R' U' F L2 R2 F2 R U2 L' U2 F2 L2 F R' U F' L2 D' B F U' F2 R' U' F
L2 F L2 U2 B R2 F L2 D2 L2 F' B' R2 U' F2 R2 B' D2 B2 L U D' F' R
"(R’ F U’ D L’) // EO(5/5) (B2 D2 B R2 F2 U) // DR, 2c3 4e(6/11) L2 F L2 U2 B R2 [B // HTR(7/18) D2 R2 D2 B2] R2 // LS(5/23) [] = F L2 D2 L2 F’ B’(+1/24) This dr had 6 variations, from which there are 2 easy and different 23s. First there’s: R2 B L2 R2 D2 F’ D2 F // HTR(8/19) U’ D F2 U’ D // finish(5-1/23) I think i checked this htr from a different variation and didn’t switch it, but i had this written down: (D2 L2 B U2 F’ D2 F) // HTR in 18 And i don’t understand how in the world i didn’t see R L F2 R L’ finish, which is just 2 moves to M slice and +3 on the spot There is also a 22 from a eo that i missed, skull: R F D L U //eo-ud (5/5) (R' F2 U2 R' F') //dr-lr-eoud (5/10) L U2 B2 R F2 L D2 F2 L //htr-lr (9/19) R2 B2 R2 //finish (3/22) "
R' U' F R' D' B' U B' L D' B L2 D F R2 F U2 B' D2 F' R2 D2 R' U' F
L' B U2 R2 D2 F' U2 F R2 F2 B' R2 D' F' R2 U2 F' U' L U2 F D2
"L’ (D2 F’ U2 L’) // EO(5/5) (U) // DR-4E4C(1/6) (F U2 R2 F D) // DR, 4b2 4e(5/11) B’ (R2 B’ L2 B’ L2 B) // HTR(7/18) (U2 L2 D2 F2) // LS(4/22) (...[B’ L2 B’ L2 B U2 L2 D2 F2 B]..) [] = B F2 R2 F’ U2 F D2 R2 U2 B’(+0/22) Other drs: B’ R U L’ F (B2 R’ U L D) // 4a4 in 10 (R B U’ L2 D’) (F L’ B’ R B) // 2c4 in 10 B’ F L’ D’ F U2 L’ U2 R L’ U // 2c4 in 11 64 eos checked This is the one solve out of 6 of which i’m truly proud of, and getting a unique woaj single on such a comp feels great. Mallard also doesn’t find a sub22 without a premove on 5mover "
R' U' F D2 B2 D2 R' U' R2 U B2 U L2 R2 D L D F L F' R D R' U' F
L U2 F2 R' U2 R U' R' B2 U2 L' B2 L' F2 D2 F2 L2 F2 B2 D2 R2 D' F' U D' R'
"(R U’ D F) // EO(4/4) (D) // DR-4E4C(1/5) L U2 F2 R’ U2 R U’ // DR, 2c3 4e(7/12) R’ B2 U2 L’ B2 L’ // HTR(6/18) F2 D2 F2 L2 F2 B2 D2 R2 // finish(8/26) Other dr: (U’ R D F) D (R’ F2 R2 U2 R’ U’) // 2c4 in 11, worked for all my time on this, but best i found was a 25 to slice. 24 is findable by doing a 7move trigger on 2c3 2e which i should’ve found, and optimal 23 is meh 19 eos checked Mallard finds an easy 21 from an extension of 4 bad that i didn’t write down, sad (L2 R' U D' B) //eo-fb (5/5) (L) //rzp-fb (1/6) F2 R' B2 R' //dr-ud-eofb (4/10) (R2 D' L2 R2 F2 D B2 U) //htr-ud (8/18) (F2 D2 F2) //finish (3/21) "
R' U' F U' R' F' B2 U D2 R B2 D' F' L2 D2 L2 B2 U2 F2 B' D' R' U' F
R2 L2 U F2 U' B2 R2 U D F2 D2 F' R2 B D' R2 F2 B' L' D2
