(F U' R') //EO+rzp 4c4e 3/3
D2 B' R2 L2 F U //2c3 6e 6/9
(U2 B' U2 D2 R2 B L2 B ^) //HTR 8/17
(D2 F2 ^ R2 L2) //slice 4/21
^=E2 //+1/22

Also had funny DR:
(F U' R) //EO+rzp 4c4e
D //additional rzp to 0c4e
(D' F D2 U2 B' D) //2c3 2e in 10
That is 21 optimal but the path required 2HTs before reducing to 4b2 4e so quite hard I would say...

(R2 D' B) //EO 3/3
(L) (D B2 R) //2c4 4/7
(U' B2 L2 D' F2 L2 D' R2 D) //HTR 9/16
(F2 L2 D2) //slice 3/19
widen all QTs //solved +0/19

Wow, a 7 move DR from first EO I checked :D
Finding the finish took a while since it needs 9 move HTR but luckily I had plenty of time.

(F L2 B') //EO 3/3
D (L2 D2 B2 R' D2 R' D) //2c3 4e 8/11
F2 B2 R' D2 R B2 L' //HTR 7/18
D2 L2 //floppy 2/20
D2 B2 U2 D2 //solved 4-1/23

(D' F2 L') //EO 3/3
(F D') (B2 F' U' B U') //2c4 7/10 (D') can be in either direction.
L2 B' (B' U2 L2 * F L2 B') //HTR 8/18
(R2) //2e2e 1/19
*= L2 U2 L2 D2 R2 D2 //6-4/21

Very similar insertion compared to my last solve :D
Probably easier to see this by doing:
(B') L2 B' R2 B L2 F' //HTR and then direct finish. But whatever works, works.

Also had:
(D' F2 L) (F) L2 U' B2 L2 U F //2c4 in 10

R' (U D' L) //EO 4/4
U' B , D U2 F2 R2 B' //2c3 2e 7/11
F2 U B2 * [U' B2 U'] //HTR and also 2e2e+slice 6/17
*= B2 L2 B2 R2 F2 R2 //6-2/21
[]= Uw U2 B2 Uw' //+1/22

Ties Mallard with reasonable settings, so nicely done!

(L2 D2 B L) //EO+rzp 4/4
R2 U2 B2 L2 U' B //2c4 6/10
U' L2 U' R2 U ^ R2 U' //HTR 7/17
F2 B2 R2 F2 U2 ^//slice 5/22
^=E2 //+1/23

(L D2 L) //EO 3/3
(F) (R2 U' L2 B' U' F) //4b2 4e 7/10
R2 U' (L2 [D2 F2 D]) //HTR 6/16
(L2 B2 L2 R2) //slice 4/20
[]= Dw' D' F2 Dw //+1/21

DR opt, but there is a 19 from that rzp if you switch. I switched but couldnt see the +6 to DR. Need to practice more 7c8e...

D R2 B' //EO 3/3
(D) (F2 L2 D2 R F2 D) //4b2 2e 7/10
(F2 L B2 L'^) //HTR 4/14
[F2 U2] D2^^ //double slice M+S 3/17
[]= F' B' R2 F' B //slice +3/20
^= M'
^^= M //+2/22

Nice, sub22 mo3 this week!

(R') L' U [R //EO 4/22
F B] (L2 D B D B) //DR 2c3 2e 7/11 R F B on normal so variation/double slice potential
(L2 U R2 B2 U^ B2 D^) //HTR 7/18
Now we switch to normal to look at DR variations and find:
[] = R' F B //different variation +0
D2^^ L2 D2 L2 D2 //slice 5-1/22
^=E'
^^=E2 //+0/22

(F) D2 L' F //EO 4/4
(D2 R') (U R2 U F2 D' R) //4b2 4e 8/12
D (B2 [D' B2 D'] L2 D') //HTR 7/19
(R2 B2 R2 L2 F2) //slice 5/24
[]= Dw D2 B2 Dw' //+1/25

Just bad. Missed everything...

(F2 U) //EO 2/2
L F' , D2 F2 L2 R B //2c4 7/9
(R' U2 L' D2 L F2 D2 [L') //HTR 8/17
(U2 B2 R2] U2) //slice 4/21
[]= L R2 D2 F2 L2 //+1/22

DR opt.

I had this DR:
(F2 U L F') U2 R2 U2 D2 L B //4b2 in 10 
That is 21 optimal but the path is hard 4qt.

There is also a 20 from that rzp but I didnt see the variation B2 D2 L B2 U2 F. Setups to R2 F2 R are hard, especially since there was a more "normal" DR from that rzp already...

