(U' D' R F' B) //EO 5/21
(D) (L' F2 R' U) //DR 4b2 4e 10/21
R' U2 F2 R //HTR 14/21
B2 L2 B2 D2 //S-slice 18/21
D2 B F' R2 F B' //6-3 = 21/21

Nice! Especially on a scramble that had only 2 4 move EOs, I usually struggle with those but got lucky this time.

Also had this DR:
(U' D2 F' R' L') (D) L2 U F2 B2 D //4b2 2e in 11 last U can also be U'. The U' variations is 23 optimal and U variation is 25.

Nice mo3 as well 22, 21, 21 = 21.33

(B U) //EO 2/21
(R' F') //rzp 3c2e 4/21
D2 L B L B' //DR 2c3 6e 9/21
R' (U2 R2^ B2 R'^ U2 R'^) //HTR 16/21
U' D' L2 U' D //slice 21/21
^=w //+0

I have been getting a lot of good solves recently. Maybe I am actually improving!!

Only had time to check 2 mover and th3 movers on this scramble since completely checking a 2 mover takes a looong time for me.
And I found this DR in 9 pretty quickly so fidured that I will at least have some solution I can most probably find on that so no need to push till 35-40minutes just searching for DRs and risk DNFing.

D R F //EO+rzp 7c8e 3/22
U2 [L D2 U' L D] //DR 2c4 9/22 but hopeless on both sides. All short reductions go to 2c3 6e or 8e.
[]=L' R2 U2 D' L U //extended DR 2c4 10/22
(L'^ U2 B2 R'^ D2 R^ D2 R^) //HTR 18/22
(U2 R2 F2 B2) //slice 22/22
^=w //+0

Good solve. Managed to discard the hopeless 9 move DR early enough so I still had time to find the finish for the extension

U2 D2 B D' //EO + rzp 3c2e 5/21
(B2 L2 B L B) //DR 4a1 4e 9/21 wow
B2 D2 [F2 R2 U2 R //HTR 15/21
D2] F B' R2 F' B //slice 21-2 = 19/21
First I only found this:
[]= F2 R L F2 L U2 R2 L2 //+3 for 22 final

But much later I noticed that there is actually a blockyfish rewrite there!
[]= R2 U2 R2 ^ F2 ^^ R' D2 //new slice 20/21
^= M'
^^=M //+1 solved 21/21

U L F' R //EO 4/25
F' , D L2 U' B' L2 D2 B //DR 2c3 4e 12/25
R2 U' F2 U' L2 * U //HTR 18/25
^ L2 F2 ^^ D2 F2 //2e+slice 22/25
*= L2 U2 L2 U2 L2 U2 //slice 6-4 = 24/25
^= E
^^= E' //+1 25/25
Tough scramble. Only (set of) DR(s) I had. Optimal from all variations. 
Mallard gives 22 if you randomly decide to NISS a 4 move EO or 23 from 2c5 in 9. 

EDIT: Oh, nevermind I had R U2 L trigger turned of. Mallard gives 20 from 4c6e rzp but I still suck at those unless they are jzp or like 1 move away from jzp

(F' L2 U' L) //EO 4/23
(F) (U D2 L2 D R2 F') //DR 2c3 2e 11/23
(R2 D' L2 D'^ F2 L2 U^) //HTR 18/23
(L2 D2^ F2 R2 F2) //slice 23/23
^=w //+0

DR is 22 optimal but needs either reduction to 4a1 4e and then switch or 5qt. Reduction+switch is findable but not easy unless you use bounding.

B' D R' //EO+rzp 4c4e
(F B R2 F B2 U) //DR 2c4 9/23
F (F2 U2 B' L2 B L2 [B) //HTR 17/23
(D2 R2 D2 F2] R2) //slice 22/23
[]= F L2 D2 L2 F B //+1 23/23
Optimal from this DR but the obvious variation (F' B' L2 F B2 L) has a findable 22...

B' L //EO
(F U) F' R2 L2 F U //DR 4c3 in 9 but it is really bad...