"(D2 L) // EO(2/2) (B) // DR-4C6E(1/3) (F2 R2 D B’ R2 F’) // DR, 4b2 2e(6/9) L2 R2 U F2 [D’ // HTR(5/14) R2 F2 D2] F2 D2 // LS(5/19) [] = U’ B2 R2 U D(+1/20) Other drs: U D’ F D’ B U2 L2 U R2 U // 4b2 4e in 10 U D’ F’ D’ B (D2 R’ U R U) // 2c4 in 10 U D B’ D’ F D2 F2 D // 2c3 4e in 8 but bad Around 40 eos checked This one really hurts, like REALLY hurts I was happy for finding this dr with rzp into 4c6e at like 10 minutes, but when i left the attempt it turned out that you can actually get an easy 18 from dr in 8 from this rzp by doing B’ instead of B and L2 after that, i distinctly remember trying B’ and i didn’t like something and didn’t found the dr. and it gives an easy 18. I am extremely mad at myself for missing this, and it threw me off for a better half of the next attempt. If i didn’t find the rzp at all or this was at least 19 and not 18 i’d be not as mad and sad, but the fact that i was so close and such a stupid miss cost me nr single really hurts "
R' U' F D' R D L' B' D' F U2 F U2 F' R2 F2 R B2 U' R' U' F
F2 U L2 U2 D B' R2 F2 U R2 U' D2 R2 B2 R2 B2 L2 U2 F2 L' F' R D B2
"(B2 D’ R’ F L) // EO(5/5) F2 U L2 D U2 B’ // DR, 4b2 2e(6/11) R2 F2 U R2 U’ // HTR(5/16) D2 R2 B2 R2 B2 L2 U2 F2 // finish(8/24) Other drs: D’ B U2 L F’ L’ F2 B2 R’ D // 4b2 2e in 10 but really bad D’ B U2 L F (R’ U2 B2 R’ U) // 2c4 in 10, from which i had the htr for 23 but missed it, such a skull (R’ F B D L) (F2 D2 B’ U2 F’ U) // 2c3 4e in 11 (R) R2 F2 R B’ D’ F’ U B’ U // 2c5 in 10 48 eos checked The dr i used in final is actually 22 optimal and that the best you can get from scramble, but you have to do R U2 R to solve corners on normal and niss trace that it’s 4 moves to htr on inverse, which i didn’t think to do before but will totally add to what i check on 4b2 now "
R' U' F L' F' D' B2 L' F D B D R L2 F' R2 U2 B2 U2 R2 B U R' U' F
U2 L U2 B2 R2 L2 U' R2 U B2 R2 D L2 U' R' L2 U' R' L2 U2 B R2 U'
"(U R2 B’) // EO(3/3) U2 L // DR-2E3C(2/5) (U2 L2 R U R) // DR, 2c4(5/10) (L2 [D F2 U’ L2 F2 U’ L2 U) // HTR(9/19) (L2 R2 F2 D2]) // LS(4/23) [] = U L2 D’ R2 B2 U’ R2 U L2 R2 B2 U2(+0/23) Other drs: (D2 L U’ F’) (R2 D2 F2 L2 U’ L) // 2c3 4e in 10 L2 U’ D B L’ R B2 R U // 4b5 in 9 32 eos checked There is an easy 20 from an rzp i didn’t switch because of not very good arm, but i should’ve since it’s rzp in 4, and the dr is obvious: L U' F' D //eo-ud (4/4) (L' D2 R' D2 B' L' F') //dr-lr-eoud (7/11) (L U2 L' B2 D2 R') //htr-lr (6/17) (U2 F2 L2) //finish (3/20) Other than that there don’t seem to be any other reasonable solutions sub23 except switching (D2 L U’ F) rzp and doing additional rzp on normal "