(R' U2 B D' L') //EO+rzp 5/5
(R2 F' R2 U) //2c3 4e 4/9
F U2 R2 * F' U2 B //HTR 6/15
U2 R2 U2 R2 //2e+slice 4/19
*= R2 U2 F2 U2 R2 F2 U2 F2 //slice 8-6/21
Post-DR: F' U2 R2 [F2 U2 F] U2 B U2 R2 U2 R2 
[]= B2 D2 B2 F' //+1/22

Only good DR I had. DR is 21 opt with:
solve -o -t 64 R' U' F R B' L F2 R2 B2 U' F2 U2 R2 D R F' U B2 D F' L2 F' R' U' F (R' U2 B D' L' R2 F' R2)
L2 F' U2 B' D2 F U2 R2 U' D' B2 L2 D

But I dont think I would ever see that finish since post-HTR part involves breaking the already made square and then leaving double slice.

But what I should have seen is trying the extension. That gives an easy 21.

D2 B' F U //EO+rzp 4c2e 4/4
F R2 B2 R' F' //2c4 5/9
(F2 R^) R^ F2 R'^ U2 R^ //HTR 7/16
U2 F2 B2 R2 B2 //slice 5/21
^=w //+0/21

R' F //EO 2/2
D L //what I somehow thought was rzp 4c4e with 3 NISS pairs 2/4
(L D' R B2 R') //Wait, this isnt 4c4e. But wait again, it is still 2c3 4e in 9! 5/9
(U L2 U^ F2 D'^) //HTR 5/14
(B2 F2 L2 F2 D2^ L2) //slice 6-1/19
^=w //+0/19

One of the weirdest and funniest solves I have had. Accidentally switch 3c4e rzp and it gives 5 moves to 2c3 4e :D

(D' B) //EO 2/2
D , U2 R' D2 R2 F2 R U //4b2 4e 8/10
(R2 D2 L F2 U2 R) //HTR 6/16
(B2 * U2 F2) //2e+slice 3/19
*= B2 R2 F2 R2 B2 L2 //solved 6-3/22

DR opt.

Mainly looked at these 2 DRs in addition to this one:
(D' B') D (F2 L2 D2 L D2 R' D) //4a2 4e in 10. 23opt.
L2 F' U L , D, L2 F2 D2 B' D //4b2 4e in 10. 22opt.

(B' F' L2 D) //EO+rzp 4/4
D2 B2 R' B' //2c3 4e 4/8
D2 [R F2 R' U2 R' //HTR 6/14
B2 R2] B2 D2 B2 D2 //slice 6-1/19
[]= Rw' R2 F2 R' U2 Rw' B2 Rw2 //+1/20

This and variations were the only DRs I looked at. Optimal from all of those.

R' F' U L' D //EO+rzp 5/5
(F' D2 B2 R2 F' R) //2c3 4e 6/11
L2 B L2 D2 B^ U2 B^ //HTR 7/18
L2 B2 D2 B2 //2e2e+slice 4/22
B2 D2 L2 D2 B2^ R2 U2 R2 //slice 8-5 = 3/25
^=w //+0 
optimal from DR.

Only sub12 DR I had but unfortunately it was cursed...

(D) F' R' D' //EO+rzp 4/4
(L' U2 D2 L' U2 L) //4c3 6/10
(B U2 [B U2 B2 L2 F') //HTR 7/17
(U2 F2] U2 L2 U2) //slice 5/22
[]=Bw U2 B2 L2 F' U2 Fw F //+1/23

(F2 U2 B') //EO+rzp 3/3
(R2 F2 R' U2 L' U) //2c3 4e 6/9
(R2 U R^ F2 R^ D2 R) //HTR 7/16
(D U' R2 D' U' L2^) //slice 6/22
^=w //+0

So many sub10 DRs that I didnt know what to do :D

(R' D) B' U //EO 4/4
(R) (U2 F B2 L2 U2 * R') //DR 2c4 7/11
F' L2 B D2 L2 B L2 B //HTR 8/19
R2 L2 F2 //2e+slice 3/23
*U2 L2 D2 R2 D2 L2 //slice +2/25
Now all on normal we have:
B' U F' L2 B D2 L2 B L2 [B R2 L2 F2 R L2 D2 R2 D2 B2] F' U2 R' D' R
This [] seems super sus. And surely enough:
[] = B' L' F2 L2 B2 R L' B2 //slice -3/22
So now we have:
B' U {F' L2 B D2 L2 B L2 B'} L' F2 L2 B2 R L' B2 F' U2 R' D' R
{} = F2 Fw L2 Bw D2 L2 Bw L2 Bw' //+1/23

Not a great result but cool solve :D
Once again scramble is horrible. Cubelib with my settings gives one 22 from 2+3 NISS EO.
Rough set this week. Happy that I still got a 23.00 mean with those scrambles...

U (B2 F D') //EO 4/4
(B2 R') R2 L2 B' R' F R //DR 4a1 2e 8/12
(B^) F2^^ L2 F' U2 D2 B //HTR 7/19
D2 B2^ R2 L2 //slice 4/23
^=w
^^=S //+1/24

Optimal from DR.
Also had:
U (B2 F D) (F2 L) F2 R' F' R //4c4 in 10. 23opt
U B' L2 F D (R2 L' F U2 R2 F) //2c4 in 11 with variation. Seems to be 24opt.
Also had several 11 move DRs that were 4c4 or 2c5.

