55min50sec
1. F2 L
2. (D2)
3. (U' B D B D')
4. (D' B U B' U2 D B)
5. (R' U' R) {4e/4c}@[17]
Found:
2-0: U R' [B'] R U' -> {5c}@[21]
5-2: F' U' L' [U] L U F -> {3c}@[24] -> 4-3 U2 L D' L' U2 L D L' -> {}@[30]
Went back and checked {5c}@[21] case a bit but didn't get very far.

59min10sec
{21'1'e/4e}@[18] +[3] -> {3e/5c} +[8] -> {3c} +[7] -> {}

Due to time, almost took an 8-mover for last 3c-cycle, but had a little time and found net [7] a move away.

57min40sec
{3e/3c}@[20] +[8] -> {3c} +[5] -> {}

44min40sec
I shouldn't have started this one when I was already feeling tired.

Okay, I came back to this the following evening with a fresh start, and this is at least acceptable. May be able to tweak it a bit more, but just wanted to get it done, and had already spent about an hour on it, just for this new attempt.
1. L F R2 R
2. (F')
3. (U' B')
4. B L2 B
5. F' L' F U2 L2 U
6. L {4e/3'2'c}@[17] Went with this.
Alternates:
6. L' {4e/3'2'c}@[17]
7. L2 {22e/3'1'1'c}@[17]

5-2: F' R2 D' [B'] D R2 F {3e/3'1'c}@[23]
5-3: L B [L'] B' L' {3e/5c}@[22]
2-1: F2 [D] F2 {3e/2'21'c}@[19] Went with this.

4-1: U' F' [R' B2 R B2] F U -> {3c}@[27], but I could have check a couple more moves to see if there was something better but this is where I just wanted to get done.
5-2: L2 F R' F' L2 F R F' -> {}@[32]

58min30sec
{3e/5c}@[22] +[6] -> {5c} +[5]+[4] -> {}

44min40sec
I shouldn't have started this one when I was already feeling tired.

57min50sec
1. R D2
2. B2
3. (U R' B' R)
4. R' F' F2
5. D' F2 L' F L
6. L D' L' {3e/2'2'c}@[17]
6-1: L D [L' B' L B] D' L' -> {4c-type}@[24], I almost went for this but realized the following, which involved adding in a corner that was already solved, but it completely fixes one of the 2' cycles, so {3c} in only one more move
5-4: B2 D' [F L F' L'] D B2 -> {3c}@[25]
4-2: F R B R' F' R B' R' -> {}@[27]

58min20sec
1. (U2)
2. (L' B2 D')
3. (F' B')
4. F R B2
5. B' D2 B D' {22e/5c}@[12]
2-2: B2 R L' D2 R' L -> {3e/5c}@[15]
5-1: B [B R2 B' R2] B' -> {5c}@[19]
Didn't have much time to deal with {5c} well and ended up just taking +[7]+[7] -> {}

73min20sec
1. L'
2. (R)
3. (L B)
4. B'
5. F' D'
6. (R F D2)
7. (R F2 R2) {21'1'c/6c}@[13] Chased this for a while, but didn't find anything and just needed to get something to work and still struggled.
Alt.
7. (F' R2 F R2)
8. F2 R2
9. (R' F' D' F2 D F2) {3e/22'1'c}@[21] +[5] -> {3c} +[7] -> {}

60min30sec
Had like 10 extra minutes and tried to optimize final insertions a bit more, but am tired, and then missed a primed in typing, also can't count because I thought this was a [29], but let's see...
1. U2 R2
2. (D2)
3. F' L' D F2 D'
4. U'
5. (F' L2 F)
6. B L B' {3e/5c}@[15]
7. B' U' L' U L B {5c}@[20]
Went with {3e/5c}@[15]:
6-1: L' [D L' D' L] L -> {3'1'c}@[19]...here it is, I miscounted this as [20]
5-0: B L F L' B' L F' L' -> {3c}@[23]
5-3: F' L' B L F L' B' L -> {}@[28]

58min20sec
{22e/5c}@[18]
Found:
+[3] -> {3e/3'1'c}@[21] could only find +[10] -> {3c} here, so went with following option
or
+[5] -> {3e/3c}@[23] +[6] -> {3c}@[29] and found +[7] -> {}, out of time to check about 5 moves of the skeleton, but there's basically no way this would have been <[30].

