U' D' L2 B' // EO (4/4)
L' (U' B2 D' R) // DR 2c3q (5/9)
B2 U' B2 L2 U' L2 U // HTR (7/16)
R2 B2 R2 B2 U2 R2 // finish (6-1/21)

D (L D) // EO+DR-2e4c (3/3)
F' B2 R' B2 R // DR 4b2q (5/8)
(R2 F' D2 R2 L2 F) // HTR (6/14)
F2 R2 D2 F2 D2 F2 R2 U2 // finish (8/22)


Dissapointing result given the DR ;(

B F D' L // EO+JZP (4/4)
(U2 F D2 F') // DR 2c3q (4/8)
(D L2 U' B2 U') // HTR (5/13)
(D2 F2 R' L' D2 R L) // AB3E (7-2/18)

Skeleton: B F D' R' D2 [L R F2 D2] U B2 U L2 D' F D2 F' U2

[] -> U2 F2 D2 R' L' B2 // finish (+2/20)


Another stupid scramble on this league yaayy

(D') U L D // EO (4/4)
(F L' B2 F R' B') // DR 2c3q (6/10)
B2 U2 L^ F2 U2 R U2 R'^ // HTR (8/18)
U2 L2 U2 L2^ // leave slice (4/22)

^w // finish (+0/22)

58 EO's checked.
Checking the EO's in the order I wrote them was not the best idea here: the EO from the final solution was the one I checked the last xD
Sad that there was a 21 to slice that was +2 optimal from the DR:
(F2 U2 L') U2 L' B2 L' // HTR
B2 L2 U2 B2 // LS

(F2 R) L' U R // EO (5/5)
(D, F' L2 B' D' B D' ^ ) // DR 2c3q (7/12)
B (B' L2 F' D2 F') // HTR (6/18)
(R2 F2 L2 B2) // AB3E (4-1/21)

^ (U D' F2 U' D R2) // finish (6-1/26)


What a trash scramble lol.
I had this skeleton as a backup early in the attempt, but I didn't find anything remotely better ;(

B D2 L' U // EO+DR-4e4c (4/4)
F2 R F2 L B' // DR 0q4e (5/9)
[R2 U2 L] U2 D2 R // HTR (6/15)
U2 F2 // leave slice (2/17)

[] -> R L F2 R // finish (+1/18)

I'm happy with the way I managed this insane scramble: I rushed to every 4 move EO I wrote looking only at the premade RZP's and then proceed with the 3 movers and the 2 mover. I spent some time with the other way of extending the DR via inserting a B2, and then I magically remembered that extending with F2 was also a thing :)

(U D') F' U' // EO (4/4)
(L') F U2 B' R2 F' L // DR 2c3q (7/11)
(R2 F U2 [F R2 U2 F') // HTR (7/18)
(R2 F2 B2] U2 D2) // finish (5/23)

[] -> (F' B2 L2 D2 F' L2) // shortening (-1/22)

Solution: F' U' F U2 B' R2 F' L U2 D2 L2 F D2 L2 B2 F U2 F' R2 L U' D 

Missed 21 from the DR :(

F R' (B2 L) // EO+JZP (4/4)
(B2 R2 U B2 D) // DR 4a2e (5/9)
F' (F2 D2 R2 F) // HTR (5/14)
L2 U2 B2 D2 F2 U2 R2 U2 // finish (8/22)

I missed the 20 moves finish from 4q ;(

R (F B' R') // EO (4/4)
(D) B2 R2 L2 F' U // DR 1q (6/10)
R2 L2 F2 L2 D2 B // HTR (6/16)
L2 U D B2 D2 F2 U' D // finish (8-2/22)



I also worked with 

R (B' L2 F R)
L2 D' F2 U' F // DR 2c3q

that had a 21 to slice with no +0

From the F (B' R B) there was a 21 from a 4b4e DR that I had but I didn't try the right 4q paths.

