L U2 B //EO+rzp 3/3
(R2 U' B2 D' U2 L2 U L') //4b2 2e 8/11 with 4 variations
R2 U2 L2 U^ B2 D^ //shortest HTR on the other side so "whack the variations" was easy... 6/17
(U2^ F2 L2 B2 L2 D2) //slice 6-1/22
^= +0/22

Also had:
L' U2 B (U L D B2 L U2 D2 R) //2c3 4e in 11
and the flipped variation:
L' U2 B F2 U F2 U R2 D (U L D) //0c0 4e in 12

R (R2 D2 R') //EO 4/4
(U') B L2 D'F U' //2c3 4e 6/10
L2 F (B' U2 R2 F') //HTR 6/16
(D2 L2 U2 L2 B2) //double slice 5/21 but really 20 since F (B2) 

Now solving this "normally" by doing wrong slice first was hopeless +3 and +2. 
But since this was the only DR I had I tried the other way around.
After DR we have:
(B' U2 R2 [F' D2 L2 U2 L2 B2 F'] L2)
[]= F {B2 U2 R2 D2} R2 F //wrong slice +0/21
{}= U2 D2 F2 U2 L2 U2 R2 //+2/23

I think this was the first time I found this kind of slice solution!

I had:
U R F L U'
B2 R2 F U2 F2 R //4b2 4e and variation in 11 but those absolutely suck...

Also had:
(D L2 U' F2 U' D B) //DR-2s in 7 but it is 4b5 so no hope there.

(U' F' D R L') //EO+rzp 5/5
D' F2 D2 R2 L2 U' F' //4a1 6e 7/12
I really wanted to get U R L type DR to try HTR-1s / HTR-2s stuff :D
Of course I also checked the 2 mover but DR in 11, from R' B (L) rzp, was the best I could do. 
And I argue that U R L DR in 12 is better than "normal" DR in 11.
Especially since my DR in 11 was 2c4. But here that 2c4 happened to have a 10 move finish :DDD

"Unfortunately" here optimal was not of the HTR-2s form but rather "normal" HTR-1s form:
D R2 L2 U L2 U' //HTR 6/18
B2 D2 //"FR" for the slice we try to solve here 2/20
L2 B2 R2 ^ F2 ^^//M slice 24/24 but we will most likely cancel moves slicing since we have R L'
^=M' //+1/25
^=M  //-3/22 R L' from inverse cancels and the D cancels because last F2 becomes D2

Not super cool because no HTR-2s but still quite cool!

U' (F D' R D) //EO+rzp 7c8e 5/5
(R2 D2 L F' L B) //4b2 2e with tons of variations 6/11
L2 F2 U2 L^ D2 R^ //HTR 6/17
F2 U2 [F2 B2 L2 D2 L2] //slice 7/24
but [] = L2^ D2 L2^ F2 B2 //slice -1/23
^=w //+0/23

So many variations and lot of them are not even HTR equivalent...
There are 23s from several of them and even a 22 from at least one of them but 4qt.

D2 F B R' //EO 4/4
U' B' (D' B' U' B') //4c4 6/10
(U B2 U) //I switched all 3 move reductions to 4b2. 3/13
L2 F2 U R2 F2 U //HTR 6/19 This was already in trigger but HTRs in 17 were not as good.
F2 D2 R2 //slice 3/22
+0 with blockyfish

I only had this and the 2c4 in 11 linearly from same rzp.
+12 finish from 4c4 :D

(L2 D B' R) //EO+rzp 8c8e 4/4
(F B U D F' U2 B) //DR bt bad subset 7/11
L2 U^ R2 U'^ R2 L2 D //HTR 7/18
F2 B2 R2 F2 D2 // slice 5/23
^=w //+0

Found this in the last 5 minutes since I spent most of my time on these:
(F U' B') (D) L' R' D' R D //2c3 4e in 9
and
D L2 B2 L' B2 U' F D B //2c4 in 9
but those are ultimate bait :D
2c3 is 22 opt but all opt and opt+1 need 9 or 10 move HTR :D
2c4 is also 22 opt but with 6qt. And all opt+1 again needs 9 move HTR as well...

