(R' L2 U L')
(D) U' F U2 B' U // 2c3 4e (10)
(B R2 D2 B R2 B)
(R2 B2 R2 F2 U2 R2) // slice (22) +0 = 22


there's no way I would've chose to write 5 movers on that axis
(R' D' F' D' L)   // eolr               (5/5)
D2 L2 U2 F        // drud-eolr [2c3 4e] (4/9)
L2 U' F2 D (U')   // htr-drud           (5/14)
(F2 U2 B2 L2 B2)  // fin                (5/19)

for the same reason, no
(R D' F' D' L)       // eolr               (5/5)
F2 R2 U2 R2 B'       // drud-eolr [2c3 4e] (5/10)
D' L2 D2 R2 D' R2 D  // htr-drud           (7/17)
D2 B2 R2 B2 L2       // fin                (5-2/20)

I tend to not find 3qt EOs
(U' R' U L D)       // eoud               (5/5)
B' D2 F2 L' B' L'   // drfb-eoud [4b2 2e] (6/11)
(R2 F2 L2 B R2 F')  // htr-drfb           (6/17)
(D2 R2 B2 D2)       // fin                (4/21)

other than that, good ig

other DRs:
B' L2 F, L D R D2 L F2 R2 D //4b2 4e (11) 24 optimal (didn't check this because 4b2 4e recently has been pissing me off)
B' L2 F' L D (R' D R2 D) //2c4 (9) 23 optimal  I found a 23 slice but didn't solve it... maybe that was optimal???

(F B R')
(U) F' R2 L2 F' D' //2c3 (9)
B (F' R2 F')
(U2 L2 D2 B2 R2) //slice (18) +0=18

PB !!!
also scramble optimal !!!

U2 R (B' R)
(B2 U F2 L2 B U' F) //4a1 4e (11)
D' F2 L2 F2 U' R2 U
B2 D2 B2 R2 B2 //slice (23) +1=24

there is a findable 23 (which is optimal) for this DR

all my other DRs were 12 2c3/4s, that I didn't really check

rip... wrong DR from the right EO...
U2 R (B' R')          // eolr               (4/4)
(L2 D B2 R2 B U' F')  // drud-eolr [4a1 4e] (7/11)
B2 R2 D               // htr-drud           (3/14)
L2 D2 R2 U' D         // fin                (5/19)

B U' L' B
U' R2 U2 R' B2 U' //4b2 2e (10)
(F2 U2 B2 L U2 R)
(D2 B2 L2 D2) //slice (20) +1=21

dr optimal
didn't even have time to check all sub5 lol

other DRs: 
D2 R (D' L) U' D2 B U B //4b2 4e (9) 21 opt only with 4q (pretty unfindable imo)
D2 R (D' L' U D' L2 F D' F) //4a1 4e (10) also 21 opt with 3q, through 1 move reduction to 0c0 4e and switch, so pretty findable

L' (R' D' R)
(B) U2 V2 U2 R2 F //2c3 4e (10)
(U2 F2 U' F2 U' R2 F2 D)
(F2 D2 B2 U2 R2 F2 L2) //slice (25) +0=25

23 optimal
couldn't find much

other DR:
(D R' B2 U' L' B2 U2 R2 U2 D B) //4b2 2e (11) also 23 optimal

I had this EO but didn't check it becuase of time constraints
L2 D (L R' D)            // eoud               (5/5)
(F R2 F' L)              // drfb-eoud [2c3 2e] (4/9)
B' R2 D2 U2 B' L2 D2 B'  // htr-drfb           (8/17)
R2 F2 U2                 // fin                (3/20)

this +1 extension of my DR gives a 22
L' (R' D' R)         // eolr               (4/4)
(B)                  // rzpud-eolr         (1/5)
U2 L2 B2 U R2 F'     // drud-eolr [2c3 4e] (6/11)
U' B2 U2 B2 U' F2 U  // htr-drud           (7/18)
F2 B2 R2 U2          // fin                (4/22)

(R L) F' R'
B (B2 U2 F2 D' L2 U2 B) //4b2 2e (12)
U R2 D
L' R U2 R' L' F2 B2 //fin (21)

