U L' B D' F //E0+rzp
(R' B2 L U2 L' U') //DR 4b2 4e 11/22
([L F2 U2 L') //HTR 15/22
(U2 B2 U2 B2 R2]) //slice 20/22
[]= R U2 B2 R' U2 B2 R2 L2 D2 F2 L2 //+2 22/22

Optimal from DR. Only DR I had. Missed the 2+2 EO that gave 19...

B' R' B //EO+rzp 4c4e
(R' F2 L2 F2 U) //DR 2c3 6e 8/20
L'^ (D2 L2^ D2 L' D2 L'^) //HTR 15/20
U2 L2^ F2 D2 F2 //slice 20/20
^=w //+0

19 optimal from DR :/

(B R' U') //EO+rzp 4c4e
(R2 U2 F' U2 L2 B) //DR 4b2 4e 9/21 with variations.
L2 D2 L2 D2 R' F2 U2 R' //HTR 17/21
B F' L2 F' B' //solved 21/21

optimal from all variations.

21.00 mo3. Nice! but 2nd solve was still kind of dissappointing.
Great set of scrambles. 20, 17, 21 findable 19.33 at least. But 17 was kind of hard...

(L) B2 L' //EO+rzp 4c4e
B' R2 F' R2 F D //DR 2c3 2e 9/22
(R2 F^ R2 F' D2 R2 F^) //HTR 16/22
R2 F2^ D U F2 L2 U' D //slice 24-2 = 22/22
^=w //+0 22/22

Such a disappointing result. Many short DRs with good subset. There is even a 19 from that 8 move 4b2 but it seems really hard to find... And so did the 20-21 move solutions as well...

Other DRs I looked at:
(L) B2 L B L2 F B2 D //4b2 2e in 8, 19 opt
(L) B2 L B L2 F B2 D //4b2 2e in 9, 21opt

Apparently there is also a 17 if you do rzp in 6 but I aint doing that on a scramble like this...

D2 F' R F' //EO
L (D' L D2 * L) //DR 4c3 9/20
U F2 U'^ L2 D2^ F2 D^ //HTR 16/20
F2 //2e+slice 17/20
*= D2 L2 U2 L2 D2 R2 //slice 6-3 = 20/20
=w //+0 20/20

Beats Mallard (EO=5, rzp=5, DR=11) by 1! Rare achievement for me still. Very happy with this. 

(B' L U F' D) //EO+rzp 4c4e
(R2 U2 L2 F2 L F) //DR 4a1 2e 11/24
R ^ B2 U2 B2 L' B2 ^ L //HTR 18/24
F2 B2 U2 B2 R2^^ //slice 23/24
^=M
^^=M2 //+1 24/24

D' F2 D //EO+rzp 3c2e
B2 D2 B2 F L' F' //DR 2c3 4e 9/21
(U2 L^ D2 L F2 R'^) //HTR 15/21
(F2 U2 B2 U2 R2^ D2) //slice 21/21
^=w //+0

F' R B' //EO+rzp 4c4e
L F2 D2 U2 R' D' //DR 4c3 9/23
(B2 R^) L2 B2 L'^^ F2 L^ //HTR 16/23
U' D' B2 R2 D U' //slice 22/23
^=w
^^=M2 //+1 23/23
Optimal from DR is 22 but really hard to find.

Other DRs:
L2 F' R B' , L' F2 D2 R' D //2c3 4e in 9. 21 optimal with 5qt but really findable 22.
F' R B' , L , (F2 D U L2 D' L) //2c3 4e in 10. 22 optimal but somewhat hard.

Missed 22 altough all 3 DRs had a findable 22...

R2 U2 F2 U' //EO+rzp 4c4e
D2 B2 F' D2 F D2 L' //DR 4b2 2e 11/23
U2 D2 F' ^ L2 B //HTR 16/23
L2 U2 F2 L2 ^^ B2 U2 //slice 22/23
^=S
^^=S' //+1 23/23
optimal from DR

Other DR:
R2 D2 B2 U , B2 F' D2 F' U2 R //4b2 4e in 10, 23 optimal

R (D2 L) //EO
D2 F (U D R2 F2 U B') //DR 2c4 11/24
(U') U' B2 [U' L2 D' //HTR 17/24
F2 B2 U2] F2 B2 R2 //slice 23/24
[]= U2 D F2 U' F2 B2 D2 //+1 24/24

Optimal from DR is 23 and easy to find but I wasted time on 4b2 4e in 11 and this HTR that leaves a double slice in 18 but this 24 seems to be the best possible from that unfortunately...