B (L' R' B') //EO 4/24
(D') //rzp 4c6e 5/24
(U2 R' B2 R2 D' L2 U') //DR 4a2 4e 12/24
(B2 L' ^ D2 B2 R2 ^ B2 L') //HTR 19/24
(F B R2 D2 F' B) //2 moves cancel with inverse so slice in 23/24
^=M2 //+1 24/24

Also had this DR:
(B' L U' D' R) (F) (R2 F2 D B2 U' B) //4a1 2e in 12. Also 24 optimal but with 5qt optimals :D

Mallard gives 22 from (R) R U' L EO that I somehow completely missed even though I usually check for 1 move to 8 bad...

Got too caught up on (D F2 L) and loads of short DRs but all are like 2c5.
Finally had (D F2 L) U F R2 B U2 F2 B' D //2c3 4e in 11 but already wasted too much time...

(R D F' L) //EO+rzp 4c4e 4/25
(B2 R2 U2 L2 B2 U' F) //DR 4c3 11/25 
Apparently I'm blind this week. There was a basic 10 move DR from that rzp but I didnt see it somehow...
(U^ R2 U' R2 U2 L2 B2 D^) //HTR 19/25
(L2 F2 R2 F2 D2 F2) //slice 25/25
^=w +0 // optimal from DR 

And of course the DR I missed is 22 optimal :/ And optimal is easy to find.
23.66 mo3 this week with insanely stupid misses on 2 and 3. Should have been 22.00 without anything magical...

(D R U' D2 L) //EO 5/25
(B') F2 R2 D' U' B R2 B //DR 4b2 4e 13/25 :D
D2^ R2 D^ R2 F2 D'^ //HTR 19/25
B2 R2 D2 F2 R2 D2^ //slice 25/25
 ^=w //+0 25/25

What a scramble. No 4 movers, only a very limited amount of 5 movers. Only sub12 DR I found was the non-extension one of the DR I ended up using:
(D R U' D2 L) //EO 5/25
(B) D U' B' D2 B // But obviously this is 4c4.
Also tried to solve that but it is hopeless beyond any reason.

R B U D //EO 4/25
F' , U2 L R U2 R' B //DR 2c3 6e 11/25
(F2 L^ U2 D2 B2 L' U2 L'^) //HTR 19/25
(F2 D2 L2 * F2) //2e2e+slice 23/25
*= L2 D2 U2 R2 U2 D2 //slice 25/25
^=w //+0 25/25

Tough scramble. Only DR I had to work with. Other sub12 DRs were all 5q.

(F' U L D) //EO 4/23
(R') (U2 F2 R2 F' L') //DR 4c3 10/23
R2 F R2 F2 U2 [F R2 F] //HTR 18/23
R2 U2 R2 D2 //slice 22/23
[]= F2 B' D2 B //+1 23/23

Apparently there was a 22 with 5qt.

L' B' //EO 2/22
D' (R L D' F2 L2 U) //DR 4b2 4e 9/22
(L2 D2 F2 B2 L^ F2 U2 R'^) //HTR 17/22
(D2 L2^ D2 B2 L2) //slice 22/22
^=w //+0 22/22

Variation of this DR is 21 optimal but missed that even though it is perfectly findable... 
Oh and there also seems to be a 20 with double slice stuff. Why am i so bad :D

F' (L2 R' F') //EO 4/24
(L) (U R2 D L2 U2 D R) //DR 4b2 2e 12/24
R2 L2 U'^ B2 U'^ //HTR 17/24
R2 U2^ L2 F2 U2 F2 U2 //slice 24/24
^=w //+0

-

(U' B' R F) //EO+rzp 4c4e 4/20
F2 R2 F2 U' L //DR 2c3 4e 9/20
D' B2 R2 D ^ B2 U //HTR 15/20
R2 L2 D2 ^ L2 //slice 19/20
^=E2 //+1 20/20

NICE!

B2 L U2 B //EO 4/24
D' //rzp 4c4e
U' //oh look, another rzp 4c2e :D 6/24
B2 L' U' R2 U' //DR 2c3 4e 11/24
R F2 R2 B2 R U2 R //HTR 18/24
B2 D2 L2 D2 R2 D2 //solved 24/24

Also had this B2 L U2 B' , D' , R2 L' U' R2 U //4a2 4e in 10.
That is 23 optimal but needs 9 move HTR so I missed that. Not too mad about that since 9 move HTR is a lot.