Luckily the finish from 4a1 6e was linear and easy to find quickly.

L R' B' U2 R //EO+rzp 5/5
(D U' F2 L2 U' B) //4b2 4e with few variations 6/11
(U^) L2 D2 F2 R2 F2 U'^ //HTR 7/18
B' F' L2 F B' //slice 5/23
^=w //+0

Only decent set of DRs I had. 
This was the kind of scramble where my lack of 5 move EO knowledge usually causes issues. 
But this time luckily one of the EOs I did find was the "correct" one.
Also there are no sliceEO skips and only one 1 move sliceEO so nothing there either...
Only thing better than this that cubelib gives is 22 from 2+3 NISS EO so I'm not finding that without getting extremely lucky.

D2 B R2 F //EO 4/4
L (F2 U' L') //4a2 4e 4/8
B2 U (B2 L2 B2 R2 U) //HTR 7/15
(B2 D2 ^ R2 F2 B2 ^) //slice 5/20 
^= E2 //+1/21

DR opt and also best cubelib gives with standard rzp=5 and DR=11.

D L' F2 L //EO+rzp 4/4
F2 L2 F2 U' R2 D2 F' //4b2 2e 7/11 tons of variations!
L2 B2 U' F2 D //HTR 5/16
F2 B2 R2 U2 F2 //solved 5/21

(F' D R B) //EO 4/4
(D) L2 U2 R D' //4b2 2e 5/9
F2 L2 D2 L' D2 R //HTR 6/15
D2 R2 //FR 2/17
B2 F2 U2 F2 D2 //direct solve 5-1/21 

Boring solve but good result

had 2c3 4e in 10, 2c3 2e in 11 and 4c3 in 10 but nothing wanted to finish...

R' U F B //EO +rzp 4c4e 4/4
(F2 D' B2 R B2 L') //oh look the other axis is 6 to DR :D 2c4 6/10
Unfortunately it looks kind of doomed. Shortest linear HTRs are 9 moves and other side is stacked corners.
Now I left out the F B and did HTR-1s //-2/8 
(F2 D' B2 L2 {U R2 U' R2 U) //HTR-1s 9/17
(L2 D2} [B2 L2 F B']) //double slice 6/23
[]= F B U2 //slice -2/21
{}= Uw R2 Uw' R2 Uw2 U' L2 Dw2 //+1/22

Only "decent" DR I found anad just got lucky with it. Everything was bad subset.

Also had these DR-1s:
U' D B2 U D2 R' D2 R //2c4-1s in 8 and variations. But shortest edge fixes dont improve the subset so doomed.
(R D2 L' U2 L2 B' R2 B) //4b5-1s in 8 but horrible subset and shortest edge fixes dont improve the subset so also hopeless.

F (D' L' F) //EO 4/4
(R) (D B2 U2 D2 L') //4b2 2e 6/10
(R2 F2 B2 U'^ R2 U'^) //HTR 6/16
(R2 U2^ R2 U2 F2) //slice 5-1/20
^=w //+0/20
DR opt.
Also had:
(R2 D R' L) (D') (F' B' D2 B U) //2c3 2e in 10. 21opt.

