I’ve always believed that for FMC solvers whose proficiency isn’t strong enough to cover most findable solutions (like me), a good result basically just equals a neat fit between the right solutions and your search coverage. So the part of Enrico’s view that I really resonate with is: you just need to be prepared, but for **my coverage part** (and of course, slowly expand that coverage over time xd), then wait for the right scrams. For me, this might mean trying not to miss any 4-move EOs, or making sure to at least glance at every rzp1 for 4 movers, or, if you need a safety solution, spending all your remaining time on a single DR to get its optimal. These three points actually happen to be concise reflections of my three attempts. And because of that, I can comfortably draw one conclusion: today was exactly that neat fit for me.