R2 U // EO (2/2)
(U2 F' L B) // DR 4c4q (4/6)
(D2 R' U2 L'^ F2 R2 U2 R^ B2 R) // HTR (10/16)
(F2 B2 D2 R2^) // leave slice (4/20)

^w // finish (+0/20)

Once I found this DR I rushed through it for like 40 minutes. There was a 19 but with 6qt bruh.

F' U' R2 F // EO+DR-8e8c (4/4)
L' B2 R' U' D // DR 2c3q (5/9)
L (L2 U2 L F2 L') // HTR (6/15)
(B2 U2 B2 R2 F2) // leave slice (5/20)

DR part:
L F2 R2 B2 U2 B2 L F2 L' U2 L2 -> R U2 L2 U2 F2 U2 R F2 R2 L D2 R2 // finish (+1/21)
 

Happy enough with only being 1 move away from the best possible finish from all the variations, as I did not check reducing to 4b4e.

(D') U2 R D' // EO (4/4)
(L) F' R2 B2 R2 B R // DR 1q (7/11)
B2 U2 D2 F // HTR (4/15)
R2 F2 B2 U2 R L' F2 R L // finish (9-2/22)


I missed the 4 moves EO that gives a 20 ;(

R' F' L D' R // EO (5/5)
D (L2 F2 B2 D) // DR 1q (5/10)
(B2 R2 U2 L2 B) // HTR (5/15)
(L2 U D' F2 U D) // leave slice (6-2/19)

... U' D L2 [B' L2 U2 R2 B2] D' F2 B2 L2

[] -> B2 F U2 F B' D2 L2 F2 // finish (+3/22)


64 EO's checked.

I missed 11 moves finish from the DR that was using 3qt and also breaking the HTR bruh.
I also found the same leave slice in a different way:

R' F' L D' R
U' F2 U' D L2 B'
(L2 F2 B2 D)
L2 U2 R2 B2 // 19 to wrong slice 

(D' U R U') // EO+DR-4e4c (4/4)
F R2 B R2 L2 F L // DR 2c4q (7/11)
B'^ D2 F'^ (B U2 B') // HTR (6/17)
R2 B2 R2 F2 U2 R2 U2 // leave slice (7/24)

^w // finish (+0/24)


How can an scramble with such EO's be so bad??

D L F' B R' // EO+DR-4e4c (5/5)
U2 L2 F2 U B // DR 1q (5/10)
F2 D (B2 L2) // almost HTR but finish now is easy (4/14)
(D' B2 U' D' R2 U R2 L2 D2) // finish (9-1/22)

I missed a 21 from a variation of the DR, but it required two moves before first qt which is a bit sus (well, ignoring the fact that the EO extension I used is also a bit sus but whatever)

U2 L' B' // EO (3/3)
R' D, U2 [L' B2 R U] // DR 1q (7/10)

[] -> R2 L F2 R D // +1 extension (+1/11)

R // HTR (1/12)

then the HTR is shit even using FR, so I just spammed blockbuilding solutions, the one that worked was focusing on solving F/B:

F2 L2 D2 // blue sq (3/15)
B2 L2 D2 // green sq (3/18)
F2 L2 D2 // finish (3/21)

D' L' F2 R' // EO+DR-8e7c (4/4)
B2 D' R2 B' D F // DR 2c3q (6/10)
D (F2 R2 D' F2 D) // HTR (6/16)
(R' L B2 D2 R' L) // finish (6/22)


71 EO's checked omg

U' L B' R' // EO (4/4)
F, D2 L2 U B // DR 4b2q (5/9)
(U' R2 F2 B2 U') // HTR (5/14)
(L2 B2 U2 B2 L2) // finish (5/19)

It was in fact 16 to wrong slice, but optimal insertion from it still 19 ;P

(U' L D') // EO (3/3)
(F L') L F' L // DR 4b2q (5/8)
B' L2 B' R2 F' L2 F // HTR (7/15)
D2 F2 U2 F2 // AB3E (4/19)
R U2 R' L F2 L' // finish (6-3/22)



I missed optimal finish by 1 move, but tbh it was hard.