Scramble seems horrible. My cubelib only finds 24 with rzp=5,DR=11.

(R) B' U' L //EO 4/4
(F' D) //rzp 3c2e 2/6 
(F' D2 F2 U' B' U) //DR 4a2 4e 6/12 (D move on the rzp line can be inverted for another 4a2 4e)
B2^ U2 B R2 B2^ U2 B //HTR 7/19
L2 U2 L2 U2 //slice 4-1/22
^=w //+0

Only sub12 DR with reasonable subset I had was this:
U L B F' D' //EO+rzp 4c4e. Premade rzp with 2 NISS pairs so switch.
(R) //Additional 4c2e rzp with 2 NISS pairs AND a side pair. So switch again.
L2 F2 L' B2 L //4b2 4e in 11
That is 23opt. I had 24 as a backup from that, but got lucky with the 4a2 4e in 12.

22 also seems to be best that Mallard gives (rzp=5, dr=11)

U2 B' D2 L' //EO+rzp 4/4
(F' R2 B2 D2 F D') //DR 4c3 6/10
D2 B' U2 B (R2 D2 L2 [B') //HTR 8/18
(D2 B2] D2 R2) //slice 4/22
[]= F2 B U2 F2 //+1/23

Had several 2c4 in 11 but no other good DRs beside this. I missed the R U2 L (R) EO that seems to give all the good solutions...

(F' D' L F) //EO+rzp 4c4e 4/4
L' R' B2 R U //DR 4b2 4e 5/9 with one HTR equivalent variation.
(B2 R' U2 L U2 L B2 L') //HTR 8/17
(U2 F2 D2 B2 R2) //solved 5/22

DR is 21 opt but didnt see (' U2 L2 U2) to trigger.
FMC is hard... +2opt,+2opt,+1opt from DRs this week...

(U L2 R2 F') //EO 4/4
(U') (L' F2 D2 L2 R' D) //DR 4a1 8e 7/11
R^ (L2 F2 R' U2 D2 L^^) //HTR 7/18
(F2 D2 B2 D2) //slice 4/22
^=w
^^=L Lw' // +1/23

Optimal from DR.
Also had:
(D2 R B2 D) (L' U2 D2 B2 L2 R F) //4b2 2e in 11. 22opt
R L D2 B , L (U' L2 D' R2 D' R) //2c3 4e in 11. 25opt

The way I missed the simple 21 from (D2 B' R D) EO was annoying.
It was last EO on my list and I messed up the cube right before it and thought "1 EO cant be that important so I wont scramble it again just to check that." Turns out it was kind of important.

U' R' U' F //EO 4/4
D , F2 L U2 L2 R D //DR 4b2 2e 7/11
L2 F2 L' D2 L' //HTR 5/16
F2 L2 D2 * F2 R2 //3e 5/21
*=D2 L2 U2 B2 U2 L2 D2 F2 //8-6/23

Found really early on but couldnt improve. 
Apparently I missed all the finishes this attempt...
There is a 21 from variation of this DR from an obvious 4 move HTR but couldnt see the finish.
Also had:
U R' U' F' , R' , L2 D' R D2 R //4b2 4e in 10. 22opt. 2 moves to 6 move 4b2 4e trigger.

F' R2 F' R' //EO
F' (D2 B2 L2 D' B) //DR 4b2 4e 10/20
D' B2 D^ B2 D^ B2 D //HTR 17/20
L2 D2 L2 //slice 20/20
^=w //+0

Optimal from all my DRs. Also tied Mallard (rzp=5,DR=11).

Other DRs I looked at:
F' D B R' B (D2 B2 L2 D' B) //2c3 6e in 10. 23opt. Funnily same DR line but different EO but still different subset...
D F2 B R (U D B2 D B' D) //2c4 in 10. 23opt. First time I remember finding decent DR with 7c8e->3c2e->DR

Had a 11 to 2c3 2e that was 22 optimal but ran out of time.

(R' L' F U' B') //EO+rzp 7c8e
D2 R' B2 R D' L U' //DR 4a1 4e 12/23
([R2 F2 U2 F2 R) //HTR 17/23
(D2 R2 D2 R2]) //slice 21/23
[]=Rw2 F2 U2 F2 R D2 Rw R D2 Rw R //+2 23/23

DR is 22 optimal...

What a scramble. 29 sub6 EOs and Mallard doesnt even find a solution with rzp=5 DR=11 :D

F2 R2 F R' //EO+rzp 4c4e
(R2 U R2 B2 U D2 B) //DR 4b2 2e 11/21
B2 U'^ F2 U2 B2 U^ //HTR 17/21
B2 L2 B2 R2 //slice 21/21
^= +0

Nice! Obviously optimal from DR. Mallard only gives 1 20 move solution but that is 5 move EO on 2 bad axis so...hard.

Only other decent DR I had was:
F' R2 F' R' , F' , R2 U B2 U D2 B //4b2 4e in 11. 23opt from both variations.

So 2 good solves this week (2&3) and one majorly f*ked up one where I missed an easy 21.