I did this when solving it to rescramble, which is mainly the reason why I got this lol
(B2 F2 L2 F2 D' R2 U') //wrong slice in 18
(F L2 F' B L2 B') //fin (23)

I misscrambled and wrote a ton of EOs which wasted time, but this appeared lol

(U L2 B D)
(B R) F' L2 B U2 B L' //4b2 2e (12)
(F' D2 B')
(L2 U2 L2 D2 R2 B2 D2) //fin (22)

would've been completely screwed if I didn't find this DR, because the other DRs I had were 12 4c4,  13 4a2 2e, 13 2c3 4e

mallard gives 22s even with RZP in 6, so this is good

(L) U2 F2 B' R'
(B D2 B L2 F2 U) //4a3 (11)
(B2 L2 B' R2 F2 D2 F D2 F)
(D2 L2 D2) //slice (23) +0=23 

other DRs
(L U2 D' F R) F R2 F D //4a4 (9) 23opt
F' (D' R' L B) R' L2 D' R2 D //2c3 8e (10) 22 optimal WHAT
(L U2 F D' R' F' U2 B' L2 F U) //4a3 (11) 24 optimal

saaad I almost had this DR
F (D' L R' B)          // eofb               (5/5)
B2 L' R2 U' L2 U       // drlr-eofb [2c3 4e] (6/11)
F2 U2 L' F2 L (D2 L')  // htr-drlr           (7/18)
(U2 B2)                // fin                (2/20)

(D) U2 L2 D'
B' L D2 F2 L' R2 B' //2c3 4e (11)
(U2 R U2 R F2 D2 R')
(U2 B2 U2 B2 L2 D2) //fin (24)

23 opt from DR, findable by switching after this 1q reduction...

other DR:
(D) U2 L2 D B' F2 R' B L' B //4c4 (10) 24 optimal with 6qt lol
(D) U2 L2 D B' F2 R' D2 B L' B //2c4 (11) 23 opt

I have zero clue why I missed this when I had the EO and checked it
L D U2 B           // eofb               (4/4)
F2 L F2 D L2 D     // drlr-eofb [4a1 2e] (6/10)
(R' D2 U2 R B2 L') // htr-drlr           (6/16)
(B2 D2 L2)         // fin                (3/19)

F B' (U B)
D (D2 R' L' U2 L D') //4c3 2e (11)
(L) B2 U2 D2 R B2 R'
U2 L2 B2 D2 B2 D2 //slice (24) +0=24

would've found the 23 off of this DR if I chose to bound it, but I was experimenting a new noting format so it kinda didn't fit the new style

that also means I confused myself with my own notes lol

R2 U B' D2 L'
F D' B' D2 F D //2c3 4e (11)
(F' L2 F R2 U2 F')
(U2 R2 D2 R2) //double slice + z2 (21) +2=23 wow

yeah and IDK how I missed this 22... I swear I checked this
nissy-# solve drfin -o R' U' F L' F2 D' B2 U' B2 L' F2 U' F2 D2 B2 R' F2 L2 F2 D2 B' R' U' F R2 U B' D2 L' F D' B' D2 F D'
U2 F2 U2 D2 F' D2 F D2 B U2 B2 (11)
U2 B2 U2 D2 B' R2 F R2 F U2 B2 (11)

mallard also gives quite a few 21s, so this is genuinely on me

(R) F2 R'
D2 F' (U2 F2 B2 D' F') //2c4 (10)
B2 D' (U' F2 U' F2 U')
(L2 F2 D2 L2 B2) //slice (22) +0=22

didn't check all sub5 EOs because I kinda felt tired

(and I genuinely missed this DR)
(B U2 R F)              // eofb               (4/4)
(U2 R' F2 U2 R2 F2 U')  // drlr-eofb [4b2 4e] (7/11)
D2 R' (F2 L')           // htr-drlr           (4/15)
U2 B2 L2 D2             // fin                (4/19)

(L' U' B' L2 D')
L' R' F2 B' L' B //4a2 2e (11)
(R' F2 R2 D2 F2 D2 F2 L')
(U2 F2 L2 F2 L2 U2) //slice (25) +0=25