R (U' D2 R) // EO+DR-4e (4/4)
U B2 U2 F' R2 L2 B // DR 4b2e (7/11)
L2 U2 L2 U R2 U // HTR (6/17)
B2 U2 B2 R2 // finish (4-1/20)


Just a classical kalindumaxxed solve, I had 3 10+3 and a 9+4 and all of them were trash.

(U') R' D2 B U // EO+DR-6e4c (5/5)
F' L' B2 R // DR 2c3q (4/9)
(F' U2 D2 R2 F R2 F') // HTR (7/16)
(U2 R2 U2) // leave slice (3/19)

DR section:

U2 R2 U2 [F R2 F' R2 U2 D2 F] 

[] -> B U2 F' U2 L2 F2 B2 L2 B // finish (+2/21)


I found this DR after checking everything and deciding to extend some EO's. This was one of the first 2-3 extensions I tried, and as it looked promising I decided to all in on it. I missed 20 optimal finish that was a bit tricky, and from the other way of achieving DR in 9 there was also 20 finish but using 5qt.

(F' L U F') // EO+DR-4e4c (4/4)
R2 L2 D L' D B2 D' // DR 4b2e (7/11)
(L2 B2 R B2 R') // HTR (5/16)
(D2 F2 B2 R2 B2 U2) // finish (6/22)


38 EO's checked. Happy enough, 22 was the best posible among all the DR's I had :)

(U2 B' R B) // EO+DR-8e7c (4/4)
U D L2 R' D' L // DR 2c3q (6/10)
U' (U' R2 F2 B2 D') // HTR (6/16)
(R2 D2 B2 R2) // leave slice (4/20)

DR part:
U' R2 B2 D2 R2 D F2 B2 R2 U -> D' F2 U2 B2 U2 R2 D' R2 L2 F2 D // finish (+1/21)

Solution: U D L2 R' D' L D' F2 U2 B2 U2 R2 D' R2 L2 F2 D B' R' B U2


46 EO's checked, I spent 10 minutes on the rewriting, it took me a long time to realize that there was +1 to a new LS doing the blocky fish thing.

(B' R' F' U' F) // EO (5/5)
(R, D R2 L D' R) // DR 4c3q (6/11)
(D) F2 L2 [D R2 F2 U // HTR (7/18)
F2 U2] F2 R2 // leave slice (4/22)

[] -> U F2 L2 U L2 U D // finish (+1/23)


19 EO's checked lol, what a pain of scramble.

(R2 B2 R F') // EO+DR-4e4c (4/4)
(D F2 R2 U L) // DR 1q (5/9)
B2 L2 // sq (2/11)
D2 L2 D L2 // this looks familiar (4/15)
U' F2 L2 F2 U // finish (5/20)

33 EO's checked.

I literally found the finish this way, I somehow missed the HTR approach on it xD

(R U' F D) // EO+DR-8e7c (4/4)
(B' R' F) // DR 4c4q xD (3/7)
(R) L' F2 L B2 R2 U2 R' // HTR (8/15)
L2 B2 U D' F2 U D // finish (7/22)


33 EO's checked. 
One of the optimal solutions for the DR in 21 was so similar to mine, but I don't think I would have found it if the slice was not already done.