And since there were not that many sub5 EOs and some slice EO skips I again also checked for DR-fe. There were 2 DR-2s in 6:
. //E slice EO on R/L (all flipped)
U' B' D' B2 U F //2c4-2s in 6
and
. //E slice EO on U/D (all flipped) + 7c8e rzp
B2 U' B R' B R //2c3-2s in 6

I only had time to look at the first one but the best I could find in time was:
U' B' D' B2 U F //DR-2s 6/6
U D' //DR-1s 2/8
(R2 # D) //2c3-1s 4e with edges setup for slicing 2/10
D2 [F R2 U2 B'] R2 F //HTR-1s 7-1/16
U2 R L //2e2e 3/19
#= R2 D2 L2 U2 L2 D2 //slice 6-3/22
[]=Fw' F2 R2 U2 Bw' //+1/23
There is a much easier to see 22 that I somehow missed...
After HTR-1s just do: F2 L2 F2 U2 R L U2 //solved in 22

THIS IS THE COOLEST SOLVE OF MY LIFE!

If you are active on FMC discord you have probably heard of the development of new DR-fe method.
So here it is in action!

First we notice that all E-slice edges are already oriented on both normal and inverse.

(.) //E slice edges oriented
(R') //DR-fe rzp 3c2e for U/D 1/1
(D2 L U L) //DR-2s meaning DR-some flipped edges that need 2 slice moves to fix. 4/5
(L' R') //DR-1s 2-2/5
F2 D' B2 [U R L] //DR 4b2 2e 6/11 with lots of variations 6/11 you can also do it without F2 but it gives 2c4.
(B2 U2 R2 {B' D2 B}) //shortest HTR on inverse so we can "whack the variations" 6/17
[]= U' F2 R' L' //+1/18 just go through the DR line and try to build blocks. LOTS of +1 variations availible
U2 B2 //leave S slice 2-1/19
{}= B2 F L2 F' //+1/20

I'm SO HAPPY with this! 5 to DR-1s is very rare and I knew the expected optimal is like 14-15 moves from that. So I spent all of my time on this since even getting opt+2 would mean like 22 that is a good result for me.

This is NOT optimal from DR-1s but I dont mind. I didnt realise that you can also try to solve the slice in the DR line. Here doing
F2 U' L2 D' F2 L' R' instead of my DR line gives +0 slice for 19 that is optimal for this DR-1s.

This was like the perfect scramble to do DR-fe since there were not that many sub5 EOs but one axis was only 2 flipped edges meaning we will have several slices/axis where slice EO is already done.

L (R2 U' L) //EO 4/4
(B) (R2 B2 D R2 D' F') //2c3 4e 7/11
(U^) R2 D F2 D^ //HTR 5/16
L2 D2 * L2 //2e+slice 3/19
*= D2 F2 D2 F2 D2^ F2 //slice 6-2/23
^=w //+0

Optimal from DR.
Also had:
(L') D' L //EO
F' D (F' R2 B D2 B' D) //4c3 in 11 that looks promising. Also 23 opt.

23 is the best cubelib gives without NISS 5 movers or rzp in 6. Buut there is this 19 with +3 rzp from 3 move EO that some people will probably find since people are so good nowadays:
D' L' (L')         // eolr               (3/3)
(F B D')           // rzpfb-eolr         (3/6)
(R2 D2 R2 F' D)    // drfb-eolr [4b2 4e] (5/11)
B R2 F B L2 D2 F'  // htr-drfb           (7/18)
L2                 // fin                (1/19)

(U F L2 B') //EO+rzp 4/4
U D2 R2 L2 U' L' //4c3 6/10
U^ (D B2 U2^ F2 R2 D^) //HTR 7/17
(R2 F2 R2 U2 B2) //slice 5/22
^=w //+1

D' R' B' U F' //EO + rzp 7c8e 5/5
U2 L' U R D //2c3 6e 5/10
(L^^) L2^^ B2 U2 L^ [F2 L] //HTR seems almost good so lets try +2 ext.
[]= U2 D2 B2 R^ //HTR 9/19
F2 B2 D2 //slice 3/22
^=w
^^=M2 //+1/23

Another tough scramble. So I am satisfied with 23.