24opt.
nothing came out of the DRs I found

other DRs
(L' B' U' L2 D) L2 B R2 B //2c5 (9) 22 optimal lol but didn't check this... and the D' B2 U variation of the EO gives a 21!?!?!? I wish 5q wasn't a thing
R (L' R2 U' R) (U) B2 L2 U L2 F2 U //4b2 2e (12) 24 opt

the good stuff is in the stuff that I miss or don't check, as usual

D' B (L' D B')
(D2 L2 F2 L' U') //4b2 2e (10)
(D2 F2 L) D2 L2 U2 F2 L'
F2 B2 R2 F2 //slice (22) +0=22

wow, another horrible scramble. I just got lucky with this 2+3.
optimal from this DR

another DR I had was from the same EO,
R' U2 R2 F2 R D //2c3 4e (11) 23 opt.

20/23 sub6 EOs found (I missed the +1 extension from the 2+2 lol)

(F D' L F' U)
F' U2 R2 F' L' B2 R' //2c3 4e (12)
B' L2 F R2 D2 R2 L2 F
D U' F2 U D // slice (23) +2=25

optimal +2

that was a tough scramble
43/72 sub6 EOs found

I only had this and
(L U' L' F D, B2 R' D2 B' L' F) //4a3 (11) 25 opt
as my DRs... 7c8e and 4c6e trigger lol

L B' U D R
D' R2 B2 U' F //0c4 4e (10)
D L2 D (B2 U' B2 D2 F2 L2 F2 D)
(R2 D2 F2) //slice (24) +0=24

a ton of 4 movers (+3 3movers) on FB didn't give any sub12 DRs then checking the 5 movers I wrote, got an 11 to 2c5 and this, so I kinda just went for this

I had a 23 to slice on this DR but that didn't +0... but apparently optimal was 23 with the same 2q reduction but with a different 4 mover setup...

(U' R') U' R
B (F D2 F2 D2 L2 F) //0c3 8e (11) 4 variations
B2 U (L2 F2 U' B2 U2 B2 R2 D')
(L2 F2 U2 R2 F2) //fin

I only had this, and two 4c4s in 11...
bad scramble

L' U' F' R B'
R' (B2 R' U2 B2 R) //2c4 (11) 4 variations
(D R2 U R2 U' L2 F2 U)
(L2 D2 F2 B2) //slice (23) +1=24

I got lucky being able to see that it was +1 to JZP, but 2c4 with variations is a nightmare lol
there also were quite the number of +6 HTRs

I had the RZP for the 22, but I didn't switch it for whatever reason

R' B
U D2 R D2 B2 D' L2 U' L //2c4 (11)
R2 U R2 U' F2 R2 U' F2 U'
R2 L2 F2 //slice (23) +0=23

couldn't really find anything better than this (which was the first HTR I checked in this attempt) optimal from this DR tho lol

U' (F D' R D)
(L2 U2 L' $ F' L B) //4b2 2e (11) (I found a 25 off of this)
($=R2) //4b2 2e (12) inverting the L gives 0e
R2 F2 U2 L [B2 R'] //looks bad but H perm gives good floppy
[U2 D2 F2 L'] B2 R2 B2 U2 //slice (24) +0=24

EO extension, DR extension, and HTR extension in one solution lol
This was a tough scramble, that was saved by me kinda knowing how to do 7c8e

original DR was 23 optimal that I missed tho (and I checked the HTR...)

Edit: I genuinely missed that EO extension that gave the 20...

(F2 B U B R)
B2 R2 L2 D B' U //2c4 (11)
(B R2 B R2 U2 D2 F' U2 F')
L2 D2 B2 R2 L2 //slice (25) +0=25

yeah... I don't even want to know what I would've gotten on this if I didn't start practicing 7c8e like 2ish weeks ago... and optimal for this was 24 (and the route looks cooked)

it's just that almost nothing was RZP after checking 55(if i counted right) EOs

sad
L' D2 B2 R (L)          // eolr               (5/5)
                        // rzpfb-eolr         (0/5)
F' L2 F2 U B D          // drfb-eolr [4b2 2e] (6/11)
U2 F' D2 B              // htr-drfb           (4/15)
R2 F2 D2 L R B2 D2 L R  // fin                (9-2/22)