I almost found this DR that gave really easy 21:

B' U' F' D'         //eo-ud      (4/4)
B' D2 U2 F2 L B2 R  //dr-fb-eoud (7/11)
B' L2 D2 B'         //htr-fb     (4/15)
L2 U2 L2 F2 U2 F2   //finish     (6/21)

But I briefly checked the B JZP and forgot to check B' :(

(R2 D' F' U) // EO (4/4)
(R' B', U2 F2 B2 L' B2 R) // DR 2c3q (8/12)
R2 B' D2 F U2 F' // HTR (6/18)
R L F2 R' L' // finish (5-1/22)

47 EO's checked.

This scramble was bad, basically this solution came from nowhere, as from that DR I quickly found a 20 to 2e2e and then this finish ocurred xD 

D R U' F' L // EO+DR-4e4c (5/5)
B' L2 U2 B U // DR 4a4e (5/10)
(L2 F D2 F2 D2 L2 F) // HTR (7/17)
(L2 U2 R2 U2 F2) // finish (5/22)


48 EO's checked, I completely ignored the 2 moves EO until last 20 minutes as I considered that if there was anything insanely good from it that would be enough time for finding it, and I found nothing from it bruh.

B' U' F B // EO (4/4)
(L U) [L' B2 D2 R' U] // DR 4b2q (7/11)
(L U2 F2 L) // HTR (4/15)

[] -> R2 L F2 U2 R' D' // +1 variation but better HTR (+1/16)

U2 L2 U2 D2 F2 // leave slice (5/21)

… U2 {L2 U2 D2 F2 L' F2 U2 L'} U' L 

{} -> R2 U2 D2 B2 L' B2 D2 L R2 // finish (+1/22)


53 EO's checked and the best DR I had was this, that ended being way better than I expected.

R (B' R') // EO (3/3)
D, L2 D2 F' R2 B' // DR        4b2q (6/9)
L2 U2 L2 U' L2 F2 D // HTR (7/16)
B2 L2 D2 B2 R2 L2 // finish (6-1/21)



What an stressful scramble, a lot of short DR's from that EO and none of them was incredible. I'm sure I missed something better, but at the middle of the attempt I got distracted thanks to a postman that called me because he wasn't able to find my house or something xD

(U' F R2 D) // EO+JZP (4/4)
F2 U2 F' D2 B // DR 2c4q (5/9)
(R F2 R' F2 R D2 R') // HTR (7/16)
(F' B D2 F' B' R2) // finish (6/22)

but it looks sliceable on the JZP axis:

[F2 U2 F' D2 B R2 F B D2 F B'] …

[] -> F' B' R2 F2 B D2 B R2 F2 L2 // finish (-1/21)


54 EO's checked.
I'm so happy for the final solution as I spammed HTR's until I saw one that made a good combo with JZP ;)
I also found a 12 to 2e2c from another DR from the same JZP xD

(U' F R2 D')
D2 R2 F' R2 B
L' U2 R2

According to IF there's a 22 with one insertion, or a 21 doing two, but both ways are cursed.

(D' R' D) // EO+DR-2e3c (3/3)
(F' L F' L' F) // DR 4b2q (5/8)
F2 U2 L' B2 R' // HTR (5/13)
F2 L2 F2 U2 F2 U2 // finish (6/19)

69 EO's checked. Once I decided to only check RZP<5 I started checking EO's in the order I wrote them: this was the 60th xD
I only had 11+1 and 10+4 before arriving to the UD axis in inverse, were I found 8+2, 9+3 and 10+1. The best posible from all my DR's was this 19 :)

(D L' U D) // EO+DR-4e4c (4/4)
L2 F' B R F' B' // cool DR 2c3q (6/10)
[R U2 D2 B2 R' D2 R'] // HTR (7/17)
D2 B2 U2 // leave slice (3-1/19)

[] ->         R2 L' F2 B2 D2 R L2 B2 L' // finish (+2/21)


64 EO's checked. A bit dissapointed with the +2 to fix slice but it was optimal for the DR.

I had a 10+2 and a 9+4 from 
(L) B2 R //
(U) // DR-2e3c
but once I found the 10+3 from my final solution I spent the whole time on it, as having the EO ending with UD and the DR trigger with RL had really good double slice potential that I ended up not using bruh.