Other DRs:
R' (D2 L) F' U (F B2 L2 B R2 D) //4b2 4e in 11 that I wasted a lot of time on. 24 optimal.
R B D L' , U , (U2 F D2 L2 B U) //2c3 6e in 11. 24 optimal.

2nd solve was only good one this week. Missed a linear 4 move  EO on 1st and some simple DRs on this one...

F (R D' F') //EO+rzp 4c4e
U2 R' B2 R' B2 R U' //DR 4c3 11/22
L^ D2 L'^ (U2 D2 L) //HTR 17/22
(F2 B2 D2 R2 F2) //slice 22/22
^=w //+0

Optimal from all my DRs. Also Mallard only gives 21 from 1 single 5 move EO so 22 is a good result.

Other DRs:
F (R D' F) , U' F2 U2 D' L D2 R //4c3 in 11, 24 optimal
F (D' R2 F) , (D' L) D U R2 U R //2c4 in 11, 23 optimal

Also funnily I found this as a "variation" of my final DR:
F (R D' F) U2 [R' B2 R' B2 R] U //4c3 in 11
But quickly realised that it is not actually a variation but exactly identical to the other DR since
[]= L' D2 R' D2 L //identity since B2 B2 is an obvious I-sequence...

(D' R2 L' B) //EO
(D') L2 U2 R U2 L' D //DR 2c3 4e 11/24
(R2 B2 L' F2 D2 L U2 R) //HTR 19/24
(B2 D U B2 U D) //slice 26-2 = 23/24
widen everything for +1 24/24

Only DR I had.

LOL, completely missed the good 4 move EO everyone used...

(L D' F2 L) //EO
(D' B) (D R2 F' D2 F') //DR 4b2 2e 11/24
(L2 U^ F2 R2 L2 D'^) //HTR 17/24
(R2 F2 D2^ R2 B2 D2 L2) //slice 24/24
^=w

WTF WAS THAT SCRAMBLE!!!

D2 B2 U //EO+jzp 4c6e 3/18
B2 R B2 L //DR 4a2 4e 7/18
 U2 B (D2 F2 D2 R2 F) //HTR 14/18
(R2 U2 B2 D2) //solved 18/18

7 moves to 4a2 4e. There was also 8 moves to 4c3 (L2 F) (U L U' R' D2 L)

R' L' (F L) //EO 4/23
(B) F2 D2 R2 D' B' //DR 4b2 2e 10/23
(L2 [U' F2 B2 R2 U') //HTR with extension 16/23
(L2 F2 L2 U2] B2 R2) //slice 22/23
[]= D' L2 R2 F2 U' B2 L2 B2 U D //+1 23/23

Literally the only sub5 EO on the scramble gave 10 move 4b2 2e :D and from 10 bad axis too.
DR is 22 optimal but all optimals seemed quite hard. But I missed a trivial DR variation that has an easy 22...

(U2 D2 F') //EO 3/23
(L') B2 L2 D' L2 D L' //DR 2c4 2e 10/23
(U^) F2 D R2 B2 D R2 * D'^ //HTR 18/23
B2 R2 //2e2e+slice 20/23
*= R2 D2 L2 R2 U2 L2 //slice 6-3 = 23/23
^=w //+0

Optimal from this DR but a variation has 22.

(R' [D F' B) //EO4/22
(R' L2 D L2 U2 R)] //DR 4c3 with at least 16 variations! 10/22

First I went to normal and found that just doing U there will reduce to 4b2 4e.
Then I got back to inverse and tried all variations with that U reduction.
2 variations gave a case that was directly setup to a trigger:
[]= (D F B' L' R2 U L2 U2 L') //new DR 4c3 in 10
U^ (U^ F2 R2 U) //HTR 15/22

First I saw this leave slice: invert the last move (F2 R2 U2 L2 F2 L2 F2 U2) //slice in 22 but +2
Then I decided to NISS the HTR since 15 to HTR is kind of short and it seems kind of blocky.
on normal this is easy to see: 
F2 R2 U2 L2 F2 L2 F2 //slice 22/22  
^=w //and this slice is much better and gives +0 for 22/22

I dont really know how to analyse this since there are so many variations :D But I feel like my approach was reasonable implementation of "whack the variations".

EDIT: as far as I can tell there are no findable sub22 from this set of DRs. There is a 19 if you just add a random U2 before the F B in EO but good luck finding that...

(F') U2 D' B //EO 4/24
F2 D' , L U2 D R' D //DR 2c3 4e 11/24
(B2 [L U2 L' F2 L']) //HTR 17/24
(D U' L2 F2 U D') //slice 23-1 = 22/24
[]= L2 R' F2 L R2 U2 R' //+2

Annoying solve. Had this slice in 22 and 3 different slices from 2 different DRs in 23 but still no better than 24. :/