48min20sec
A bit tired after "Berkeley Fall 2026"
{3e/3'1'c}@[24] +[6] -> {3c} +[4] -> {}

{4e/4'1'c}@[19] +[9] -> {22c} +[5]+[7] -> {}

55min10sec
1. U2 L D L'
2. B R' D' B R'
3. B' D2 B D' B2
4. D2
5. (D')
6. (B' L B2 L' B') {3e/2'2'c}@[21]
I believe it was {3e/5c} if I made the last turn in inverse space B instead of B', but I like {3e/2'2'c} better.
6-3: B [B2 L' B2 L] B' -> {3c}@[25]
6-3-3: L D' R' D L' D' R D -> {}[31]
There was at least one other 6-mover for the last 3c-cycle, but never say anything better than that.

63min00sec
Terrible skeleton and it took me forever just to get that one. It's not that bad of a case to deal with, but at [21] moves, who cares anymore, and then I had rush the {3e/3c} and ended up taking a pure 3e-cycle to get to {3c}.
{2e/2'1'c}@[21] +[4] -> {3e/3c} +[7] -> {3c} +[7] -> {}

63min00sec

58min30sec
{2'1'e/4c}@[18] +[3] -> {3e/3c} +[7] -> {3e] +[6] -> {}

57min30sec
1. (R' D R)
2. (U L2)
3. (B)
4. L' D' L2 U2
5. (U F2 U')
6. (R' F' R' F)
7. (R) {3e/3'1'c}@[18]
Found:
3-0: U2 [F' D' F D] U2 -> {3'1'c}@[23]
4-1: B D L2 [B' R' B R] L2 D' B' -> {3c}@[28]

Felt these were pretty equivalent, but had some time for {3'1'c} and felt as long as I could get <[5] -> {3c} it was worthwhile.
Sure enough, found:
2-2: U L U' R2 U L' U' R2 -> {3c}@[27] and then figured I better wrap things up and took:
7-1: R D' L' D R' D' L D -> {}@[33]

58min20sec
1. L2 F D2
2. B2 U2
3. F2 R2 F
4. B
5. (R D' R') {2'1'e/4'1'c}@[12]
6. (D' B D' B' D) {3e/22c}@[17]
Alt.
4. B' D R' B R
5. D' B D B {3e/31'1'c}@[17]

Went for {2'1'e/4'1'c}@[12] and found:
5-1: L2 U' [F'] U L2 {3e/5c}@[17]
2-0: U' B' [U'] B U {3e/3'1'c}@[17]

Took {3e/5c}@[17], but only found 2-0: F' [U B L B' L' U'] F -> {5c}@[25]
Short on time, but was a bit lucking in quickly finding +[6]+[5] -> {}.
5-1-4: U L D L' U' L D' L' +[6] -> {3c}
5-1-2: U L' U' R' U L U' R +[5] -> {}

55min30sec
1. R B' F L' F'
2. (U L' U2 B' U' B')
3. (U B' U B)
4. U2
5. U L2 U' L {3e/5c}@[19]
Alt.
5. U L2 U' L' {3e/5c}@[19]
Went for first one found:
2-6: +[9] -> {5c}
2-5: +[5] -> {5c}
2-3: +[9] -> {3c}
2-1: B [F U F' U'] B' +[5] -> {3c}
Then {3c} +[7] -> {} was the best I could find: 5-1: U2 R D' R' U2 R D R'

Went back to 2nd {3e/5c} case and found +[6] -> {3c} figured this was decent since as long as I had less than +[6] -> {} it would be better, but was basically out of time. I was only able to find net [6] 3c-cycles in overtime.

57min50sec
1. R
2. (U)
3. (D2 F L' F2)
4. L' F2
5. R B R2 B {31'1'e/3'1'c}@[12]
Alt.
5. R2
6. (R B' R')
7. (D B' D')
8. (R D' R' D B) {3e/3'1'c}@[20]
Alt.
7. (R' B' R) {21'1'e/4'1'c}@[14]
8. (B) {22e/2'2'1'c}@[15]
Alt.
8. (B') {22e/5c}@[15]

Went for the last {22e/5c}@[15] case. Theoretically would have checked them both out, but too time consuming.
3-0: U' B D [B2] D' B' U -> {5c}@[22] +[6]+[4] -> {}