D' (D2 B2 D) //EO 4/22
(R B') (F2 L U2 F) //DR 2c4 10/22
F2 R (U2 R' F2 D2 R^ D2 R^) //HTR 19/22
(B2 L2^ D2) //slice 22/22 
^=w //+0

Nice solve on not that good of a scramble. No linear 4 move EOs and only 4 (I think) NISS 4 movers... 
Optimal  from DR was also not that trivial since it needed 9 move NISS HTR. 
I feel like I have generally improved my DR->solved step quite significantly lately :)

L2 U D2 L //EO+rzp 4c4e 4/22
F2 R2 L2 D R2 D' F' //DR 4b2 2e 11/22
B2 U' ^ R2 D' //HTR 15/22
R2 F2 B2 ^^ R2 B2 //slice 20/22
^= E
^^=E' //+2

Probably missed something great since sprint scramble and didnt have time to check everything. Found few 9 move DRs but those were 4c4 and 2c5 and I couldnt figure out a 1 move extension to make them better either.
Still a good result but scramble seemed so amazing that I wanted even better.

(R2 B2 U2 R) //EO 4/23
(F' U') //rzp 3c2e 6/23
(B U2 B' D F D) //DR 4a1 4e 12/23
(F L2 D2 L2 B' R2 ^ B') //HTR 19/23
(R2) //2e2e 20/23
^= R2 F2 L2 F2 R2 B2 //solved 6-3 = 23/23

Had so many 4b5 DRs in 10-11 moves this solve :D

(F' U D' R') //EO+jzp 4/21
(F R2 B' U2 F) //DR 2c4 9/21
(U'^ F2 R2 U F2 R2 U F2 U^) //HTR 18/21
(F2 D2 R2) //slice 21/21
^=w //+0

Decided to go all in on this set of DRs since 4 variations and even +14 is a decent result.
Unfortunately normal side seemed horrible for DR so I had to brute force it so I just spammed most =< 9 linear DRs from all variations. (B[w] U2 B[w]' L2 B[w]) you can widen any 2 of the B moves to get HTR equivivalent DRs.

(L' U' R' F') //EO 4/25
(R') (U' B2 U L2 U L') //DR 4b2 2e 11/25
R2 U' (F2 B2 U2 R2 U) //18/25
(L2 ^ F2 B2 L2 B2 ^^) //slice 23/25
^=E
^^=E' //+2

U' B (L' F') //EO 4/24
(L') (B2 D L2 D L) //DR 2c4 10/24
D'^ (D L2 B2 D B2 D'^) //HTR 17/24
([B2 R2 F2 L2]) //double slice 21/24
[]= F2 L2 F B U2 F' B //slice +3 24/24
^=w //+0

R' B R' U //EO 4/23
B //rzp 3c2e 5/23
(L2 F2 R2 F R F) //DR 4b2 4e 11/23
D2 L (B2 U2 R2^ U2 L) //HTR 18/23
(B2 D2 F2 R2^ F2) //slice 23/23
^=w //+0

Optimal from DR

(F' L' F2 R) //EO 4/21
(U' B) //rzp 4c2e 6/21
(D' B R2 B') //DR 4b2 2e 10/21
(R2 U R2 U) //HTR 14/21
(L2 * F2 B2 U2) //3e+slice 18/21
*= L2 U2 L2 F2 L2 U2 L2 F2 //slice 8-5 = 21/21
After DR: (R2 [U R2 U'] L2 F2 L2 U2 L2 B2 U2)
[]= D B2 D' //solved +0

Optimal from EO!

(U) L2 D2 F D //EO+rzp 4c6e 5/22
B U2 B2 F' R F2 L //DR 4b2 2e 12/22 with lots of variations.
(B2 ^ D2 ^ B' U2 F) //HTR 17/22
(R2 D2 R2 D2) //slice 21/22
^= S2 //+1 22/22

Seemed like a bad scramble. Didn't have ANYTHING at 30 mins, not a single decent DR but then found this around 35-40 and it had some variations so one of them was likely to be good.