(D B F R2 U') // EO+DR-4e4c (5/5)
(R' F R U2 B2 L) // DR 4b2q (6/11)
D2 L2 [B' L2 B'] // HTR (5/16)
D2 L2 U2 F2 R2 // leave slice (5/21)

[] -> B2 F U2 F' // finish (+1/22)

B' D' // EO+DR-4e4c (2/2)
R' F2 L' B D2 L2 B' // DR 4b2q (7/9)
D2 F2 U2 R U2 L' // HTR (6/15)
U2 R2 F2 D2 R2 F2 U2 // finish (7/22)

F (B' R L F) // EO+DR-8e7c (5/5)
(U2 R' U' R' D') // DR 4a2q (5/10)
(L) D2 B2 [L // HTR (4/14)
F2 R2 // FR (2/16)
U2] F2 D2 B2 // leave slice (4/20)

[] -> L' D2 L2 F2 R2 // finish (+1/21)



I worked with this DR because I found an early 22 from the non extended DR:

F (B' R L F)
(R' U' R' D')
B2 L (F2 U2 D2 R)
(B2 U2 B2 U2 F2 R2 F2)

and then I tried some ways of extending the DR looking for 4a4e, but there was not 4a4e anywhere lol

U F B R2 U // EO+DR-2e3c (5/5)
R B R' D2 B' R // cool DR 1q (6/11)
(U2 B L2 U2 F2) // AB2E2E (5/16)
(F U2 R2 L2 D2 R2 L2 F') // finish (8-1/23)

What a bait scramble, I had a 9+3 and a 10+3, both 2c, and both were trash with some 22 optimal using 5qt.

F' B2 U' // EO (3/3)
(F' R) B' D2 F2 R // DR 4c3q (6/9)
(B) U2 B' L2 B // HTR (5/14)
U2 D2 R2 U2 F2 D2 B2 // finish (7-1/20)

(F) R B L F // EO+DR-4e4c (5/5)
(U' D2 F2  L2 D' R) // DR 2c3q (6/11)
(B2 D*) U F2 U* // HTR (5/16)
L2 B2 D2 L2 D2* L2 F2 // leave slice (7/23)

*w // finish (+0/23)


Not happy with the result, but every DR I checked looked promising and ended being trash :/

I found a couple of cool 11+3 DR's:
U (L F L D)
(F' B R B' F2 L)

U (L F L D')
(F B' L' F2 B' R)

From all my DR's the best posible result was 22 doing 3 ht before first qt wtf

(R' L2 B' U) // EO (4/4)
L', R2 F' R2 B' D2 F L // DR 1q (8/12)
D2 L2 F' // HTR (3/15)
D2 [L2 F2 U2] F2 U2 // AB2E2E (6-1/20)

[] -> R2 B2 D2 R2 L2 // finish (+2/22)


37 EO's checked. I found the RZP while I was nissing L (F B2 R) EO :P

I also found another 22 but I prefered the kalindumaxxed one:

L (F B2 R)
(B' U' R2 U L2 U)
B' D2 F' (L2 F2 D2 F R2 F')
(D2 B2 D2) // LS in 22 with +0

(L' U' F2 B2 L) // EO+DR-4e4c (5/5)
D // lol another RZP that is better (1/6)
B2 F' D2 F' U' // DR 2c3q (5/11)
F L2 B' L2 [B' // HTR but is also FR (5/16)
L2 U2] L2 D2 L2 // leave slice (5-1/20)

[] -> F' D2 L2 F B' // finish (+2/22)

73 EO's checked wtf.
I felt that I managed the time so bad as I wrote too much EO's at the start.
I also had

F2 U' R2 F 
R2 D2 L' B2 D // DR 2c4q in 9 moves with optimal in 21

D' B2 R L2 D 
F D2 B R B' // DR 2c3q in 10 with optimal in 23

(L B L2 R' F) // EO+DR-8e7c (5/5)
F2 B2 R' D' L U // DR 2c4q (6/11)
R (R F2 L') B2 U2 R' // HTR (7/18)
F2 D2 B2 L2 U2 // leave slice (5/23)

