D' R' L' B D //EO
F L U2 R2 B' //DR
R' F2 U2 L' F2 L //HTR
F2 D2 F2 U2 //finish

Also looked at:
(B D L2 F') 
(D L U' L2 D R) //10+1

(L U' B R')
(U2 L2 B2 U B2 U2 D' F) //12+2
([B2 L2] U F2 U F2 U2) //19 to 3e
[] = L R' U2 L R //22

(L U' B R) U //insane RZP on both normal and inverse, stuff constantly looks almost solved, but it's 5q DRs everywhere.
Didn't find Radek's 19 tho, minor skill issue.

U B' R F' //EO
R (L2 D R2 D R) //DR 10+3 4c4e
D' (F2 U' L2 [U2 L2 B2 D) //HTR
(L2 R2 B2 U2] R2 B2) //leave slice
[ ] = D2 R2 F2 D L2 R2 F2 D2 //solve slice (+0)

DR is 23 optimal and one of the paths is hilarious and might be the highlight of my week:
... R' (...R')
B' L2 B' L2 B2 D2 B U' F B L2 F' L2
Easy 4c3 -> 4b2 4e aside, I wonder if people will ever start finding stuff like this

B' F D' F//EO
(U2 F2 U F2 L' D R) //DR 11+3 2c4e
U (U' B2 D B2 % D U') //2e2e
% = B2 L2 B2 R2 F2 R2 //6-2

Not the first time i miss a good result of a blocky 10+5
Optimal for EO tho, that's nice

(R2 L B' U) //EO
D2 F' D2 R' F2 B2 L //DR 11+3 2c4e
(B R2 D2 B L2 B) //HTR
B2 D2 L2 F2 D2 //finish

(B2 L B')
(R') L F2 D2 R' U2 R' //DR 10+4 2c4e
(U') B2 [D F2 D' F2 D] //HTR
B2 L2 B2 L2 B2 //leave slice
[ ] = U L2 D U2 R2 U //solve slice (+1)

I believe this is DR optimal, but checking DRs with these long JZP sequences with NISSY is non-trivial

D (R B' D) //EO
(F) L R2 B L B //DR 10+4 2c4e
(B2 R' D2 R F2 R' B2 R') //HTR
(D2 R2 D2 F B' D2 F' B) //finish

DR is 23 optimal but tricky. I also looked at the other variant (23 opt) and at:
D (R B' D)
(F L R F2 B' L' B' L) //12+0 2e, 23 opt
D (R B' D)
(F L' R' F' B2 L' F' L) //12+0 4e, 23 opt

I really should've found AT LEAST one of the 23s, but I was just too chaotic an missed them all.

(U' F2 D) //EO
(L' F' D2 B U2 L) //DR 9+4 2c6e
(D2 F) U2 F' D2 L2 B' L2 B' //HTR
R2 F2 U2 //finish

B' (L2 F') //EO
(R) U2 L2 U' R //DR 8+3 2c6e
D F2 D L2 F2 B2 [U' //HTR
B2 U2 F2 L2 U2] //leave slice in 20
[ ] = U D2 F2 U2 B2 R2 D2 //solve slice (+1)

DR is 20 opt and I had multiple slices in 20 but not the right one sadly.

(L' B' D F) //EO
R D' F2 L F2 D // DR 10+3 2c4e
L' B2 L D2 F2 R //HTR
L2 D2 F' B D2 B2 U2 F B //finish

DR is 22 optimal. Silly miss, but i was looking at (...) R D B2 R' B2 D variant and only realized about this very late into the attempt.

U2 R U2 R //EO
B (U' R2 L2 U' B') //DR 10+1 4c4e
(F2 L2 F2 L2 D') //HTR
B F' L2 D2 B' F D2 L2 //finish

Other variant has a 21 but it's a tricky one as you have to U R2 S2 R2 U extend the DR.
Also looked at:
U' R U R //EO
D2 B' U R2 D' B //10+3 2c2e, 22 opt

(D F) R F' B //EO
(L2 D R' B2 U) //DR 10+3 2c4e
(B2 D2 R D2 R' U2 R) //HTR
D2 B2 U2 R2 U2 B2 //finish

This DR has a simple 20 after R F' B => R U2 F' B extention. For some reason i checked R D2 F' B and went on.