U' (U2 B2 U') //EO 4/4
(L') D2 F' B D2 F L' //2c3 6e 7/11
F (R2 U2 L2 D2 B' L2 B'^) //HTR 8/19
(D2 R2 U2 D2) //slice 4/23
^=S2 //+1/24

There is 1 findable 23 from this set of DRs (others seem to be 5qt). 
And cubelib gives 1 other 23 from 2+3 NISS EO in addition to those.
Rough scramble soo 24 is a fine result for me on this.

EDIT: well, obviously I should have switched jzp in 8 :DDD How do people find this stuff...

(F U B2 D) //EO+rzp 4/4
(U2 R' F' D2 R2 F) //2c3 2e with variations 6/10
R' B2 D2 R B2 L //HTR 6/16
(U2 D2 B2) 2e+slice //3/19
(B2 L2 F2 R2 F2 L2) //solved 6-3/22
You can insert the 2e for slice in 21 outside HTR but no +0.
EDIT: I'm an idiot. You can insert in yet another spot for slice in 21 and that is actually +0...

There are 21 move solutions from this set of DRs but none seem trivial to me. Findable but not trivial.

Also had:
(F' U B2 D) L (F2 B2 R' F2 L) //4a1 4e in 10 with variations. 21 opt but needs extensions or 3qt I think.
(F' U B2 D) L , F2 R2 U2 L2 U2 B //4b2 2e in 11 with again tons of variations. 1 seems to be 20 opt but no way I find this since I have 4a1 4e AND 2c3 2e variation hells in 10 already...

Nice sub22 mean this week! Altough I missed 19 on A2 and 21 this attempt. 20 for this attempt I dont even count as miss since, just no way.

(R2 F2 U) //EO 3/3
F , R2 B2 L' R U2 R F //4b2 4e with lots of variations. 8/11
R'^ U2 F2 R' //HTR 4/15
F2 R2^ D2 B2 U2 R2 U2 //slice 7-1/21
^=M2 //+1/22

Only set of DRs I had. Missed the +2 rzp for the 19...

(B2 F D) //EO 3/3
(L) (F' U2 B' L) //2c3 2e 5/8
(B U2 B'^) D2 F2 R2 B' //HTR 7/15
L2 D2 L2 B2^^ R2 //slice 5/20
^=w
^^=S' //+1/21

Almost missed this since I normally dont check 2c3->4a1->NISS but now I found this and the 9 move 2c3 early so I had more time to look for finish.

Other DR I had:
(B2 F D) (L) R2 F U2 F R //2c3 2e in 9
I had an early 22 backup from this:
(U2 D2 Bw' U2 B U2 F R2 U2 D2 Fw' F' L2) //HTR in 16, slice in 21, 22 final. 

F' (L R2 F) //EO 4/4
(R') (U' D' L2 F2 U' L) //2c3 2e 7/11
B2 U^ L2 U'^ L2 D^^ //HTR 6/17
R2 U2^ F2 R2 //slice 4/21
^=w
^^=E2 //+1/22

R U' D' R //EO + jzp 4/4
(L2 B2 D B2 U) //2c5 5/9
F R2 F' (B R2 B2 L2 B U2 B) //HTR 10/19
(L2 D2 R2 L2) //solved 4/23

(R' F2 B R F) //EO 5/5
(U' R') (U' L' D L') //2c5 6/11
D B2 U^ (D L2 F2 D^ L2 D') //HTR 9/20
(L2 U2^ B2 L2 F2 R2) //slice 6/26
^=w //+0

Horrible scramble. Only sub12 DR I had. Seems like if you dont use a NISS 5-mover you wont have anything good...