… U2 [R' F2 D2 B2 L2 U2 L] F2 R' …

[] -> L' U2 F2 D2 L2 B2 R' L2] // finish (+1/24)



22 EO's checked. Trash scramble, and also unfortunate that the 4qt DR had no +0 for solving slice >;(

R2 L' D' B' // EO (4/4)
(D) D2 R2 D' R' D // DR 2c3q (6/10)
F2 D2 L D2 L' D2 F2 R // HTR (8/18)
B2 U2 B2 U2 // finish (4/22)

Solution: R2 L' D' B' D2 R2 D' R' D F2 D2 L D2 L' D2 F2 R B2 U2 B2 U2 D'

37 EO's checked.
I'm not so happy with the result given such an awesome scramble, but the time management on this is so hard ;/

U' (L' F2 D') // EO (4/4)
F (R2 B' F2 R F2 R' F) // DR 4c4q (8/12)
(R U2) // sq (2/14)
(L D2) // blocks and now finish is trivial (2/16)
(F2 R2 B2 R B2 L') // finish (6/22)


43 EO's checked.
I found this DR because the RZP had a good ARM and the first DR from it was this, then I proceed to solve the cube as it was a bad subset but everything solved so well xD.

Other DR I worked the most with was

(F) U R' D' B'
D (L2 B2 U' L' U') 

F' L U R // EO+DR-4e4c (4/4)
U2 F' U // DR 4b2q (3/7)
(L2 U2 B U2 R2 F) // HTR (6/13)
U2 [F2 R2 U2 R2 L2 F2] D2 F2 // leave slice (9-2/20)

[] -> B2 L2 D2 R2 L2 B2 // finish (+0/20)


48 EO's checked. 
I found this DR a bit late because my order of checking EO's was kind of random, but as the shortest linear HTR gave the optimal finish ;P

I had a backup 23 that I found in about 15 minutes:

B (L' F R B) 
L R2 U D R2 D' R'
F2 L2 D2 F2 U' R2 U'
R2 L2 F2 R2

U2 F' L2 B // EO+DR-8e7c (4/4)
U D R D' R2 D // DR 4b2q (6/10)
U2 B2 U2 R F2 [L' // HTR (6/16)
F2 L2] D2 B2 D2 // leave slice (5/21)

[] -> R' D2 R L // finish (+1/22)


54 EO's checked.
I found this DR thanks to the ARM stats, as it is not a good case to set up to the common square+line trigger :P

B U' B2 U' // EO (4/4)
(B, L2 F L F) // DR 4a2q (5/9)
(R) F2 L D2 R' F2 B2 L // HTR (8/17)
F2 B2 R2 B2 // finish (4/21)



45 EO's checked.
I'm sure I missed something incredible, but I only had this DR to work with along some 9+5
As the edges were shit I tried some 4q paths and it worked.

B (D' L F) // EO (4/4)
(D2 L) // DR-4e4c/AR-2e3c (2/6)
U' D2 L2 D R' // DR 4b2q (5/11)
F2 B2 U R2 [U // HTR (5/16)
R2 U2] L2 F2 L2 // leave slice (5-1/20)

[] -> D B2 U' D' // finish (+1/21)

Awful scramble. I got really lucky on that specific DR, that I found having in mind that that DRM/ARM case is one of the bests, otherwise I don't think I would have switch to that RZP.

(U D2 F2 B' U) // EO+DR-8e7c (5/5)
(F2 B' L2 R' B' L) // DR 4c3q (6/11)
(B*) F R2 B2 U2 F'* // HTR (6/17)
D2 B2 L2 U2 L2 // leave slice (5/22)

*w // finish (+0/22)

U2 B R' U // EO (4/4)
R // DR-4e4c (1/5)
(L' B2 R' B' R2 F') R' // DR 2c4q (7-2/10)
(L' U2 B2 L F2 L' F2 L') // HTR (8/18)
(U2 D2 L2 F2 D2) // finish (5/23)