I first found F2 B' L' D'//EO(4)
F' B//JZP(6)
R F2 R' F2 R'//4b2(11) where I tried non NISS HTR's on several variations. I would have found the same solution on inverse which is funny and quite rare

(U B' R F U)//EO
(F2 B2 R' F2 L B)//DR(11)
(R' B2 L') U2 B2 L//HTR(17)
F2 L2 F2 U2 B2//Slice(22)

(D B' R' L2 D)//EO(5)
(F) R B2 F R' F' //DR(11) 2qt 4e4c
(U2 R]) L B2 U2 R U2 R'//HTR(8/19)
D2 [R2 U2 B2 D2 B2//Slice(25)

[L2 D2 F2 U2 F2 R L2]//Solved(+1/26)

Meh not even +0

(B2 R F D)//EO(4)
(R' L2 B' R2 U2 F L)//DR(11) 3qt 2c4e
B (L2 D2 L2 B D2 B)//HTR(7-1/17)
(D2 L2 D2 B2 L2 D2)//Solved(23)

Optimal is 22 but weird choice of QT of progress that I would not try
Even more true because I also had

(D L F L')
(B) D B2 R2 U B2 D B //12+1 4e4c

Here is the disappointment
(B2 U2 R2 B2 L2 U)//HTR(17)
(L2 U2 B2 R2) slice in 21 but not +1

Just had to do
(B2 U2 R2 B2 L2 U')
(B2 U2 L2 U2 R2)//Solved for 22, I'm so mad I missed that
Optimal for this is also 22

L F B’ U//EO(4)
(F2 L R2 F’ R’)//DR(9)
(F) U2 D2 L2 [B R2 L2 U2 F//HTR(17)
L2 U2 L2 F2] D2 R2//Slice(23)

[B2 F’ U2 D2 L2 B R2 D2 R2 B2]+1 // 24

Missed a 21 on a trigger I checked with U but not with U’
Lots of 21 with U’ so I’m disappointed even though the scramble was bad

(B F L F)//EO(4/4)
L' U' R' U F2 U//DR(6/10) 3qt 2c4e
(L]) F2 D2 F2 L U2 [L'//HTR(7/17)
D2 B2 D2 R2 B2 D2//Slice(23)

[R2 L U2 F2 U2 L R D2 F2 R']//(+2/25)

20 is findable on a HTR path that I didn't check :( :(

L' B2 R' (U2 D2 L)//HTR(6/16)
U2 D2 B2 R2//Solved(20)

The only thing I didn't try that was reasonable so kind of mad (+2 slice ruined the attempt anyway

(F B' D)//EO(3)
F (R' L2 U2 D2 F)//DR(9) 4qt 4c
([L' F2 L] F2 R2 U2 R' B2 R)//HTR(18)
(D2 L2 F2 U2 L2 U2 L2)//Slice(25)

[R' D2 R]//solved(25)

Optimal is 22 with 6qt, a lot of 23 with 6qt but none with 4qt...

Of course had (F B' D R) F' D2 L //DR (7) 4qt 4c but worst corner case ever, could not figure out a short way to HTR, turns out it was +13 so better than mine for a 20.
I wonder if it was findable but without knowing the maze, I'm sure I would not have, maybe if I spent 40 minutes on it but already had the 9+4 and didn't risk it

(U B2 R) // EO(3/3)
(F' D' R2 L2 B' D B' D)//DR(8/11)4qt 2c
R2 B' D2 F U2 [F' U2 F//HTR(8/19)
L2 F2 D2 R2 F2] R2//Slice(25)

[B' R2 B L2 B2 U2 L2 B2]//Solved(+0/25)

Optimal for DR sadly.
Had a bunch of 11+4, and a 12+3 2c2e, but no better DR, even though the scramble looked good

(F D' F')//EO
(U L' U2 L R2 U)//DR(9)2qt 4e
D2 B2 R F2 D2 [L'//HTR(15)
B2 D2] F2 L2 U2//Slice(19)

[R' U2 B2 R L']//21, sadly optimal

There is a 20 with 4q but would not have found it

B R D F' L//EO(5/5)
(R2 B F R2 F' U)//DR(11)
(F' R2 U2 F' D2 F D2 F')//HTR(19)
(R2 U2 L2 B2 D2)//Slice(24)

+2 horrible slice :(

L (F2 B L)//EO
B2 D B2 U B//DR 2qt 4e2c (9)
D (L2 F2 R2 D B2 D' B2 D)//HTR(9/17)
(U2 B2 R' L' D2 R L)//Finish(24)

DR is 21 optimal, 4qt but differently :(

(U^) D B2 L2 U^ B2 U//HTR(16)
F2 D2 F2 L2 B2//Slice(21) 
^w+0

I probably would have found this if the D didn't transform in 3qt 2c2e with 17 HTR and cool finish. Found the DR pretty late and also his evil twin

L' (F2 B L)
D' L2 B2 D B//DR4qt(9)

that I did check a little instead of findinf better than 24...

U R L //EO(3/3)
(D2 F2 L2 U2 B' D B)//DR(7/10)
(D') F2 R2 U' R2 B2 D //HTR(7/17)
F2 L2 F2 B2 U2 R2//Slice(6/23)

+2 for 25 :(

L U R B D'//EO(5/5)
B F L2 B F' L//DR(6/11)
(B' D2 [B L2 F2 L2 U2 F)//HTR(8/19)
(U2 L2 U2 L2 U2 B2])//Slice(6/25)

[F U2 B2 D2 L2 B D2 R2 D2 R2 D2 F2]//Solved(12-12/25)