U (U' R U) //EO+rzp 7c8e 4/4
R F2 L F' R' B //DR 4c4 6/10 2 variations
(R F2 L) L2 U2 F2 L' U2 L //HTR 9/19
U2 D2 B2 L2 U2 //solved 5/24

Also had:
U (U' R U) (F) B2 D2 L2 B2 L B //2c4 in 11. 23 opt with D2 R -> NISS
(U' F) R' F' , R (D' F2 L2 U2 L) //4c4 in 10 with 2 variations. 24 opt

(F2 B L U) //EO 4/4
(B' L) (F2 L2 F' D2 B L) //2c3 4e already in sq+sq 8/12
(R2 F R2 F R2 D2 B) //HTR 7/19
(R2 F2 R2 L2 D2 L2) //solved 6/25

(U L) //EO 2/2
(B') (U D L2 U2 F' L2 B') //4b2 2e 8/10
(R2 B2 L2 U' B2 D) //HTR 6/16
(R2 U2 R2 L2 B2) //slice 5/21
widen all //+0/21
Simple and easy optimal from DR for once :)

Also had:
(R2 U L' (D') (L2 F2 R2 F B2 D) //4b2 4e in 10
And several variations of 4b2 2e/4e in 11 from those same EOs.
EDIT: apparently one of those had a 20...

U2 L' D2 F' //EO 4/4
U (B2 U2 L' U2 L U) //2c3 4e 7/11
D2 R U2 [L' F2 R] //HTR 6/17
F2 D2 * F2 //2e2e+slice 20/21
*= D2 F2 D' U' R2 D U F2 //slice 8-8//20
[]=Lw L2 F2 Rw //+1/21

Also spend a lot of time on this but it didnt want to finish:
(R' D' R' F') (D') (L F2 L2 U) //2c4 in 9 but it didnt want to finish. Both variations are 22 opt with kinda hard optimals it seems...

R2 B' //EO 2/2
U2 L , F2 B2 D' R2 D' R //4b2 2e 8/10
(U2 R2 F2 L2 U^ R2 D'^) //HTR 7/17
(F2 U2^ [L2 U2 R2]) //double slice 5-1/21
[]= L R B2 L R //slice. cancel with normal +1/22
^=w //+0/22
Almost missed this since there is a 1 move shorter leave slice from same HTR but it is +2 at best.

Also had:
R2 B , D' R , U R2 L2 U' D2 R //4a1 in 10 but doesnt seem promising. Bad bound on both sides and no 1 move reductions to 0c0 or 4b2 2e... Turns out to be 23 opt.

F' R2 U' B //EO 4/4
D , F2 U2 L U2 L' R2 U //4a1 4e 8/12. 5-move HTRs on normal, 4-move HTRs on inverse.
U' D' L2 U D' B2 R' //HTR 7-2/17. I saw this with D2 and then do the U' D L2 U D' B2 3e alg to insert final edge with cancellations.
D2 F2 D2 L2 //2e2e 4/21
L2 D2 L2 U2 R2 U2 //solved 6-4/23

(L) U' F' R L' //EO+rzp 4c6e 5/21
F2 U D B U2 F //2c4 in 11 with 4 variations 11/21
(U'^ B2 U R2 U' R2 U'^) // HTR 7/18. There were 2 7 move DRs on inverse so I switched those and tried all variations.
(F2 D2^ L2) //slice 3/21
^=w //+0/21

Only set of DRs I had. And got the super lucky 10 move finish from 2c4...

horrible scramble. Only had 2c4 in 11 and that didnt want to finish...

L' F' U //EO 3/3
F' , U2 R2 F2 B2 R F //2c3 2e 7/10
(B2 L^ F2 L U2 F2 L^) //HTR 7/17
(B2 D2 L2^ B2 D2 F2) //slice 6-1/22
^=w //+0/22

Another DR I looked at was:
R2 D' F' D (R2 D' R2 D) //2c4 in 8. 21 opt with 6qt :D

(U2 D R) //EO+rzp 3/3
(B2 R2 B2 D' B) //4b2 4e 5/8
B2 U (R2 B2 U') //HTR 5/13
(F2 R2 B2 U2 R2 B2) //slice 6/19
+2/21

Also had a 20 move leave slice with 4qt but that is also +2.
DR opt is 20 but the path is hard (4qt with 2 moves to 4a1 4e and then 3qt from there) so not mad.