B F D R //EO 4/26
B' //rzp 4c4e 5/26
R2 D U R2 U F //DR 4c3 11/26
U^ (U^ L2 D R2 D^ F2 D^) //HTR 19/26
(R2 B2 D2^ L2 F2 L2 F2) //slice 26/26 
^=w //+0

Just horrible. Only DR I found (+ the variation that is also 4c3 8e).
DR is 24 optimal but those are 10 move DRs with 5qt so pretty hard to find.

(L' R' F D) //EO+rzp 4c4e 4/23
(R' U2 R D2 L' B) //DR 2c3 2e 10/23
(F2 D2 L D2 L' D2 * R') //HTR 17/23
(F2 U2 F2 U2) //2e+slice 21/23
*= D2 R2 D2 R2 D2 R2 //slice 6-3 24/23
After DR: (F2 D2 L D2 [L' R2 D2 R2 D2 R] F2 U2 F2 U2)
[]= R B2 L2 F2 L //solved -1 23/23

DR is 22 optimal but found it too late to check all NISS HTRs so missed that.

(B') F D L B //EO 5/24
R //rzp 4c6e 6/24
D' R U2 L //DR 2c4 10/24
(F2 U'^) U'^ L2 F2 U' L2 U //HTR 18/24
B2 D2 B2 R2 B2 F2 //slice 24/24
^=w //+0
Optimal from both DR variations (this + widening the R and L). Bad scramble but at least got something...

(R' D' F) //EO 3/19
L //rzp 4c4e 4/19
(U L2 U B2 L) //DR 4b2 2e 9/19
U' F2 D //HTR 12/19 wow!
L2 * F2 R2 F2 R2 //2e+slice 17/19
*= L2 D2 R2 D2 L2 U2 //solved 6-3 = 20/19

Now after DR we have: U' F2 D' [R2 D2 L2 U2 F2 R2 F2 R2]
[]= L2 U2 L2 D2 B2 R2 B2 L2 //-1 by cancelling with the inverse! 19/19

Nice! First sub 20 in a long while

R2 B2 U' L //EO 4/23
B //rzp 3c2e 5/23
(D2 F2 D' B' U B') //DR 4b2 4e 11/23
(R2 L2 U' B2 L2 D' ^) //HTR 17/23
(B2 L2 U2 ^ L2 U2) //slice 22/23
^=E2 //+1 23/23

(F D2 B L) //EO + rzp 4c4e 4/23
D' B2 U D B2 D' B' //DR 4b2 2e 11/23
(B2 U2^ F2 U B2 D') //HTR 17/23
(U2^ B2 L2 D2 L2) //double slice 22/23 but you can immediately see that DR slice is -1
^=w //S-slice 21/23

Now we have:
 D' B2 U D B2 D' [B' L2 D2 L2 B2] D' F2 U' B2 D2 B2 L' B' D2 F'
[]= F' D2 R2 B F' R2 F2 //+2 23/23

D' L R' B //EO 4/22
R //jzp 4c6e 5/22
F2 D2 R2 D F2 U //DR 4b2 2e 11/22
D2 [L' B2 L //HTR 15/22
B2 L2 U2] D2 F2 //slice 20/22
[]= R' U2 L U2 L2 U2 R L' //+2 22/22

Also had several 2c4 in 9 DRs from same EO on different axis but couldnt find anything better from those. Apparently there were some 20-21 optimals from those but those optimals didn't seem that findable to me. But probably Jay or some other guy has still found those :D

U' F2 U //EO 3/24
F2 R //rzp 4c4e 5/24
F D2 B L2 F' L //DR 2c3 2e 11/24
[B' (F2 R2 F U2 B') //HTR 17/24
(L2 U2 L2 D2 L2)] //slice 22/24 
[]= (B2 L2 F D2 F' U2 R2 F' B L2 D2 L2 B) //+2 24/24

Also had another 22 to slice from normal side of this DR but also +2. Super unlucky...