R' U' F U2 F' L2 U L2 U2 R D R2 F R2 L' F2 B2 R' U2 F2 L2 F R' U' F
U2 D' F' D' L2 U' D B2 D2 R' D2 R U2 R' L' D' R F2 R2 U2 F
(F’) U2 D’ F’//EO (4/4) U (U2 R2 F2 R’ D)//DR, 4b2 (6/10) ([R2 B2 R’ F2 L])//HTR (5/15) (D2 B2 U D’ L2 U D)//M slice (7-2/20) []->(R L U2 R’ D2 R) (21) Final: U2 D’ F’ D’ L2 U’ D B2 D2 R’ D2 R U2 L’ R’ D’ R F2 R2 U2 F 4/4/6 to start is great, but 2 of the 4 bads were 5 move optimals and there were a ton of NISS 4 movers to check. This finish is optimal among the 2 possible DR variations. Other DRs: B’ D’ B’ U2 R (R2 F’ U’ B’ U)//4b2 (10)
R' U' F U2 D' L F2 D B' U R2 L' U2 L F2 B' L2 B L2 D2 R' U' F
B L2 B U R' L U R2 L' U2 D F2 L2 U' R2 D' R2 L2 D2 L2 F' B2
(F) B L2 B//EO (4/4) U R' L U L'//DR, 2c3 (5/9) R2 [U' L2 B2 D' L2 D'//HTR (7/16) R2 L2 U2] L2 B2//E slice (5/21) []->R2 U2 D F2 L2 U' R2 D' L2 R2 D2 (22) Final: B L2 B U R' L U L' R2 U2 D F2 L2 U' R2 D' L2 R2 D2 L2 B2 F' This 2/6/4 made me rush through the bazillion 4 move EOs quickly. I found many sub-10 DRs but almost all were garbage, however I did get a DR with a 21 optimal that I really should've found but didn’t. Other: (F’) F U2 F (U) R’ B2 U’ L2 U’//4b2 (10) R’ (L’ F2 R U2 R) (B2 F2 D2 B2 D2)//pretty reasonable 21 optimal that I missed. (F’) F U2 F D L’ D2 R D R’//2c3 (10) (F’) F U2 F R D’ R’ D2 L//this and the below two are bad. L2 U2 R’ D (F L F2 B2 R) D’ L2 R’ D F L2 R F R
R' U' F D' F R' F2 U2 F2 D' B2 U F2 R2 U2 R2 B' D2 F2 R2 U' L D R' U' F
B D R L' F B L2 B L F D2 B2 U2 B R2 F' R2 L2 U2 F B L2
B D//EO (2/2) R L' F B L2 B L//DR, 2c3 (7/9) [F D2 B2 U2 B R2 B'//HTR (7/16) U2 D2 R2 B2] L2//S slice (5/21) []->F D2 B2 U2 B R2 F' L2 R2 U2 F B (22) Final: B D R L' F B L2 B L F D2 B2 U2 B R2 F' L2 R2 U2 F B L2 2/6/4 is a scam. I sped through all the EOs not bothering with RZP in 5 and ended up with most nothing. I even went with some premove abuse stuff on the 2 mover EO and still only had almost nothing. There is an easy 19 from this EO that absolutely nobody found for some reason: B D' U2 R' D2 B2 D2 L' F' L//i did not even find U2 R as an RZP... (R2 F) D2 F D2 F L2 R2 U2//19 Anyway my finish is optimal from DR. Other: B D’ R L’ F’ B L2 B L//2c3, somehow a different number of edges from the above one B D’ R L’ U2 F’ U2 B2 L//HTR equivalent to the above but not in an obvious way