(B U2 L) //EO
(B') D' B2 U F //DR 8+4 2c4e
(D' B2 D L2 B2 D B2 D') //HTR
(L2 B2 L2 D2 B2 L2) //finish

DR is 20 optimal and easy to find. Not sure what went wrong

(D' F' L' U) //EO
(R F B) U2 D2 F' //10+4 0c4e
R D2 R (L' F2 R') //HTR
(F2 U D F2 L2 U' D') //finish

DR is 21 optimal

(F' D) //EO
L' F R U2 D2 F2 L2 F //DR 10+3 2c6e, infinity variants
R F2 B2 D2 L F2 L //HTR
F2 L2 F2 B2 //leave slice in 21, +1

not even sure how to find optimal for this with NISSY, hopefully someone used it as final

(U2 R') //EO
(B' D) B U' F2 U //DR 8+2 4c4e
D2 F' L2 U2 [B2 D2 F] //HTR
U' D B2 U' D' //leave slice 
[ ] = F B L2 B //solve slice (+1)

So much good stuff and only a 20 in the end.
Spent too much time on
(U2 R')
(D' B U2 B2 R2 B2 U) //9+4 infinity variants

There's a cool 19 after a 3 move setup to 7c6e 5-mover. 
Tried some similar stuff but didn't spot this one

(B' U' D L) //EO
(F) D R2 D' B2 U R2 B' //DR 12+2
U B2 U2 L2 U' //HTR
D2 F2 D2 F B' U2 F' B //finish
this is sliceable to 23, what am i doing...

F R B2 U' & //EO
R F' L F2 R2 U2 B // DR 11+2
L' F2 L2 B2 L' R2 // leave 3e in 17
& = F U' D R2 U D' F //solve 3e (7-0)

(R2 B D2 R) //EO
(U B' D' B D' F' D B) //DR 12+2
(B2 D B2 [D') //HTR
(L2 B2 U2] B2 R2) //leave slice in 21
[ ] = U D2 R2 F2 D2 //solve slice (+1)

One of the most epic EO->DR that I remember doing. 2 move RZP based on vibes -> fun 5 move trigger

(L U' L') //EO
(B') U2 F2 B2 L2 D B //DR 10+2
R2 [U B2 L2 D2] L2 D //HTR
F2 L' R F2 L R' //leave slice
[ ] = U' D2 F2 R2 U2 //solve slice (+1)

(L' D B) //EO
(U2 D R D L U L) //DR 10+2
(F2 D2 L2 F2 U R2 D) //HTR
(R2 B2 L2 F2 D2) //finish

The DR is a 4-cycle of edges and a bunch of 2-swaps, so normal and inverse are very similar. All the same HTRs work, and they are all H-perm from their "twin" on the other side of the scramble. Very wierd

(F' D2 R B') //EO
(U' D') B2 U //DR
(L' F2 U2 L U2 D2 F2 R) //HTR
(B2 D2 B2 U' B2 U2 B2 U2 B2 U) //finish (10-4)

(D' B' D2 B') //EO
(U' B2 D R' D' L') //DR 10+3 2c4e
R2 D L2 U F2 U //HTR
D2 F B L2 F' B' //finish

meltdown when
F' D2 F U2 R D L2 F2 U L //10+2
F' D2 F L R (U2 R D R) //9+5
F' D2 F L (L2 R2 B2 U D' R) //10+4 infinity variants
F' D2 F U2 R' U B2 U' L2 D L //11+3 2c2e
U2 F' D2 F R D L2 F2 U L //10+4
(D F2 U R L' B F' R F R) //11+3 2c2e
all wouldn't solve. realistically should've inserted slice in 24 or something

(D F' D2 B) //EO
D (D2 B2 R F2 L' D') //DR
R2 B2 L' B2 L' D2 F2 U2 L //HTR
U2 R2 B2 //finish

(D' L D') //EO
(R' B) F2 U2 R F2 R' D2 F //DR 12+2 4c2e
(D2 [R' U2 L2 U2 R']) //HTR
(B2 U2 F2 L2 U2 D2) //leave slice
[ ] = L' B2 L' R' U2 R' //solve slice