Also nice mo3 this week! 20,22,21 = 21.00

(U') L2 B' U' //EO 4/4
L' (F B2 R' F2 U2 R') //2c3 4e with variations 7/11
F2 L2 B'^ R2 U2 B'^ R2 F'^^ //HTR from normal so we can whack the variations 8/19
L2 B2 //leave slice once we get the correct variation 2/21 
^=w
^^=S2 //+1/22

Also had
(U) L2 B' U' F (L' F2 U2 L B) //2c3 4e in 10. 23opt.

L B (F) //EO+rzp 3c2e 3/3
L2 F2 U' R D' R //4c3 6/9
L2 U F2 U L2 D2 F2 ^ D' //first HTR I tried 4/17
R2 L2 //2e+slice 2/19
^=F2 D2 B2 U2 B2 D2 //solved 6-5/20

Very simple 20 and cubelib doesnt give anything sub20 so unless someone pulls a weird 19 then woaj will be tied times million :D
I bounded after L2 U F2 U so I already knew the bound was low but it turned out to be only +1 to the lower bound.
Also the insertion is just a standard +1 DR trigger extension but I saw it this way first.

Other DRs:
L' B' D' B , U R2 D2 L D' L //4b2 2e in 10. 23opt
D L , U2 D2 B , U2 L2 D R2 F //2c3 2e in 10. 22opt

(F L' D' L) //EO 4/4
(U) (F' L2 B2 U' B2 U) //4c3 7/11
(B) U2 R2 D2 F^ L2 U2 B'^ //HTR 8/19
D2 L2 F2^ R2 B2 //slice 5-1/23
^=w //+0/23

(F L U' R F') //EO+rzp 5/5
(D' L2 R2 F2 D' R') //2c3 2e 6/11
(U'^ F2 R2 U' F2 L2 U^) //HTR 7/18
(R2 L2 D2 R2) //2e+slice 4/22
(R2 D2 R' L' F2 R L D2) //2e2e alg to leave slice 8-6/24
^=w //+0/24
DR opt.

Tough scramble. All good solutions cubelib gives are from NISS 5 move EOs. I only checked linear 5 movers and all 4 movers.

Only other DR I looked at was:
(F L U' R F) L (L2 F2 U2 R D' R) //4b2 2e in 12 but also 24 opt.

B R' F' L //EO+rzp 4c4e 4/23
(B2 R2 F B' L2 F U) //4a2 4e also F' B variation 7/11
(F^ L2 F2^ D2 F') //HTR 5/16
(U2 B2 L2 U2 R2 B2 L2) //slice 7-1/22
^=S2 //+1/23

DR has a unique 22opt but that is either 9 move linear HTR or 2HT+qt and then NISS so not too bad of a miss.

Also had:
B D F , D' L (D R2 D L2 U' L) //4c3 in 11, 24opt
B (D L B) F2 D U2 F2 B2 R //2c4 in 10, 23opt

(B' U' D) //EO 3/3
(L) (R2 F' L2 B' L2 F2 R) //2c3 4e with 4 HTR equivalent variations 8/11
B^ (L2 B2 D2 F' R2 F'^) //HTR 7/18
(U2 L2 D2 F2 R2) //slice 5/23
^=w //+0

Also had:
(B F2 U D') (R') (B' R2 F L2 F2 L) //2c3 4e in 11. Kind of just 4 more variations of the above.
And
R L F U D , F D2 B' R2 F' R //2c3 2e in 11 but it sucks... 

U2 F2 R' D' //EO 4/4
L , R2 U2 F' R2 F R //2c3 4e 7/11
(R2 B U2 B'^ L2 F^) //HTR 6/17
(D2 B2^ U2 D2) //slice 4/21
^=w //+0/21

Also had:
(B U F L) //eo+RZP 4c4e on both axis
B2 U B2 D' B //4a2 2e in 9. 22opt with 4qt