R' B2 F' R' // EO
U (L2 F B U2 B' D) // DR
R2 L2 B R2 U2 B // HTR
L2 D U' L2 F2 U' D // Solved 

Didn't find many good DR's on this tbh, happy with the lucky finish on DR in 11

B' D' // EO
L (R L2 D2 B' L2 B' R) // DR
(F L2 F2 R2 F' D2 F) // HTR
(R2 D2 R2 D2) // S in 21, solved in 22

The 8+5 DR that my DR is derived from gets 21 optimal & it seems somewhat findable, but I had better things to check on this scramble...

(F) U B' // EO
L (U D2 [R B2 L]) // DR
U // Reduce to 1q

[] = (L' D2 R' L' F2 L') // Force short HTR

(U) // HTR
(R2 U R2 B2 F2 L2 D) // Solved in 21 (but also 19 to slice solved in +2 rip)

Had another 19 to slice from this DR that was less deranged but that also didn't +0 or +1 and I found this first :P

Definitely feel like there's at least a 20 lurking on this start but maybe not

EDIT: there's a 20 but only one possible and it needs 4q so idc about missing that

Found (U B) L B' L U' B U' B which would normally be a safe 20-22, instead the only 22's on this DR are either 5q or cursed NISS 3q paths :)))

Also got heavily distracted during the attempt to the point where I'm considering relocating!!! FMC is fun!!!

F' B2 U' // EO
(F' R) B' D2 F2 R // DR
(B' D2 F2 L2 B D2 B') // HTR (also FR)
(L2 U2 R2 D2) // Solved

Nice!

(U2 L) B R' // EO
B' (D L2 F2 U R2 F) // DR
(B2 D) L2 U // HTR :o
R2 L2 B2 R2 L2 D2 F2 // Solved 

22.00 mo3, not the worst thing ever!!!!

D B2 U R // EO
(F B , U B2 D' B) // DR
U' (L2 D R2 D' R2 D) // HTR
(R2 B2 L2 F2) // 21 to slice, solved in +2 because even when 2c4 is good it needs to find a way to suck somehow

You can insert a U' between the F B combo on inverse to get 11+1 but everything was bad on that. Only other decent thing I really found was F D' L F B (D F2 U2 F2 U' F) which instantly gave me 18 to 2E + slice but without any good way to do the 2E. Still would have probably investigated it more if 

F2 U D2 L2 B // EO
D , L2 U2 L F2 U' // DR
(F2 R' D2 R' U2 R) // HTR
(L2 B2 D2 B2) // Solved!

Very proud of this solution! I derived the DR from first finding F2 U' R2 F followed by either R2 D2 L' B2 D into meh 2c4, or D R2 D2 L F2 U into good 2c4 for the cost of a move

After exhausting all of my options there + getting trolled by 20 to slice without any +2's I could find from (R L) B2 L2 D F R2 U F2 U2 L, I decided to try the +1 extension of the EO from those aforementioned DR's to see if it gave a similar case. Worked better than expected!

10 move finish from a DR is a bit lucky tbf, but I really struggled to find anything from my 4 movers (though I didn't get around to checking D ([F' L2] U) on normal)

D B' L' U D // EO
(L) B2 L2 F U2 R // DR
(R2 F L2 F L2 F') // HTR
(U2 R2 U2 F2 D2 B2) // Solved 

Bad attempt

(R2 D F B) // EO
(L2 D' U2 R B2 L') // DR 5q :)))))
R2 D F2 U^' R2 U^ L2 D' B2 L2 U // HTR
B2 R2 // Leave slice

^ - w // Solved in 23

I found no viable sub 12/11 DR's so had to settle with this smh

B' L B2 R2 F // EO 
(L2 R' B2 R' D2 L D) // DR extension (M2 at start of line)
(R) L' // HTR in 14
F2 D2 B' F' R2 B' F // Solved in 21!!!

There was a LOT to check from this start given the nice HTR subset along with a very easy to manipulate EO

I found this cool HTR for example:

B' L R2 F B D2 B' , L (R F2 R' U2 L U , R)

Also had two different 9+4's along with a 10+2c3 and 10+2c4 but didn't find much there

(R' F' D' L' U') // EO
(R' B2 F R2 B' U2 R) // DR
(^ F2 U2 F') U2 R2 F' D2 R2 F' // HTR

^ // U2 // Better HTR

D2 F2 U2 R2 // 26 to slice xd

I wasn't remotely prepared for the 8c8e 11+4 2c4 circus, certain I missed at least a 23 from it (possibly a 22?) but too unfocused :(

(R2 B D) // EO
[F B] (B2 L' D2 R2 F D2 B') // DR in 12 but it's 1q with lots of variations so it's fine maybe

[] = L2 F B // Force short HTR

R2 U2 L // HTR in 16
U2 B2 D2 R2 D2 // Solved in 21 lol

Only sub 10 DR I found on this was U B' R B (L D B' U B) which also gave me 21 to slice but no +0

B' (U R D' F) // EO
F2 R' U2 D L' U' // DR
F2 & R' F2 D2 L' B2 L // HTR
U2 // 2E2E + slice in 19

& F2 U2 B2 R' F2 D2 B2 L' // 8-4=23 to slice, low time = couldn't find +0 or +1 :(

Also had 24 to slice from U L' B F' D' L2 F' U2 D2 L, but I was hoping I wouldn't need a safety 24 xD

Very hard attempt. Probably should have looked at more RZP in 6 with/without NISS instead of EO spamming since I only had 3 semi-viable DR's on this scramble (the third being (R U F' U' L B2 R2 B D B2 U) which is 2c4)

F' L U R // EO
U2 F' U' // DR
(L2 U2 F' U2 F2 L2 U2 F') // HTR
(U2 F2 R2 D2 U2 F2) // Solved 

Missed the unique 20 sadge 

L2 B L2 F // EO
(F2 U B2 U' [L U2 R] ) // DR
U' L2 U' // Reduce to good 1q (exact same theme as A1 lol)
[] = (R' L2 F2 L') // Arbitrary +1
(F2 B2 D') // HTR
(B2 R2 L2) // 21 to E solved in +1

Also had a bunch of seemingly useless HTR in 14 from this;

F B (U R' L D B2 L B' R B) 11+1, replace normal with R2 or L2 followed by 4 more moves to HTR but they all sucked after I passed through them 2-3 times (flipping to get DR in 13 made things worse!!! yay!!!)

B [U' B2 U] // EO
(F' , B2 D2 B R F) // DR
(U2 B2 U2 R') // Reduce to "good" 1q (or bounding I suppose lol)
[] = D U2 L2 D // Force short normal cont
F2 R // HTR
F2 U2 D2 R2 U2 L2 // 23 (22 to slice as well but no +0)

At around 55 min I realized I forgot to note a DR variation, and the 3rd or 4th thing I found on it was 21 to x2 slice using the same EO :/ 

Expected more from this scramble but I honestly didn't have more than one standout DR which was same EO + (B L2 F L F)... Maybe I missed a 22 by not checking lots of 4q on it?